Significance of zinc fertilization and microbial inoculation on phosphorus nutrition of rice (Oryza sativa)
284 / 127
Keywords:
Aerobic rice system (ARS), Anabaena–Pseudomonas (An-Ps) biofilmed formulations, Phosphorus, RiceAbstract
The present experiment was conducted during rainy season of 2013-14 at ICAR–Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to compare and calculate variations in phosphorus (P) concentration and uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant as well as soil available P (Olsen’s reagent 0.5 M NaHCO3-extractable) as influenced by three different crop establishment methods (CEMs), rates of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and zinc (Zn) fertilization and microbial inoculations in spilt plot design with three replications. The concentration and uptake of P in puddled transplanted rice (PTR) and system of rice intensification (SRI) was significantly higher than aerobic rice system (ARS) and total uptake was increased by 480 and 540 g/ha in PTR and 580 and 660 g/ha in SRI over ARS in first and second year, respectively. The treatment with 100% recommended dose of nutrients (RDN) (25.8 kg P/ha and 120 kg N/ha) had significantly higher P concentration and uptake than 75% RDN and absolute control. The correlation between milled rice yield and P concentration was found positive (R2= 0.95 and 0.94). Application of microbial inoculation significantly increased P concentration and uptake over fertilizer control (75% RDN) and absolute control which increased in total P uptake by 640 and 680 g/ha due to application of Anabaena–Pseudomonas (An-Ps) biofilmed formulations (MI2) and Anabaena sp. (CR1) + Providencia sp. (PR3) consortia (MI1) over fertilizer control (75% RDN).
Downloads
References
Alori E T, Glick B R and Babalola O O. 2017. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971
Amanullah and Inamullah. 2016. Dry matter partitioning and harvest index differ in rice genotypes with variable rates of phosphorus and zinc nutrition. Rice Science 23(2): 78–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.09.006
Jat R S and Ahlawat I P S. 2006. Direct and residual effect of vermicompost, biofertilizers and phosphorus on soil nutrient dynamics and productivity of chickpea–fodder maize sequence. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28(1): 41–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v28n01_05
Lavakush, Yadav J, Verma J P, Jaiswal D K and Kumar A. 2014. Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ecological Engineering 62: 123–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.013
Madar P, Kaiser F, Adholeya A, Singh R, Uppal H S, Sharma A K, Srivastava R, Sahai V, Aragno M, Wiemken A, Johri B N and Fried P M. 2011. Inoculation of root microorganisms for sustainable wheat–rice and wheat–blackgram rotations in India. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43: 609–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.031
Parameswari Y S and Srinivas A. 2014. Influence of weed management practices on nutrient uptake and productivity of rice under different methods of crop establishment. Journal of Rice Research 7(1, 2): 77–86.
Prasad R, Shivay Y S and Kumar D. 2018. Nitrogen and phosphorus recovery efficiency and agronomic experimentation with phosphorus. Indian Journal of Agronomy 63(2): 224–6.
Roberts T L and Johnston A E. 2015. Phosphorus use efficiency and management in agriculture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 105(part B): 275–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.013
Sharma S N, Prasad R, Davari M, Ram M and Dwivedi M K. 2011. Effect of phosphorus management on production and phosphorus balance in a rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 57: 655–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650341003755431
Sharma S N, Shivay Y S, Prasad R, Dwivedi M K, Davari M and Kumar S. 2010. Relative efficiency of diammonium phosphate and mussoorie rock phosphate plus phosphate solubilizing bacteria on productivity and phosphorus balance in rice–potato–mungbean cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33(7): 998–1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904161003728677
Stephen J, Shabanamol S, Rishad K S and Jisha M S. 2015. Growth enhancement of rice (Oryza sativa) by phosphate solubilizing Gluconacetobacter sp. (MTCC 8368) and Burkholderia sp. (MTCC 8369) under greenhouse conditions. Biotech 5: 831–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-015-0286-5
Tabatabai M A and Bremner J M. 1969. Use of p–nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1: 301–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
Tandon H L S. 2013. Nutrient in soils, plants, waters, fertilizers and organic manures. Methods of Analysis of Soils, Plants, Waters, Fertilizers and Organic Manures, 2nd Ed, pp. 1–18.
Tandon H L S (Eds). Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization, New Delhi, India.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.