Performance of herbicides on effective weed management in soybean (Glycine max) crop
470 / 196
Keywords:
Economics, Herbicide, Soybean, Weeds, YieldAbstract
Field experiment was conducted to study the efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides in the soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). The selected herbicides were applied individually or in combination in soybean. A series of experiments were conducted during 2013 to 2017. Application of quizalofop-p-ethyl + chlorimuron ethyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + chlorimuron ethyl along with surfactant at 15 days after sowing (DAS) were found effective herbicides for control of broad leaf weed and grasses in soybean crop. It was observed that post-emergence application of quizolofop-p-ethyl (50 g a.i.) + chlorimuron ethyl (6 g a.i./ha) significantly reduce the weed population (8/m2), weed dry matter (2.3), weed index (0) and highest weed control efficiency (92.9%) and grain yield (1.77 t/ha) at 45 DAS followed by fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (50 g a.i.) + chlorimuron ethyl (6 g a.i./ha) compared to other treatments. Application of quizolofop-p-ethyl (50 g a.i.) + chlorimuron ethyl (6 g a.i./ha) was found to minimize the loss (44.06%) caused by weeds and there by improve the uptake of water, air, and nutrition by the crop plants. Further, application of quizalofopp- ethyl + chlorimuron ethyl + surfactant enhanced the number of nodule/plant (52.00), nodule diameter (5.00 mm) and nodule weight (187.2 mg/plant) followed by fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + chlorimuron ethyl + surfactant as compared to other treatments. Highest yield was recorded in the plants treated with quizalofop-p-ethyl + chlorimuron ethyl + surfactant in combination compared to other treatments. Quizalofop-p-ethyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + chlorimuron ethyl along with surfactant were found to highly comparable in terms of price and yield compared to other methods of weed control including hand weeding. This combination can be recommended for the control of both broad and narrow leaf weed the soybean crop.
Downloads
References
Billore S D, Josh O P and Ramesh A 2001. Effect of herbicides on nodulation, yield and weed control in soybean. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciencies 71: 193–194.
Chandel A S and Saxena S C 2001. Effect of some new post-emergence herbicides on weed parameters and seed yield of soybean. Indian Journal of Agronomy 46(2): 332–338.
Channappagoudar B B and Biradar. N 2007. Physiological approaches for weed management in soybean and redgram (4:2rp) intercropping system. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science 20(2): 241–244.
Das T K. 2015. Weed Science, Basic and Application. Jain Brothers, New Delhi India, p 424.
Dhonde M B, Kate S R, Pandure B S and Tambe A D. 2009. Integrated weed management in pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 41(1&2): 102–105
Kachroo D, Dixit A K and Bali A S. 2003. Weed management in oilseed crops- A Review. Sher-e- Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology Journal of Research 2(1): 1–12.
Kishinevsky B, Lobel R, Lifshitz N and Gurfd D. 1998. Effects of some commercial herbicides on rhizobia and their symbiosis with peanuts. Weed Research. 28: 291–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1988.tb00806.x
Lamptey S, Yeboah S, Sakodie1 K and Berdjour A. 2015. Growth and yield response of soybean under different weeding regimes. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. 3(2): 155–163.
Mani V S, Malla M L, Gautam K C and Bhagwndas. 1973 Weed killing chemicals in potato cultivation. Indian Farm (VXXII): 17–18.
Habimana S, Murthy K N, Shankaralingappa B C, Devendra R, Sanjya M T and Ramachandra C. 2013a. Effect of pre and post emergence herbicides on weed dynamics growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.). Advances in Applied Science and Research 4(4): 72–75.
Habimana S, Murthy K N, Shankaralingappa B C, Sanjya M T and Ramachandra C. 2013b. Efficiency and economics of weed control with pre- and post-emergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max L.). Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research 3(4): 18–20.
Odeleye F O, Odeleye O M O and Dada O A. 2007. The performance of soybean (Glycine max L.) under varying weeding regimes in South Western Nigeria. Agrobot. Cluj 35(1): 1842–4309.
Pandey A K, Joshi O P and Billore S D. 2007. Effect of herbicidal weed control on weed dynamics and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Soybean Research 5:26–32.
Sharma P B. 2000. Quizalofop-ethyl: An efficient herbicide,against grassy weeds of soybean. Pestology 24(4): 60–62.
Jha A K and Soni M. 2013. Weed management by sowing methods and herbicides in soybean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 45(4): 250–252.
Basu T K and Sengupta A 2012. Efficacy of new herbicide molecule imazethapyr on weed control in soybean. Journal of Crop and Weed 8(1): 137–140.
Kudsk P. 2008. Optimising herbicide dose: a straight forward approach to reduce the risk of side effects of herbicides. Environmentalist 28: 49–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9041-8
Penner D. 2000. Activator adjuvants. Weed Technology 14: 785–791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0785:AA]2.0.CO;2
Rashed-Mohassel M H, Aliverdi A and Ghorbani R. 2009. Effects of a magnetic field and adjuvant in the efficacy of cycloxydim and clodinafop-propargyl on the control of wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Biol Manag 9: 300–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2009.00354.x
Singh S, Punia S S, Balyan R S and Malik R K. 2008b. Efficacy of tribenuron-methyl applied alone and tank mix against broad-leaf weeds of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science 40: 109–120.
Singh S, Yadav A K and Balyan R S. 2008. Evaluation of AE F130060 and MKH 6561 for weed control in wheat. IndianJournal of Weed Science 40: 201–204.
Walia U S, Kaur Tarundeep, Nayyar Shelly and Singh K. 2010. Performance of carfentrazone-ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25% WDG- A formulated herbicide for total weed control in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 42: 155–158.
www.iisrindore.icar.gov.in/pd/doc/soybeanmonitor March 2018 Pdf pp.1-9
Young B G and Hart S E. 1998. Optimizing foliar activity of isoxaflutole on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) with various adjuvants. Weed Science 46: 397–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500090792
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.