Spatial variability assessment of soil available phosphorus using geostatistical approach


291 / 154

Authors

  • Bhabani Prasad Mondal ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Bharpoor Singh Sekhon ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Rahul Sadhukhan ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Rajiv Kumar Singh ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Mohammad Hasanain ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Nilimesh Mridha ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Bappa Das ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Arghya Chattopa dhyay ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Koushik Banerjee ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i6.104795

Keywords:

Available phosphorus, Geostatistics, Kriging, Semivariogram, Spatial variability

Abstract

Soil available phosphorus (P), a major plant nutrient, exhibits a high degree of spatial variability. Spatial variability assessment of P is necessary for its precise management using geostatistics. Therefore, the present study was conducted in an intensely cropped region of Ladian village of Ludhiana, Punjab during 2014-2016 to assess the spatial variability status of P under three prevalent land use systems, viz. berseem-based land use, rice-wheat system and poplar-wheat based agroforestry system. The classical statistics showed the variability of available-P in terms of percent coefficient of variation (%CV), but unable to distinguish variability between rice-wheat (CV=38.79%) and poplar-wheat system (CV=38.58%). Lower variability was observed in berseem-based land use (CV=15.21%), though the mean available-P content (46 kg/ha) was higher in this land use. However, the geostatistical techniques successfully demonstrated the spatial dependence of P within and in between land uses using nugget-sill (NS) ratio. Gaussian model was found suitable for describing the spatial structure of available-P under berseem-based land use; while, Exponential models were found suitable for rice-wheat and poplar-wheat systems. The value of NS ratio of available-P was 0.17 for poplar-wheat based land use, suggesting strong spatial dependence, whereas the rest other land uses exhibited moderate (NS=0.74) to weak (NS=0.82) spatial dependence of available P. The spatial variability maps of P were generated using ordinary kriging technique, demonstrated significantly the higher variability of P in poplar-wheat system than other systems. This variability should be considered before applying phosphatic fertilizers to this land use to get optimum response. The generated maps would assist the farmers for site-specific P management in the study area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhattacharyya T, Pal D K and Easter M. 2007. Modeled soil organic carbon stocks and changes in the Indo-Gangetic Plains India from 1980 to 2030. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 122: 84–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.01.010

Bhunia G S, Shit P K and Chattopadhyay R. 2018. Assessment of spatial variability of soil properties using geostatistical approach of lateritic soil (West Bengal, India). Annals of Agrarian Science 16: 436–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2018.06.003

Cambardella C A, Moorman T B, Novak J M, Parkin T B, Karlen D L, Turco R F and Konopka A E. 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 1501–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033x

Donoghue S, Furley P A, Stuart N, Haggis R, Trevaskis A and Lopez G. 2019. The nature and spatial variability of lowland savanna soils: improving the resolution of soil properties to support land management policy. Soil Use and Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12513

Fu W, Tunney H and Zhang C. 2010. Spatial variation of soil nutrients in a dairy farm and its implications for site-specific fertilizer application. Soil and Tillage Research 106(2): 185–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.12.001

González I, Neaman A, Rubio P and Cortés A. 2014. Spatial distribution of copper and pH in soils affected by intensive industrial activities in Puchuncaví and Quintero, central Chile. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 14: 943–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000074

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.

Liu X, Herbert S J, Hashemi A M, Zhang X and Ding G. 2006. Effects of agricultural management on soil organic matter and carbon transformation-a review. Plant and Soil Environment 52: 531–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/3544-PSE

Martín, J R, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Gonzalo J, Gil C, Ramos-Miras J, Corbí J G and Boluda R. 2016. Assessment of the soil organic carbon stock in Spain. Geoderma 264: 117–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.10.010

Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watnable F S and Dean L A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular U S Department of Agriculture 939.

Patil S S, Patil V C and Al-Gaadi K A. 2011. Spatial variability in fertility status of soil surface soils. World Applied Science Journal 14(7): 1020–24.

Reza S K, Nayak D C, Mukhopadhyay S, Chattopadhyay T and Singh S K. 2017. Characterizing spatial variability of soil properties in alluvial soils of India using geostatistics and geographical information system. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 63(11): 1489–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1296134

Robinson G W. 1922. A new method for the mechanical analysis of soils and other dispersions. Journal of Agricultural Research 12: 306–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600005360

Schoning I, Totsche K and Kogel-Knabner I. 2006. Small scale spatial variability of organic carbon stocks in litter and solum of a forested Luvisol. Geoderma 136: 631–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.04.023

Singh Y V and Gaind S. 2019. Inorganic phosphorus fractions and crop productivity in response to different rates of phosphate-solublizing fungi Penicillium bilaii. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 89 (2): 238–45.

Vasu D, Singh S K, Sahu N, Tiwary P, Chandran P, Duraisami V P, Ramamurthy V, Lalitha M and Kalaiselvi B. 2017. Assessment of spatial variability of soil properties using geospatial techniques for farm level nutrient management. Soil and Tillage Research 169: 25–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.01.006

Wilding L P. 1985. Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation, and implication to soil surveys. (In) Soil Spatial Variability Workshop, pp 166–94.

Yasrebi J, Saffari M, Fathi H, Karimian N, Emadi M and Baghernejad M. 2008. Spatial variability of soil fertility properties for precision agriculture in southern Iran. Journal of Applied Science 8: 1642–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.1642.1650

Downloads

Submitted

2020-09-14

Published

2020-09-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mondal, B. P., Sekhon, B. S., Sadhukhan, R., Singh, R. K., Hasanain, M., Mridha, N., Das, B., dhyay, A. C., & Banerjee, K. (2020). Spatial variability assessment of soil available phosphorus using geostatistical approach. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(6), 1170-1175. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i6.104795
Citation