Assessment of livelihood wellbeing and empowerment of hill women through Farmers Producer Organization: A case of women based Producer Company in Uttarakhand

Anirban mukherjee; premlata singh; satyapriya satyapriya; shantanu rakshit; rajarshi roy burman; kumari shubha; shiv kumar

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105945

Authors

Anirban mukherjee ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, 800 014, India
premlata singh ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, 800 014, India
satyapriya satyapriya ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, 800 014, India
shantanu rakshit ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, 800 014, India
rajarshi roy burman ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, 800 014, India
kumari shubha ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, 800 014, India
shiv kumar ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, 800 014, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105945

Keywords:

Agri-business, Farmers Producer Organization, Hill agriculture, Income enhancement, Women empowerment

Abstract

Hill agriculture is different from agriculture at plains, in respect to land type, altitude and climate, in addition to lack of infrastructure and fragmented land holding. Due to lack of employment opportunities hill farmers are leaving agriculture and migrating to plains. Lack of industries and marketing infrastructure has made it more difficult for farmers to excel in farm business. Farmers Producer Company (FPC) has emerged as a new agri-business model and is working in hilly areas it too. With an intention to find out the effectiveness of hill based FPC for enhancing livelihood wellbeing and empowering women farmers in hills the present study was conducted by selecting an women farmer based Organization, Mahila Umang Producer Company (MUPC) of a group of hill rural women. An ex-post facto research design was used. Difference in difference research design was used to calculate the actual impact of FPC. To measure the livelihood wellbeing an index were prepared by following the standard protocol. The study was conducted in Almora district of Uttarakhand from 37 randomly selected members of MUPC and 20 nonmember respondents from the same locale. The MUPC was found effective in enhancing income and empowering hill women. Joining the FPC has improved the hill women’s livelihood in terms of economic, human, and political dimensions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadi T G. 2010. Impact of agricultural marketing cooperative societies in empowering and enhancing rural livelihood in India. Ph D thesis, Division of Agricultural Extension, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Alagh Y K. 2007. On Producer Companies. PRADHAN’S Workshop on Producer Companies.

ASA. 2009. Manual for producer companies-Volume-I and II. Action for Social Advancement (ASA). Prepared for District Poverty Initiatives Programme (DPIP). Madhya Pradesh.

Bindl U K and Parker, S. K. 2011. Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. (In) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization, pp 567-598. American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12170-019

Chandra N, Roy M L, Mukherjee A, Jethi R and Joshi K. 2018a. A study of migration pattern in Kumaun hills and associated socio-economic factors. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development 13(1): 107-112.

Chandra N, Roy M L, Mukherjee A, Jethi R, Joshi P. and Kharbikar H L. 2018b. Information and Communication Technology for Dissemination of Agricultural Information in Hills: A Critical Overview. Indian Journal of Extension Education 54(3): 19-25.

Chauhan S. 2015. Producer Companies in Madhya Pradesh: An evaluative study. International Journal of Recent Research Aspects 2(3): 66–77.

Grover I. 2002. Empowerment of women is a social process. (In) Grover I and Grover D (Eds), empowerment of Women, pp 29-37. SSS Printers, New Delhi.

Kumar S, Roy M L and Mukherjee A. 2018. Marketing behaviour of vegetable growers in Uttarakhand hills. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development. 13(1): 68-74.

Malhotra S P. 2005. Opportunities, challenges and prospects in agriculture and forestry. (In) M L Dewan and Jagdish Bahadur (Eds.). Uttaranchal: Vision and Action Programme. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 54-66.

Mukherjee A, Mondal T, Bisht J K and Pattanayak A. 2018c. Farmers’ preference of fodder trees in mid hills of Uttarakhand: a comprehensive ranking using analytical hierarchy process. Range Mgmt. & Agroforestry 39(1): 115-120.

Mukherjee A, Rakshit S, Nag A, Ray M, Kharbikar H L, Shubha K, Sarkar S, Paul S, Roy S, Maity A, Meena V S and Burman R R. 2016. Climate Change Risk Perception, Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy: An Extension Outlook in Mountain Himalaya. Conservation Agriculture: an approach to combat climate change in Indian Himalaya (J K Bisht, V S Meena, P K Mishra and A Pattanayak. Springer, pp 257- 292. Available at the URL address http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_10

Mukherjee A, Singh P, Ray M, Satyapriya and Burman R R. 2018b. Enhancing farmers income through farmers’ producers companies in India: Status and roadmap. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(8): 1151–61.

Mukherjee A, Singh P, Satyapriya and Burman R R. 2018a. Road map and strategies for effective viable profit making farmer producer companies. ICAR News, January-March: 16-18.

Mukherjee A. 2015. Prioritization of problems in integrated agriculture: a case of Rampur village in sub humid region of Eastern India. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 15(1): 53-59.

Partap T. 1999. Sustainable land management in marginal mountain areas of the Himalayan Region. Mountain Research and Development 19(3): 251-260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25164031

Partap T. 2011. Hill agriculture: Challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(1): 33-52.

Roona. 2009. PRI and Political Socialization Among Rural Women- Mahila Samakhya Experience .(In) Meenu Agrawal and Shobana Nelasco (Eds.). Empowerment of Rural Women in India. New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers and Distributors, p 219.

Saaty T L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Services Sciences 1(1): 83-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Shin J, Taylor M S and Seo M G. 2012. Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees' attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management journal 55(3): 727-748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0325

Singh S. 2008. Producer companies as new generation cooperatives. Economic and Political Weekly 43(20): 22-24.

Tapan N. 2010. Micro-Credit, Self-Help Groups (SHGs) and Women Empowerment. New Delhi: New Century Publications, p 118.