Mapping agricultural constraints: Nationwide demand-driven research, extension and policy perspectives
282 / 86
Keywords:
Agriculture & allied Sectors, Climate change, Farmer perceived constraints, Focus group discussion, Participatory mappingAbstract
Translating farmer knowledge into actionable agricultural policy remains a key challenge in agricultural governance. This study develops and operationalises a participatory diagnostic framework to generate structured policy-relevant agricultural intelligence. Using data from the Viksit Krishi Sankalp Abhiyan (VKSA) conducted during 2025 across India, a total of 11,477 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were held across 448 districts in 34 states and Union Territories (UTs), engaging 1,63,650 farmers including 55,250 farm women. Farmer-identified issues were grouped into 20 thematic domains and validated through severity scoring by Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) scientists using a standardised 10-point scale. Comparative analysis was conducted across four state typologies- large, medium, small states/UTs and north-eastern states. Findings showed strong convergence around three foundational constraints: seed system inefficiencies, climate variability and water management challenges, alongside region-specific priorities in mechanisation, horticulture and crop-livestock integration. The proposed framework strengthens the Research- Extension-Policy (REP) interface by institutionalising farmer knowledge within scientific validation and policy translation processes, offering a scalable model for adaptive, regionally differentiated agricultural strategies aimed at enhancing resilience, productivity and sustainability.
Downloads
References
Aheisibwe A R, Barekye A, Namugga P and Byarugaba A A. 2015. Challenges and opportunities for quality seed potato availability and production in Uganda. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16(2): 149–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ujas.v16i2.1 Bekele B G. 2022. Review on yield gap analysis: Modeling of achievable yields at farm level. European Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Research 10(2): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.37745/ ejafr.2013/vol9n22127
Bhattarai N, Pollack A, Lobell D, Fishman R, Singh B, Dar A and Jain M. 2021. The impact of groundwater depletion on agricultural production in India. Environmental Research Letters 16(8): 084030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac10de DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac10de
Birner R, Anderson J R, Birner R and Anderson J R. 2007. How to make agricultural extension demand-driven? The case of India’s Agricultural Extension Policy. IFPRI Discussion Paper. 49p. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.42370
Chambers R. 1994. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 22(7): 953–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
Chauhan J S, Prasad S R, Pal S, Choudhury P R and Bhaskar K U. 2016. Seed production of field crops in India: Quality assurance, status, impact and way forward. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(5): 563–79. https://doi. org/10.56093/ijas.v86i5.58233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i5.58233
Dangar S, Asoka A and Mishra V. 2021. Causes and implications of groundwater depletion in India: A review. Journal of Hydrology 596: 126103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126103
Devineni N, Perveen S and Lall U. 2022. Solving groundwater depletion in India while achieving food security. Nature Communications 13(1): 3374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31122-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31122-9
Dupare B, Billore S D and Joshi O. 2010. Farmers’ problems associated with cultivation of soybean in Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 4: 67–74.
Farah A A, Mohamed M A, Musse O S H and A N Bile. 2025. The multifaceted impact of climate change on agricultural productivity: A systematic literature review of SCOPUS- indexed studies (2015–2024). Discover Sustainability 6: 397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01229-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01229-2
Hodgkin T, Rana R, Tuxill J, Didier B, Subedi A, Mar I, Karamura R, Valdivia R, Colledo L, Latournerie L, Sadiki M, Sawadogo M, Brown A H D and Jarvis D. 2005. Seed systems and crop genetic diversity in agro-ecosystems. (In) International Conference of Medicinal Plants, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5–7 Dec 2005 -IPGRI.1p. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/67499
Iiyama, M, Mukuralinda A, Ndayambaje J D, Musana B S, Ndoli A, Mowo J G, Garrity D, Ling S and Ruganzu V. 2018. Addressing the paradox-The divergence between smallholders’ preference and actual adoption of agricultural innovations. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 16(6): 472–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1539384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1539384
Indoria A K, Sharma K L, Reddy K S and Rao C S. 2016. Role of soil physical properties in soil health management and crop productivity in rainfed systems–II. Management technologies and crop productivity. Current Science 110(3): 320–28. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v110/i3/320-328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v110/i3/320-328
Jain A and Dannenberg S. 2018. The future of water use: Scenarios for water management in Telangana–strengthening local governance in the minor irrigation sector. (In) Envisioning Uncertain Futures, pp. 135–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25074-4_8
Peperhove R, Steinmuller K and Dienel H L (Eds). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-25074-4_8
Jalonen R, Valette M, Boshier D, Duminil J and Thomas E. 2018. Forest and landscape restoration severely constrained by a lack of attention to the quantity and quality of tree seed: Insights from a global survey. Conservation Letters 11(4): e12424. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12424
Justine P, Csorba Á, Ocansey, C M Rotich B, Maket I, Lameck A S, Abdulkadir M, Mohammed Zein M A, Michéli E and Gelsleichter Y A. 2025. Awareness and adoption strategies for improved agricultural practices (IAPs) by smallholder farmers in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania. Discover Sustainability 6: 198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00970-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00970-y
Kala-Satheesh H, Kuriyedath D, Jaleel J, Rahman E, Sathyan A, Khed V, Cariappa A and Krishna V. 2024. Seed market dynamics and diffusion of new wheat varieties in Bihar, India: A supply-side perspective. Agricultural and Food Economics 12: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-024-00330-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-024-00330-w
Karki S, Burton P and Mackey B. 2020. The experiences and perceptions of farmers about the impacts of climate change and variability on crop production: A review. Climate and Development 12(1): 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1603096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1603096
Kerr R. 2025. Amplifying insights: How Logarithmic Bayesianism can validate causation in participatory policymaking methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 24. https://doi. org/10.1177/16094069251394109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251394109
Krueger R A and Casey M A. 2015. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 5th edn. Sage Publications.
Kuchimanchi B R, Nazareth D, Bendapudi R, Awasthi S and D Souza M. 2019. Assessing differential vulnerability of communities in the agrarian context in two districts of Maharashtra, India. Climate and Development 11(10): 918–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1593815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1593815
Kumar M, Panwar S G, Kushwaha R S and Dwivedi V K. 2025. Field survey on evaluation of seed quality traits and storage methods used in the legume crops by the household farmers in Jhansi district of Uttar Pradesh, India. Legume Research-An International Journal 38(2): 194–201. https:// doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00080.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00080.6
Kumar R, Patra M K, Thirugnanavel A, Deka B C, Chatterjee D, Borah T R, G Rajesha, S K Ray, Kumar M and Upadhyay P K. 2018. Comparative evaluation of different integrated farming system models for small and marginal farmers under the Eastern Himalayas. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(11): 1722–29. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i11.84913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i11.84913
Kumar S, Mishra A K, Pramanik S, Mamidanna S and Whitbread A. 2020. Climate risk, vulnerability and resilience: Supporting livelihood of smallholders in semiarid India. Land Use Policy 97: 104729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104729
Malik S and Khan A. 2020. Gap analysis of farmers’ capacity building by public and private agriculture extension sectors in central plain valley of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 36(3): 992–1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/ journal.sja/2020/36.3.992.1000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2020/36.3.992.1000
Meenu. 2025. Declining underground water levels in India: Causes, impacts, and sustainable management. Journal of Sustainable Solutions 2(2): 26–29. https://doi.org/10.36676/j. sust.sol.v2.i2.67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36676/j.sust.sol.v2.i2.67
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. 2024. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2024. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of India. https://agricoop.nic.in (Accessed on Dec, 2025)
Monir M M and Sarker S C. 2024. Analysing post-2000 groundwater level and rainfall changes in Rajasthan, India, using well observations and GRACE data. Heliyon 10(2): e24481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24481
Muddassir M and Alotaibi B A. 2023. Farmers’ awareness of improved maize cropping practices in Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences 12(1): 8–17. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijab/2022.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijab/2022.039
Narayanasamy N. 2009. Participatory rural appraisal: Principles, methods and application. (In) Principles for Knowledge Co- production in Sustainability Research. Sage Publications India Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132108382
Norstrom A V, Cvitanovic C, Lof M.F, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek T A, Bennett E M, Biggs R, Bremond de A, Campbell M B, Canadell G J, Carpenter R S, Folke C, Fulton A E, Gaffney O, Gelcich S, Jouffray B J, Leach M, Tissier Le M , Lopez M B, Louder E, Loutre F M, Meadow M A, Nagendra H, Payne D, Peterson D G, Reyers B, Scholes R, Speranza I C, Spierenburg M, Smith S M, Tengo M, Hel van der S, Putten van I and Osterblom H. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability 3: 182–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
Pal G, Sripathy K V, Kumari K, Tyagi V and Kumar S. 2021. Study on production and supply of quality seed in Eastern Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Social Science 10(3): 231–40. https://doi.org/10.46852/2249-6637.03.2021.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/2249-6637.03.2021.5
Pathak H. 2022. Impact, adaptation, and mitigation of climate change in Indian agriculture. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195(1): 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10537-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10537-3
Pulikkamath A and Shafeek A. 2024. A preliminary analysis and estimation of the status of feed and fodder in Kerala. Heliyon 10: e31200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31200
Raghuvanshi R, Ansari M A and Amardeep. 2017. A study of farmers’ awareness about climate change and adaptation practices in India. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences 3(6): 154–60. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20170306.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20170306.13
Rao P and Filho W L. 2015. Local community perception of climate change and scientific validation: A review of initiatives and perspectives in the Indian region. (In) Climate Change in the Asia-Pacific Region, pp. 89–101. Springer Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14938-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14938-7_6
Singh I, Kaur L, Kamboj V, Astha and Singh A. 2021. Seed replacement rate and management of wheat seed in Amritsar district of Punjab. Agricultural Reviews 44(4): 563–67. DOI: 10.18805/ag.R-2228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2228
Singh R, Kumar A, Burman R R, Singh R K and Keshava. 2025. Viksit Krishi Sankalp Abhiyan: Insights and Outcomes. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. 108p.
Sisodia R and Sharma R. 2022. Bibliometric analysis of peer- reviewed literature on stress factors affecting agricultural productivity. Current Agriculture Research Journal 10(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.10.3.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.10.3.02
Srivastava S K. 2014. Yield gap analysis and the determinants of yield gap in major crops in eastern region of Uttar Pradesh. Economic Affairs 59(4): 653. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4666.2014.00039.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4666.2014.00039.4
Watkins G. 1990. Participatory research: A farmer’s perspective. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5(4): 161–62. https://doi:10.1017/S0889189300003593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300003593
Yigezu Y A, Bishaw Z, Niane A A, Alwang J, Shater El T, Boughlala M, Hassan A A, Tadesse W, Bassi F M, Amri A and Baum M. 2021. Institutional and farm-level challenges limiting the diffusion of new varieties from public and CGIAR centers: The case of wheat in Morocco. Food Security 13: 1359–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01191-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01191-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.