Selection indices for identifying heat tolerant of maize (Zea mays)


Abstract views: 177 / PDF downloads: 188

Authors

  • NINGTHAIPUILU LONGMEI ICAR-Indian Institutes of Maize, Ludhiana, Punjab
  • G K GILL Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab
  • R KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institutes of Maize, Ludhiana, Punjab
  • P H ZAIDI International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Asia regional office, Hyderabad

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i1.108617

Keywords:

Correlation, Heat stress, Stress tolerance indices, Zea mays

Abstract

Drought and heat stress have become the most prevailing problems for maize (Zea mays L.) crop production. Therefore, development of stress tolerance has become an essential goal in a breeding programme. Hence, an experiment was conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab to identify heat tolerant DH lines in maize during spring season, 2016 and 2017. A total of 32 DH lines were evaluated under heat stress and non-stress conditions. Five stress tolerance indices such as Tolerance Index (TOL), Mean Productivity (MP), Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP), Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI) and Stress Tolerance Index (STI) were calculated based on grain yield under heat stress (Ys) and non-stress conditions (Yp). Grain yield under stress condition showed a negative significant association with TOL and SSI while positive significant correlation with MP, GMP and STI. Similarly, grain yield under non stress condition showed positive significant association with TOL, MP, GMP and STI. Based on two years data and using MP, GMP and STI, DH line DH_4_23 and DH_4_47 were found to be the most heat tolerant. These lines may be used as a potential source for heat stress tolerance and can be further used in heat stress tolerant breeding programme.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali M B and El-Sadek A N. 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Communication Biometry Crop Science 11: 77–89.

Alvarado M, López M and Vargas A. 2015. META-R (multi environment trail analysis with R for windows) Version 4.1: 6–8, http://hdl.handle.net/11529/10201.

Ankit S, Rawat R S, Verma J S and Jaiswal J P. 2013. Correlation and heat susceptibility index analysis for terminal heat tolerance in bread wheat. Journal of Central European Agriculture 14: 57–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/14.2.1233

Dass S, Singh I, Parihar C M, Kual J, Singode A and Singh D K. 2010. Abiotic stressess in maize: Some issues and solutions. Indian Maize. Directorate of Maize Research Pusa Campus, New Delhi.

FAO. 2016. FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Farooq M, Bramley H, Palta J A and Siddique K H M. 2011. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain filling phases. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30: 491–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.615687

Farshadfar E and Sutka J. 2002. Multivariate analysis of drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) substitution lines. Cereal Research Communications 31: 33–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543247

Fernandez G J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. (In) Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, August 13–16, Taiwan, pp. 257–70.

Figueiredo I C R D, Pinto C A B P and Ribeiro G H M R. 2015. Efficiency of selection in early generations of potato families with a view toward heat tolerance. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 15: 210–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332015v15n4a37

Fischer R A and Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. I grain yield response. Austrian Journal of Agricultural Research 29: 897–912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897

Hoffmann S, Debreczeni K, Hoffmann B and Nagy E. 2006. Grain yield and baking quality of wheat as affected by crop year and plant nutrition. Cereal Research Communications 34: 473–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.34.2006.1.118

Hossain A, Teixeira da Silva J A, Lozovskaya M V, Zvolinsky V P and Mukhortov V I. 2012. High temperature combined with drought affect rainfed spring wheat and barley in south-eastern Russia: Yield, relative performance and heat susceptibility index. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 4: 184–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.07.005

Hossain A and Teixeira da Silva J A. 2012. Phenology, growth and yield of three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties as affected by high temperature stress. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 4: 97–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb437879

Johnson C. 2000. Ag Answers: Post pollination period critical to maize yields. Agricultural Communication Service, Purdue University.

Karami A A, Ghanadha M R, Naghavi M R and Mardi M. 2006. Identification drought tolerance varieties in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Science 37(2): 371–79.

Khalili M, Kazemi H and Shakiba M R. 2004. Evaluation of drought resistance indices in growth different gtages of maize late genotypes. The 8th Iranian Crop Production and Breeding Congress, Gilan, Iran, August 25–27, pp. 41.

Khodarahmpour Z, Choukan R, Bihamta M R and Majidi H E. 2011. Determination of the best heat stress tolerance indices in maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines and hybrids under Khuzestan Province conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 13: 111–12.

Moghadam A and Hadizadeh M H. 2002. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids and their parental lines to drought using different stress tolerance indices. Seed and Plant 18(3): 255–72.

Naveed M, Ahsan M, Akram H M, Aslam M and Ahmed N. 2016. Genetic Effects Conferring Heat Tolerance in a Cross of Tolerant × Susceptible Maize (Zea mays L.) Genotypes. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00729

Nouri A, Etminan A, Teixeira da Silva J A and Mohammadi R. 2011. Assessment of yield, yield-related traits and drought tolerance of durum wheat genotypes (Triticum turjidum var. durum Desf.). Austrian Journal of Crop Science 5: 8–16.

Qiang L, Zheng-rui W, Ding L, Jian-wei W, Wen-chen Q, Xiang-hai M, Shu-luan S, Hui-min L, Ming-hui Z, Xiu-min C and Feng-wu Z. 2018. Evaluation of a new method for quantification of heat tolerance in different wheat cultivars. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17(4): 786–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61716-7

Rincon-Tuexi J A and Lopez-Santillan C N S. 2006. High temperature and water stress during flowering in tropical corn populations. Phytonology 75: 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2006.75.031

Rosielle A A and Hamblin J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science 21: 943–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x

SAS Institute Inc. 2011. Base SAS 9.3 procedure guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

Singh S, Sengar R S, Kulshreshtha N, Datta D and R S Tomar. 2015. Assessment of multiple tolerance indices for salinity stress in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science 7: 49–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n3p49

Souri J, Dehghani H and Sabaghpour S H. 2005. Study pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in water stress condition. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 36(6): 1517–27.

Tesfaye K, Zaidi P H, Gbegbelegbe S, Boeber C, Rahut D B, Getaneh F, Seetharam K, Erenstein O and Stirling C. 2016. Climate change impacts and potential benefits of heat tolerant maize in South Asia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 130: 959–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1931-6

Wiegand C La and Cuellar J A. 1981. Duration of grain filling and kernel weight of wheat as affected by temperature. Crop Science 21: 95–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X001100010027x

Downloads

Submitted

2020-12-16

Published

2023-01-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LONGMEI, N., GILL, G. K., KUMAR, R., & ZAIDI, P. H. (2023). Selection indices for identifying heat tolerant of maize (Zea mays). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i1.108617
Citation