Soil physical properties and crop productivity as affected by long-term conservation agriculture under maize (Zea mays) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)system in Indo Gangetic Plains
588 / 370
Keywords:
Bulk density, Hydraulic conductivity, Soil organic carbon, Soil physical health, YieldAbstract
Conservation agriculture (CA) incorporates crop management practices that can enhance productivity while conserving natural resources and improving soil physical properties. To assess this, an experiment was conducted during 2021–22 and 2022–23 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to evaluate soil physical properties and their impact on crop productivity in a long-term CA-based maize (Zea mays L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system, initiated in 2010. The CA-based treatments were zero tillage with and without residue (ZT and ZT + R); permanent broad bed with and without residue (PBB and PBB + R); permanent narrow bed with and without residue (PNB and PNB + R) and conventional tillage (CT). The treatments were laid out under a randomised complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Over the top 15 cm of soil, there was a 7.8% reduction in bulk density (BD) across the residue plots over non-residue plots. Although the highest porosity was observed in PNB + R (36.7%), all CA-based treatments were statistically comparable. Residue application had improved mean weight diameter (MWD) by 34.3% over CT, whereas a 22.6% increase in Ksat was reported in the study due to CA. At the plough layer, the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) was recorded under PBB + R (9.98 g/kg). A decreasing trend in soil properties (i.e. SOC, MWD and Ksat) was observed with increasing depth. Moreover, retaining residue in treatments PBB + R, ZT + R, and PNB + R caused a 13% rise in grain yield compared to treatments where residue was removed (PBB, ZT, PNB, CT). So, the outcomes of the experiment conclude that CA-based farming of maize– wheat cropping system could be practiced as a sustainable option to conserve soil and improve crop productivity in the long run.
Downloads
References
Abdallah A M, Jat H S, Choudhary M, Abdelaty E F, Sharma P C and Jat M L. 2021. Conservation agriculture effects on soil water holding capacity and water-saving varied with management practices and agroecological conditions: A review. Agronomy 11: 1681.
Adam D. 2021. How far will global population rise? Researchers can’t agree. Nature 597: 462–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ d41586-021-02522-6
Bhattacharya P, Bandyopadhyay K K, Krishnan P, Maity P P, Purakayastha T J, Bhatia A, Chakrabarti B and Adak S. 2023. Effect of tillage, residue and nitrogen management on yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 93(11): 1191–96.
Bhattacharya P, Maity P P, Mowrer J, Maity A, Ray M, Das S, Chakrabarti B, Ghosh T and Krishnan P. 2020. Assessment of soil health parameters and application of the sustainability index to fields under conservation agriculture for 3, 6 and 9 years in India. Heliyon 6: e05640.
Bhattacharyya R, Das T K, Pramanik P, Ganeshan V, Saad A A and Sharma A R. 2013. Impacts of conservation agriculture on soil aggregation and aggregate-associated N under an irrigated agroecosystem of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 96: 185–202.
Blake G R and Hartge K H. 1986. Bulk density. (In) Methods Soil Analysis: Part 1- Physical and Mineralogical Methods, pp. 363–75. Klute A (Ed). American Society of Agronomy and the Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA. https:// doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c13
Das T K, Saharawat Y S, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Bandyopadhyay K K, Sharma A R and Jat M L. 2018. Conservation agriculture effects on crop and water productivity, profitability and soil organic carbon accumulation under a maize-wheat cropping system in the North-western Indo- Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 215: 222–31.
E L D Initiative. 2015. Report for Policy and Decision Makers: Reaping Economic and Environmental Benefits from Sustainable Land Management. Economics of Land Degradation (ELD) Initiative, Bonn, Germany.
Ghosh T, Maity P P, Rabbi S M F, Das T K and Bhattacharyya R. 2023. Application of X-ray computed tomography in soil and plant: A review. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11: 1216630.
Ghosh T, Maity P P, Das T K, Krishnan P, Bhatia A, Bhattacharya P and Sharma D K. 2020. Variation of porosity, pore size distribution and soil physical properties under conservation agriculture. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(11): 2051–58.
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, pp. 680. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Gora M K, Jat H S, Ladha J K, Choudhary M, Sharma P C, Yadav A K and Gathala M K. 2024. Enhancing productivity, soil health, and reducing global warming potential through diverse conservation agriculture cropping systems in India's Western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 315: 109476.
Indoria A K, Rao C S, Sharma K L and Reddy K S. 2017. Conservation agriculture- A panacea to improve soil physical health. Current Science 112(1): 52–61.
Jat M L, Gathala M K, Ladha J K, Saharawat Y S, Jat A S, Vipin K, Sharma S K, Virender K and Gupta Raj. 2009. Evaluation of precision land levelling and double zero-till systems in the rice–wheat rotation: Water use, productivity, profitability and soil physical properties. Soil and Tillage Research 105: 112–21.
Jat M L, Debashis C, Ladha J K, Rana D S, Gathala, M K, McDonald A and Gerard B. 2020. Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia. Nature Sustainability 3: 336–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0500-2
Kemper W D and Rosenau R C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. (In) Methods Soil Analysis: Part 1- Physical and Mineralogical Methods, pp. 425–42. Klute A (Ed). American Society of Agronomy and the Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA.
Laborde J P, Wortmann C S, Blanco‐Canqui H, McDonald A J, Baigorria G A and Lindquist J L. 2019. Short‐term impacts of conservation agriculture on soil physical properties and productivity in the midhills of Nepal. Agronomy Journal 111: 2128–39.
Maity P P, Aggarwal P and Dey P. 2011. Modification of hydrothermal regimes through soil management practices. Journal of Agricultural Physics 11: 53–62.
Mandal N, Maity P P, Das T K, Bandyopadhyay K K, Adak S, Sarkar A, Bhattacharyya R, Sen S, Pillai S N and Chakrabarti B. 2025. Long-term conservation agriculture influences ecosystem service in maize-wheat cropping system in the north-western Indo-Gangetic plain. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 19: 101720.
Mendiburu F D and Simon R. 2007. Agricolae- A Free Statistical Library for Agricultural Research. Iowa State University, Ames.
Mishra R D and Ahmed M. 1987. Manual on Irrigation Agronomy, pp. 224–47. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company Private Limited, New Delhi, India.
Raj R, Das T K, Chakraborty D, Bhattacharyya R, Babu S, Govindasamy P and Sharma T. 2023. Soil physical environment and active carbon pool in rice–wheat of South Asia: Impact of long-term conservation agriculture practices. Environmental Technology and Innovation 29: 102966.
Sarkar A, Maity P P, Ray M, Chakraborty D, Das B and Bhatia A. 2023. Inclusion of fractal dimension in four machine learning algorithms improves the prediction accuracy of mean weight diameter of soil. Ecological Informatics 74: 101959.
Sithole N J, Magwaza L S and Thibaud G R. 2019. Long-term impact of no-till conservation agriculture and N-fertilizer on soil aggregate stability, infiltration and distribution of C in different size fractions. Soil and Tillage Research 190: 147–56.
Thierfelder C and Wall P C. 2010. Rotations in conservation agriculture systems of Zambia: Effects on soil quality and water relations. Experimental Agriculture 46: 1–17.
Tripathi S C, Chander S and Meena R P. 2015. Effect of residue retention, tillage options and timing of N application in rice–wheat cropping system. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 13(1): 37–49.
Walkley A and Black I A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29–38.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.