Optimization of functional components of the developed planters for high-density cotton


250 / 123

Authors

  • T SENTHILKUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Regional Centre, Coimbatore,Tamil Nadu 641 007, India
  • K SANKARANARAYANAN Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Coimbatore 641 003, Tamil Nadu.
  • S J K ANNAMALAI Former Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultrual Engineering, Regional Centre, Coimbatore 641 007

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i12.110315

Keywords:

Cotton, High-density planting, Planter, Seeder

Abstract

High-density planting of cotton at recommended spacing of 60×10 cm facilitates mechanical harvesting of cotton since the system increases the height of lowest boll. Considering the non-availability and poor penetration of planters in the high-density cotton farms in the country which is tedious and labourious, a study was undertaken to optimize the functional components of the existing five planters so as to enhance availability of the planter for high-density planting of cotton. Observations were taken on intra-row spacing at a strip of 8 m length for each treatment. From the results, it was concluded that the CIAE tractor operated pneumatic planter and CIAE inclined plate planter were the ideal planters among the selected ones for high-density planting system of cotton.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annonymous. 2012. CICR News Letter, 28(2), April - June, 2012

Annonymous. 2014. CICR Annual Report, 2013-14

Darawsheh K, D Chachalis, G Aivalakis and E M Khah. 2009. Cotton row spacing and plant density cropping systems. Effects on seedcotton yield, boll components and lint quality. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 7(3&4): 262–265.

Ernest L Clawson, J Tom Cothren, and David C Blouin. 2006. Nitrogen fertilization and yield of cotton in ultra-narrow and conventional row spacings. Agron. J. 98:72–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0033

Robinson J R C. 1993. Narrow row cotton: economics and history. p. 133–137. (In) Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf.,New Orleans, LA. 10–14 Jan. 1993. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.

Shiddanagouda Yadachi, Indra Mani, M S Kalra, Adarsh Kumar and P K Sahoo. 2013. Journal of Agricultural Engineering April – June, 50(2): 10-16.

Silvertooth J C, Edmisten K L and McCarty W H. 1999. Production practices. (In) Cotton: Origin, History, Technology and Production, pp 451-88. W C Smith and J T Cothren. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.

Wilson D G Jr. 2006. Evaluation of weed management and the agronomic utility of cotton grown on a 15-inch row configuration. Ph D Diss., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 144 p.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-02-09

Published

2021-02-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SENTHILKUMAR, T., SANKARANARAYANAN, K., & ANNAMALAI, S. J. K. (2021). Optimization of functional components of the developed planters for high-density cotton. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(12), 2313-2316. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i12.110315
Citation