Evaluation of management practices against bollworms in cotton


Abstract views: 178 / PDF downloads: 87

Authors

  • SUMAN DEVI Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India
  • PALA RAM Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India
  • KRISHNA ROLANIA Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India
  • AJAY KUMAR Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i1.110942

Keywords:

Cotton, Incidence, Management practices, Pink bollworm, Spotted bollworm

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Entomology Research Area, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the management practices, viz. use of botanical pesticides, Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) release and intercropping with sesame were evaluated alone and in different combination against spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella Saunders (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in cotton during 2016-17. From investigation, it was concluded that all practices, either alone or in combinations, provided significantly better control of spotted bollworm and pink bollworm than the control. The results revealed that lowest incidence of spotted bollworm (10.09 and 8.10%) recorded in treatment T2 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/acre) which was found at par with the treatment T3 (Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 ml/ acre alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.13 and 9.14%, and T6 (Intercropping cotton with sesame + Release of T. chilonis adults alternated with nimbecidine) i.e. 10.14 and 8.41% during 2016-17, respectively. The Results on boll and locule basis, the significant lowest incidence of pink bollworm was recorded under treatment T2 (2.67 and 2.00%, 20.00 and 13.00%) and it was at par with T6 (2.89 and 2.53%; 21.33 and 14.36%) during 2016 and 2017, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2017a. Area, Production and Yield of Principal Crops and Yield Rates of Principal Crops. Directorate of Agriculture Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.

Anonymous. 2017b. All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Cotton (Annual Report). CICR, Coimbatore, India.

Ahmad N, Sarwar M and Wagan M S. 2011. Conservation of bio control agents in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Field by food supplements for insect pests management. The Nucleus 48(3): 255–60.

Asif M U, Muhammad R, Akbar W, Sohail M, Tariq J A and Ismail M. 2018. Comparative efficacy of Neem derivatives and imidacloprid against some cotton pests. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 6(3): 113–17.

Bennett R M, Ismael Y, Kambhampati U and Morse S. 2004. Economic impact of genetically modified cotton in India. Journal of Agro-biotechnology Management & Economics 7(3): 96–100.

Brar K S, Sekhon B S, Singh J, Shenhmar M and Singh J. 2002. Biocontrol based management of cotton bollworms in the Punjab. Journal of Biological Control 16(2): 121–24.

Chinna B N V, Nagrare V S, Subbireddy K B, Kumbhare S, Wawdhane P and Prabhulinga T. 2019. Management of cotton pink boll worm Pectinophora gossypiella (saunders) with Trichogramma bactrae and T. brasiliensis. Indian Journal of Entomology 81(4): 744–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2019.00178.0

Dawkar V V, Barage S H, Barbole R S, Fatangare A, Grimalt S, Haldar S, Heckel D G, Gupta V S, Thulasiram H V, Svatos A and Giri A P. 2019. Azadirachtin-A from Azadirachta indica impacts multiple biological targets in cotton bollworm, Helicoverp aarmigera. ACS Omega 4: 9531–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03479

Gavi D, Ocen D, Lubadde G and Serunjogi L. 2017. Efficacy of bio and synthetic pesticides against the American bollworm and their natural enemies on cotton. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17(1): 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ujas.v17i1.7

Godhani P H, Patel R M, Jani J J, Yadav D N, Korat D M and Patel B H. 2009. Impact of habitat manipulation on insect pests and their natural enemies in hybrid cotton. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 22(1): 104–07.

Karabhantanal S S, Bheemanna M and Patil B V. 2007. Management of sucking pests and bollworms in cotton. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 21(2): 253–56.

Nboyine J A, Abudulai M and Opare-Atakora D Y. 2013. Field efficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) based biopesticides for the management of insect-pests of cotton in Northern Ghana. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 1(4): 321–27.

Patil S B, Goyal A, Satish S, Chitgupekar, Kumar S and Mustapha B. 2017. Sustainable management of chickpea pod borer. Agronomy Sustainable Development 37: 20–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0428-8

Ram P, Sharma S S and Saini R K. 2002. Role of egg parasitism by Trichogramma chilonis Ishii to control Helicoverpa armigera in cotton-sesame intercropping. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 16 (1): 107–09.

Singh B. 2005. ‘Evaluation of management practices against bollworms and their effect on sucking pests in cotton’. M. Sc. Thesis, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University Hisar, Haryana, India.

Yadav G A, Bhosle B B, Bhede B V, Bhute N K and Chavan S T. 2008. Bioefficacy of new formulation of Spinosad 45 SC against bollworm complex in cotton. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 36: 75–79.

Yogesh P. 2013. Utilization of newer insecticides for management of cotton bollworms. International Journal of Plant Protection 2(6): 367–37.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-03-02

Published

2021-03-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DEVI, S., RAM, P., ROLANIA, K., & KUMAR, A. (2021). Evaluation of management practices against bollworms in cotton. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(1), 132–136. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i1.110942
Citation