Effect of integrated nutrient management on mungbean (Vigna radiata) under custard apple (Annona squamosa) based agri-horti system in Vindhyan region, Uttar Pradesh

MALATI DEBBARMA; RAM SWAROOP MEENA; S P SINGH; AJEET SINGH; SUNIL KUMAR; D S GURJAR; BHANUPRIYA PANKAJ

doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i10.107987

Authors

MALATI DEBBARMA Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
RAM SWAROOP MEENA Assistant Professor and corresponding author, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
S P SINGH Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
AJEET SINGH Ph D scholar, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh
SUNIL KUMAR Ph D scholar, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
D S GURJAR Senior Scientist, Water Technology Centre, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
BHANUPRIYA PANKAJ Ph D scholar, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i10.107987

Keywords:

Biochar, FYM, Mungbean, Nutrient, Pressmud, RDF, Vermicompost, Yield

Abstract

Agroforestry is recognized as most diversified sustainable system to support farmers income. In order to assess the effect of nutrient management system under agro forestry based cropping system, a field study was conducted during kharif season of 2017 on mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] at the Agricultural Research Farm, Rajiv Gandhi South Campus, Banaras Hindu University, Barkachha, Mirzapur (UP). The experimental trial was conducted in simple RBD with four replications and six treatments, viz. 75% RDF+ Rhizobium, 75% RDF+ Biochar+ Rhizobium, 100% RDF+ Rhizobium, 75% RDF+ FYM+ Rhizobium, 75% RDF+ Vermicompost+ Rhizobium and 75% RDF + pressmud+ Rhizobium. Results revealed that highest growth parameters such as plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, trifoliate leaves, chlorophyll content, root nodules/plant and dry weight of root nodules and yield attributes and was observed with the application of 75% RDF + pressmud+ Rhizobium than other nutrient sources. Furthermore, highest gross return, net return was observed with the application of 75% RDF + vermicompost + Rhizobium. However, highest B:C ratio was observed with the application of 100% RDF + Rhizobium.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agegnehu G, Adrian M Bass, Paul Nelson N and Michael Bird I. 2016. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar-compost for soil quality, maize, yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Science of the Total Environment 543: 295-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054

Ali M A, Abbas G, Mohy-Ud-Din Q, Ullah K, Abbas G and Aslam M. 2010. Response of mungbean (Vigna radiata) to phosphatic fertilizer under arid climate. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 20(2): 83-86.

Chattopadhyay A and Dutta D. 2003. Response of vegetable cowpea to phosphorus and biofertilizers in old alluvial zone of west Bengal. Legume Research 26(1): 196-199.

Chhonkor P K. 2002. Soil research in India. Some oversights and failures. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 50(4): 382-432.

Ashoka P, Meena R S, Kumar S, Yadav G S and Layek J. 2017. Green nanotechnology is a key for eco-friendly agriculture. Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 4440-4441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.117

DASE. 2018. Directorate of Agriculture Statistics and Economics, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

Dhakal Y, Meena R S, De N, Verma S K, Singh A. 2015. Growth, yield and nutrient content of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in response to INM in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 44(3): 479-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v44i3.38559

Dhakal Y, Meena R S and Kumar S. 2016. Effect of INM on nodulation, yield, quality and available nutrient status in soil after harvest of greengram. Legume Research 39(4): 590-594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9435

Giraddi R S, Babalad H B and Chandaragi D M. 2006. Vermicompost technology. Technical Bulletin, University of Agriculture Sciences. Dharwad and DBT, New Delhi, pp 1-6.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1976. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2ndedn. John Willey and Sons Inc, New York, USA.

Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero M A and Sonoki T. 2014. Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences11: 6613–6621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6613-2014

Jose S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforest System 76:1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7

Kumar S, Meena R S and Bohra J S. 2018. Interactive effect of sowing dates and nutrient sources on dry matter accumulation of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Oilseed Brassica 9(1): 72-76.

Meena RS, Kumar S, Datta R, Lal R, Vijaykumar V, Brtnicky M, Sharma M P, Yadav G S, Jhariya M K, Jangir C K, Pathan S I, Dokulilova T, Pecina V, Marfo T D. 2020. Impact of agrochemicals on soil microbiota and management: A review. Land (MDPI) 9(2):34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9020034

Meena R S, Kumar V, Yadav G S and Mitran T. 2018. Response and interaction of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in thesoybean rhizosphere: A review. Plant Growth Regulation 84:207-223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0334-8

Meena RS, Lal R, Yadav GS. 2020a. Long term impacts of topsoil depth and amendments on soil physical and hydrological properties of an Alfisol in Central Ohio, USA. Geoderma 363:1141164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114164

Meena RS, Lal R and Yadav G S. 2020b. Long-term impact of topsoil depth and amendments on carbon and nitrogen budgets in the surface layer of an Alfisol in Central Ohio. Catena 194 :104752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104752

Nair P R, Nair V D, Kumar B M and Halie S G. 2009. Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: a feasibility appraisal. Environmental Science & Policy 12(8): 1099-1111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.010

Pandya C B and Bhatt V R. 2007. Effect of different nutrient levels on yield and nutrient content of fodder cowpea. Legumes Research 30: 218-220.

Pathak K, Kalita M K, Barman U, Hararik B N and Saha N N. 2001. Response of summer mungbean (Vigna radiata) to inoculation and nitrogen level in Barak Valley Zone of Assam. Annuals of Agricultural Research 22(1): 123-124.

Rathore V S, Singh J P, Soni M L and Beniwal R K. 2007. Effect of nutrient management on growth, productivity and nutrient uptake of rainfed clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragololoba) in arid region. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77 (6): 349-353.

Singh B and Pareek R G. 2003. Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers on growth and yield of mungbean. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 16: 31-33.

Singh Q, Sekhon H S, Ram H and Sharma P. 2010. Effect of farmyard manure, phosphorus and phosphate solubilizing bacteria on nodulation, growth and yield of kabuli chickpea. Journal of Food Legume 23(3&4): 226-229.

Suman Dahama A K and Poonia S L. 2007. Effect of balanced fertilization on growth and yield of greengram [Phaseolus radiate (L.) Wilczek]. Haryana Journal of Agronomy 23: 118-119.