Soil moisture induced yield variability in major crops of Karnataka

H S SHIVARAMU; M H MANJUNATHA; LINGARAJ HUGGI; SANTANU KUMAR BAL; P VIJAYA KUMAR; H S PADMASHRI; D V SOUMYA; L NAGESHA; M MOHANTY

doi:10.56093/ijas.v92i7.104382

Authors

H S SHIVARAMU University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka
M H MANJUNATHA University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka
LINGARAJ HUGGI University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka
SANTANU KUMAR BAL ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana
P VIJAYA KUMAR ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana
H S PADMASHRI University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka
D V SOUMYA University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka
L NAGESHA University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK Campus, Bangalore, Karnataka
M MOHANTY ICAR-Indian Institute Soil Science, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i7.104382

Keywords:

Drought, PASM, Finger millet, Groundnut, Pigeonpea

Abstract

South interior Karnataka, being a major rainfed zone contributing to production of pigeonpea, finger millet,
groundnut, etc., suffers from severe yield instability due to dependency on rainfall. As the distribution of rainfall
(spatial and temporal) is erratic, droughts are becoming a common phenomenon and adversely affecting regional crop production by influencing soil moisture availability. Regression studies on per cent available soil moisture (PASM) and yield were conducted based on long-term field observations in 2014–19 on soil moisture and crop yields in finger millet, pigeonpea and groundnut at UAS-GKVK, Bengaluru. The outcomes indicated large yield variability due to minor soil moisture differences. In finger millet, at 58 PASM, 50% (1500 kg/ha) of normal yield was obtained and at 40 PASM, only 25% of normal yield was obtained. In pigeonpea, the crop yield recorded at 25 PASM was 8–18% (202–347 kg/ha) of the normal yield. In groundnut 50 PASM gave 41% of normal yield. The outcome indicated different soil moisture requirement for different crops, stressed the need for amending existing non-crop specific PASM ranges for drought declaration. Amendments were brought in by considering different PASM levels in these three crops finger millet: 20–40 as severe, 40–60 as moderate, >60 as no drought; in pigeonpea, 25–30 as severe, 30–60 as moderate, >60 as no drought; in groundnut, 35–50 as severe, 50–70 PASM as moderate, >70 as no drought. Since the practicality of the study was proven, the amendments were given in the drought manual published by ministry of farmers’ welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

SANTANU KUMAR BAL, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana

AICRP on Agrometeorology

Principal Scientist (Agrometeorology)

References

Anjum S A, Wang L C, Farooq M, Hussain M, Xue L L and Zou C M. 2011. Brassinolide application improves the

drought tolerance in maize through modulation of enzymatic antioxidants and leaf gas exchange. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197(3): 177–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00459.x

Anonymous. 2002. Indices for drought declaration. Manual on drought declaration, Department of Agriculture and

Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

Anonymous. 2016. Manual for Drought Management, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, GoI, New Delhi.

Bal S K, Sandeep V M, Vijaya Kumar P, Subba Rao A V M, Pramod V P, Srinivasa Rao Ch, Singh N P, Manikandan N and

Bhaskar S. 2022. Assessing impact of dry spells on the principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions of India. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 313: 108768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108768

Chakravarti A K, Moitra R, Mukherjee A, Dey P and Chakraborty P K. 2010. Effect of planting methods and mulching on the thermal environment and biological productivity of groundnut. Journal of Agrometeorology 12(1): 77–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v12i1.1275

Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G and Sharkey T D. 2004. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under

drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant biology 6(03): 269–79.

Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D and Basra S. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 185–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021

Guled P M, Shekh A M, Patel H R and Pandey V. 2013. Effect of soil moisture, evapotranspiration and stress degree days on pod yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Journal of Agrometeorology 15(2): 135–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v15i2.1460

Kumar G, Kurothe R S, Brajendra V A, Rao, B K and Pande V C. 2014. Effect of farmyard manure and fertilizer application on crop yield, runoff and soil erosion and soil organic carbon under rainfed pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(7): 816–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i7.41986

Nam N H, Chauhan Y S and Johansen C. 2001. Effect of timing of drought stress on growth and grain yield of extra-shortduration pigeonpea lines. Journal of Agricultural Science 136(2): 179–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859601008607

Richard G A, Luis S P, Dirk R and Martin S. 1998. Crop Evapotranspirations–Guidelines for computing crop water

requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Food and Agricultural Organizations, Geneva.

Ritchie J T. 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: discussion on the generality of relations between biomass production and evapotranspiration. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production, pp. 29–44. Ritchie J T (Eds). http://doi.org.10.2134/1983.limitationstoefficientwateruse.c2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/1983.limitationstoefficientwateruse.c2

Sahadeva Reddy B, Ravindranatha Reddy B, Radha Kumari C, Maruthi Sankar G R, Ashoka Reddy Y and Malliswara Reddy A. 2019. Effect of date of sowing and rainfall on sustainability of yield and rainwater use efficiency in cereal crops under arid Alfisols. Journal of Agrometeorology 21(2): 203–09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v21i2.234

Samarah N H. 2005. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25(1): 145–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2004064

Sahu Y K, Mishra E P and Rawat S. 2018. Quantification of crop water stress index (CWSI) for maize crop under

different microclimatic conditions of Allahabad. Journal of Agrometeorology 20 (Special issue): 368–71.

Thomson A M, Izaurralde R C, Rosenberg N J and He X. 2006. Climate change impacts on agriculture and soil carbon

sequestration potential in the Huang-Hai Plain of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114(2-4): 195–209.

Gulatii J M, Lenkn D and Jen S N. 2000. Root growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by irrigation schedules under different water table conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 70(2): 122–24.

Velu G. 1998. Effect of water stress on yield potential of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences68(5): 184–86.

Reddy A. 2013. Strategies for reducing mismatch between demand and supply of grain legumes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(3): 243–59.

Singh F, Singh I P and Mazumder N D. 2011. Estimation of yield loss due to Fusarium wilt and moisture deficit in longduration pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(11): 1046–51.

Subbareddy G, Maruthi V and Vanaja M. 2001. Effect of soil depth on productivity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in sole and intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71(8): 510–15.

Zhang X, Obringer R, Wei C, Chen N and Niyogi D. 2017. Droughts in India from 1981 to 2013 and implications to wheat production. Scientific Reports 7(1): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44552