Assessment of effectiveness of trainings conducted by ICAR
279 / 139
Keywords:
Effectiveness, Human Resource Management, Organisation development trainingAbstract
Training is essential not only to increase productivity, but also to keep workers of an organization motivated and inspired. In this study, the effectiveness of trainings conducted by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) during 2017-18 in which 901 Scientists, 506 Technical, 519 Administrative and 313 Skilled Support Staff (SSS) from 106 ICAR-Institutes across 26 States/UTs participated was assessed by HRM Unit, ICAR HQs, New Delhi during 2018-19. Study revealed that the pooled perceived training effectiveness index (PTEI) was 3.86, referring medium effectiveness of trainings. The mean PTEI score was the highest for SSS (3.94) followed by Administrative staff (3.90). Overall, most of the participants (58.83%) reported medium degree of effectiveness of the training programmes. Behavioural changes and changes in practices as a consequence of exposure to the trainings are evident from the findings. The study revealed that perceived effectiveness was significantly associated with age, gender and duration of training programmes. Some observed constraints by the trainees were inadequate infrastructure at Institutes, sometimes lesser relevancy of few topics and lack of practical exposure. The major suggestions were inclusion of more practical sessions, follow up programmes for trainee-trainer meet, and increasing the duration of the trainings in few cases. The trainings organised by ICAR should continue for all staff categories to bring about desirable changes in competencies.Downloads
References
Arthur W, Bennett W, Stanush P L and Mcnelly T L. 1998. Factors that influence skill decay and retention : a quantitative review and analysis. Human Performance 11(1): 57–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1101_3
Bennett C F. 1979. Analyzing Impacts of Extension Programs. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cruickshank Vaughan. 2018. Capacity building and succession planning. Open Journal of Leadership 7(1): 49–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2018.71004
Engetou Enga. 2017. The impact of training and development on organizational performance. Case Study : National Financial Credit Bank Kumba. Centria University of Applied Sciences.
Gist Marilyn, Stevens C K and Bavetta A G. 1991. Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology 44(4): 837–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00701.x
Kirkpatrick J and Kirkpatrick W K. 2009. The Kirkpatrick Four Levels: A Fresh Look After 50 Years 1959-2009. Kirkpatrick Partners, LLC.
Lawler, Edward E and Suttle J L. 1973. Expectancy theory and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 9(3): 482–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(73)90066-4
Maier N R. 1973. Psychology in Industrial Organizations (4th Ed.). Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
Mathieu J E, Heffner T S, Goodwi, G F, Salas E and Cannon- Bowers J A. 2000. The influence of shared mental models and team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(2): 273–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
Mohanty, Paresh C, Dash M, Dash M and Das S. 2019. A study on factors influencing training effectiveness. Espacios 40(2): 7–15.
Mullen J, Gray D and Meyer J D. 2015. Evaluating the impact of capacity building by ACIAR. 59th AARES Annual Conference. Rotorua, New Zealand.
Noe R A. 2000. Invited reaction: development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly 11(4): 361–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200024)11:4<361::AID-HRDQ3>3.0.CO;2-F
Pathak H N. 2015. Secondary succession in abandoned crop fallows: a review. International Journal of Environment 4(3): 166–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ije.v4i3.13243
Paul S, Vijayaragavan K, Singh P and Burman R R. 2015. Research productivity of agricultural Scientist: evidences from high performing and low performing institutes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sceinces 85(4): 487–92.
Paul, S, Tripathi, A K, Burman, R R and Singh A K. 2016a. Performance appraisal of the frontline extension system in north eastern region of India: a policy imperative. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(9): 1183–88.
Paul S, Tripathi A K, Singh, A K, Bhalerao A, Kumar B, Bordoloi R and Jat P. 2016b. Performance of the public agricultural extension system in disadvantageous settings: evidences from krishi vigyan kendras in north eastern region of India. Economic affairs 61(4): 725–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4666.2016.00090.5
Paul S, Vijayaragavan K, Singh P and Burman R and Chahal V P. 2017. Determinants of research productivity of agricultural Scientist: implications for the national agricultural research and education system of India. Current Science 112(2): 252–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i02/252-257
Salas E, Tannenbaum S I, Kraiger K and Smith-jentsch KA. 2012. The science of training and development in organizations : what matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13(2): 74–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
Wakely P. 1997. Capacity Building for Better Cities. Dpunews (34):1–4.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.