District level crop yield estimation with reduced number of crop cutting experiments


535 / 446

Authors

  • Kaustav Aditya ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Hukum Chandra ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Pradip Basak ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Vandita Kumari ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Shrila Das ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i6.104798

Keywords:

Agricultural statistics, Crop cutting experiments, Pilot survey, sample Size, Small area estimation

Abstract

It was observed that around 1300000 Crop Cutting Experiments (CCE) were conducted in India every year to find out the crop yield estimates of several major and minor crops under General Crop Estimation Surveys (GCES). Due to shortage of manpower and huge bulk of work day by day the data quality is becoming questionable. To tackle this problem, a pilot study was conducted by ICAR-IASRI, New Delhi sponsored by Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (MoA & FW), Govt. of India to generate district level estimates of major crop yield from a reduced sample size of villages selected from the states. With the reduction in number of villages, the problem of no sample size in some districts were faced during the study where common design based estimates of crop yield cannot be generated. To tackle this problem Aggregate level Small Area Estimation (SAE) was used to tackle this problem. The results obtained from this study in the state of Uttar Pradesh for two major crops, i.e. rice and wheat for two seasons, i.e. kharif and rabi of Agriculture Year 2015-16 and for paddy in Assam for kharif of the Agriculture Year (AY) 2015-16 in India were discussed. The yield estimates were compared with the estimates released under GCES for AY 2015-16. It was found that the estimates obtained from reduced sample size of number of CCEs w.r.t. GCES, produced similar estimates with acceptable level of precision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fay R E and Herriot R A. 1979. Estimation of income from small places: An application of James-Stein procedures to census data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 269–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482505

FAI. 2016. Fertilizer Statistics. 2015-16. The Fertilizer Association of India, New Delhi.

MOA. 2011. Report of Expert Committee on Agricultural Statistics. 2011. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers welfare, Govt. of India.

Singh R and Mangat N P S. 1996. Elements of Survey Sampling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1404-4

Sud U C, Ahmad T, Gupta V K, Chandra H, Sahoo P M, Aditya K, Singh M and Biswas A. 2017. Crop1&2: Measuring Crop Area and Yield under Pure Stand, Mixedand Continuous Cropping.

Working Paper No. 16. Global Strategy, FAO Publication, FAO, Rome. http://gsars.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ WP-16.01.2017-Findings-from-the-Field-Tests-Conducted-in- Three-Countries.pdf.

Sukhatme P V, Sukhatme B V, Sukhatme S and Asok C. 1984. Sampling Theory of Surveys with Applications, 3rd Edition, Iowa State University Press, USA.

Downloads

Submitted

2020-09-14

Published

2020-09-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Aditya, K., Chandra, H., Basak, P., Kumari, V., & Das, S. (2020). District level crop yield estimation with reduced number of crop cutting experiments. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(6), 1185-1189. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i6.104798
Citation