Identification of resistant genotypes and representative environments for spot blotch (Biploris sorokiniana) in barley (Hordeum vulgare)

VISHNU KUMAR; SUDHEER KUMAR; S P SINGH; S S VAISH; DEEPSHIKHA DEEPSHIKHA; J B KHAN; A S KHARUB; G P SINGH

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i5.104358

Authors

VISHNU KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
SUDHEER KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
S P SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
S S VAISH ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
DEEPSHIKHA DEEPSHIKHA ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
J B KHAN ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
A S KHARUB ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
G P SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i5.104358

Keywords:

AMMI, Barley, HA-GGE, Spot blotch

Abstract

A set of 31 barley genotypes was evaluated at four locations, viz. Kanpur, Pantnagar, Varanasi and Faizabad for two years (2016 and 2017) against spot blotch [Biploris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem.] resistance. The combined analysis of variance revealed significant influence of year (5.64%) and location (18.08%) effects with significant genotypic effects (29.05%). Location-wise, the highest susceptibility was observed at Varanasi (51.61%) followed by Kanpur (19.35%) whereas, the moderately susceptible reactions were obtained at Faizabad (67.74 %) and Kanpur (61.29%) locations. In heritability adjusted GGE biplot analysis, the ratio of (G+G × E)/(E+G+G × E) was estimated as 71.77 % and substantiated usefulness of generated biplots to elucidate resistant and stable genotypes with location discrimination. In AMMI analysis, the initial two principal components (PCs) cumulatively explained 90.7 % of total variation with individual scores of 51.8 % and 38.9 %, respectively. The triangular image of the initial three PCs depicted scattered pattern for disease reaction and varied response for the locations. The weather parameters, viz. maximum temperature, minimum temperature and sunshine hr/day showed strong correlations 0.87**, 0.83** and 0.64* with spot blotch severity. The genotypes, DWRB 180, PL 891 and DWRB 190 were found promising and suggested to be used in future resistance breeding and spot blotch genetic studies. The locations Varanasi and Faizabad were found type 2 discriminative and representative environments for spot blotch.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aggarwal R, Gupta S, Singh V B and Sharma S. 2011. Microbial detoxification of pathotoxin produced by spot blotch pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana infecting wheat. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 20(1): 66–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-010-0027-0

Bashyal B M, Chand R, Prasad L C and Joshi A K. 2012. Influence of growth stage on helminthosporol toxin of Bipolaris sorokiniana of barley (H. vulgare L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82 (8): 724–26.

Chand R, Sen D, Prasad K D, Singh A K, Bashyal B M, Prasad L C and Joshi A K. 2008. Screening for disease resistance in barley cultivars against Bipolaris sorokiniana using callus culture method. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 46: 249–53.

Huber L and Gillespie T J. 1992. Modeling leaf wetness in relation to plant disease epidemiology. Annual Review of Phytopathology 30: 533–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.003005

Kuldeep T, Nandan R, Kumar U, Prasad L C, Chand R and Joshi A K. 2008. Inheritance and identiﬁcation of molecular markers associated with spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus L.) resistance through microsatellites analysis in barley. Genetics and Molecular Biology 31:734-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008000400021

Kumar V, Kharub A S and Singh G P. 2018. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction and yield stability index for genotype by environment analysis and wider adaptability in barley. Cereal Research Communications 46 (2):365-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.17

Leng Y, Wang R, Ali S, Zhao M and Zhong S. 2016. Sources and genetics of spot blotch resistance to a new pathotype of Cochliobolus sativus in the USDA Small Grains Collection. Plant Disease 100:1988–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-16-0152-RE

Prasad R, Prasad L C, Chand R and Joshi A K. 2013. Assessment of diversity for resistance to spot blotch disease and its association with certain phenotypic traits in barely. Field Crops Research 154:195–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.008

Singh S, Singh H, Sharma A, Meeta M, Singh B, Joshi N, Grover P, Al-Yassin and Kumar S. 2014. Inheritance of spot blotch resistance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 94: 1203-09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-153

Wang R, Leng Y, Ali S, Wang M and Zhong S. 2017. Genome-wide association mapping of spot blotch resistance to three different pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus in the USDA barley core collection. Molecular Breeding 4: 37-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-017-0626-8

Yan W and Holland J B. 2010. A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica 171: 355–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0030-5

Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B, Woods S and Cornelius P L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47: 643-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374

Yang R C, Crossa J, Cornelius P L and Burgueno J. 2009. Biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction: Proceed with caution. Crop Science 49: 1564-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.11.0665

Zadoks J C, Chang T T and Konzak C F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x