Status of crop raiding caused by wild animals in Lansdowne forest division, Uttarakhand
379 / 800
Keywords:
Agriculture, Boselaphus tragocamelus, Elephas maximus, Human wildlife conflictAbstract
The human-wildlife conflict is one of the serious problems faced by people living in forest fringe villages. This has been a major problem since ages especially for the people residing near the wildlife protected areas but the problem has aggravated over the period of time. After the mid 19th century, it is being considered as a major problem, affecting the social, economic and cultural life of the people especially in the Himalayan region of our country. The aim of our study was to access crop damage by the wild animals in the agricultural areas of Lansdowne forest division of Pauri district of Uttarakhand. Crop damage by the wild animals was found in almost all the study sites (ranges) during the study period.Downloads
References
Bhattarai B P and Basnet K. 2004 Assessment of crop damage by wild ungulates in the eastern side of Barandabhar Corridor Forest, Chitwan. (In) Proceedings of IV National Conference on Science and Technology, pp 23-26.
Gubbi S. 2012 Patterns and correlates of human–elephant conflict around a south Indian reserve. Biological Conservation 148 (1): 88-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.046
Heinen J T. 1993 Park–people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: a socio-economic analysis. Environmental Conservation 20 (1): 25-34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290003719X
Johnson A, Vongkhamheng C, Hedemark M and Saithongdam T. 2006 Effects of human–carnivore conflict on tiger (Panthera tigris) and prey populations in Lao PDR. Animal Conservation 9 (4): 421-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00049.x
Karanth, K K and Nepal S K. 2012 Local residents perception of benefits and losses from protected areas in India and Nepal. Environmental Management 49 (2): 372-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9778-1
Karanth K K,Gopalaswamy A M, Prasad P K and Dasgupta S. 2013. Patterns of human–wildlife conflicts and compensation: Insights from Western Ghats protected areas. Biological Conservation 166: 175-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.027
Kumar A, Bargali H S, David A and Edgaonkar A. 2017. Patterns of crop raiding by wild ungulates and elephants in Ramnagar Forest Division, Uttarakhand. Human–Wildlife Interactions 11(1): 8
Madhusudan M. 2003 Living amidst large wildlife: livestock and crop depredation by large mammals in the interior villages of Bhadra Tiger Reserve, South India. Environmental Management 31: 466–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2790-8
National Crime Reports Bureau, ADSI Report Annual – 2012 Government of India, p 242.
Uttarakhand Palayan Aayog report 2018.
Nyhus P and Ronald T. 2004. Agroforestry, elephants, and tigers: Balancing conservation theory and practice in human-dominated landscapes of Southeast Asia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 104: 87-97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.009
Sillero-Zuberi C, Sukumar R and Treves A. 2007 Living with wildlife: The roots of conflict and the solutions. Oxford University, Oxford, pp 266–72.
Studsrød J E and Wegge P. 1995 Park-people relationships: the case of damage caused by park animals around the Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 22(2):133-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900010183
Treves A and Karanth K U. 2003. Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology 17(6): 1491-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.