Efficacy of different herbicides on weed dynamics and productivity of kharif maize (Zea mays) and their residual effect on succeeding wheat crop (Triticum aestivum)
386 / 203
Keywords:
2, 4-D, atrazine, Alachlor, Tembotrione, Visual phytotoxicity, Weed control efficiencyAbstract
Weeds are the major biotic constraints in maize crop due to its wider row spacing limiting its productivity. So, a field experiment was conducted during kharif and rabi seasons of 2015 and 2016, at RRS, Karnal, Haryana to study the effect of different weed control methods on weed flora, growth and yield of kharif planted maize, the residual effect of different herbicides applied in maize on succeeding wheat crop. Treatments included two pre-emergence (PRE) herbicides namely atrazine 750 or 1000 g/ha and alachlor 2000 g/ha along with three post-emergence herbicides (POST) atrazine 500 g/ha, 2,4-D 500 g/ha and tembotrione 120 or 140 g/ha +S (surfactant) at 35 days after sowing (DAS) were used. Hand weeding twice at 20 and 35 DAS, weedy check and weed free treatments were also included. Major weed species infesting the experimental field were Cyperus rotundus, Brachiaria reptans, Dactyloctenium aegyptium, Amaranthus viridis, Digera arvensis, Phyllanthus niruri and Portulaca oleracea. Among herbicide treatments at 50 DAS, alachlor 2000 g/ha as PRE fb tembotrione 120 g/ha provided the highest weed control efficiency (95.1 %). Maximum grain yield (6505 and 6903 kg/ha) and yield attributes of maize were obtained in weed free treatment which was statistically at par with alachlor 2000 g/ha fb tembotrione 120 g/ha +S at 35 DAS (T13) (6380 and 6816 kg/ha). No visual phyto-toxicity of any applied herbicide was observed on maize crop. All herbicide treatments employed in kharif maize, irrespective of their dose and application time did not show any residual carryover effect on succeeding wheat crop.
Downloads
References
India’s comprehensive statistical analysis available on world wide web;https://www.indiastat.com/ agriculturedata/2/agriculturalproduction/225/maize/17199/ stats.aspx.
Kaur T, Kaur S and Bhullar M S. 2016. Management of complex weed flora in maize with post-emergence herbicides. Indian Journal of Weed Science 48(4): 390–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00102.7
Kumar S, Rana S S, Chander N and Angiras N N. 2012. Management of hardy weeds in maize under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Weed Science 44(1): 11–7.
Punia S S, Yadav D and Kamboj B. 2007. Weed flora of maize in Haryana. Haryana Journal of Agronomy 23(1&2): 80–1.
Sarma C K and Gautam R C. 2006. Effect of tillage, seed rate and weed control methods on weeds and maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science 38(1&2): 58–61.
Singh S, Walia U S, Singh B, Singh G and Deol K S. 2007a. Control of hardy weeds in maize (Zea mays L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) at the farmers’ fields. Journal of Research 44(4): 273–7.
Singh V P, Guru S K, Kumar A, Banga A and Tripathi N. 2012b. Bioefficacy of tembotrione against mixed weed complex in maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science 44(1): 1–5.
Swetha K, Madhavi M, Pratibha G and Ramprakash T. 2015. Weed management with new generation herbicides in maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science 47(4): 432–3.
Yadav A, Mehta R, Punia S S, Hooda V, Malik R K, Rana V and Bellinder R R. 2003. Residual effect of four sulfonylurea herbicides applied on wheat on succeeding crops in rotation. Indian Journal of Weed Science 35(3&4): 259–61.
Yadav H L. 2017. ‘Comparative efficiency of new herbicides in managing resurging weeds in wheat and their residual effect on succeeding crops’. Ph D thesis, SKN Agriculture University, Jobner, Rajasthan.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.