Revealing genetic diversity of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) for yield improvement


Abstract views: 566 / PDF downloads: 92

Authors

  • SURENDER SINGH Amity Institute of Organic Agriculture, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida 201 313, India
  • RASHMI YADAV ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • NALEENI RAMAWAT Amity Institute of Organic Agriculture, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida 201 313, India
  • J C RANA ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • H L RAIGER ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • RAKESH BHARDWAJ ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • B L MEENA ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i1.110957

Keywords:

Genetic variability, Mustard, Quantitative traits, Yield

Abstract

The study was carried out during rabi 2015-17 to understand the nature and magnitude of genetic variability and character association of 45 accessions of Indian mustard. These accessions were evaluated for 16 quantitative traits under standard package of practices. The results indicated high PCV and GCV for 1000 seed weight, stover nitrogen uptake (STNU) and seed nitrogen uptake (SNU) while it was low for NUE. High heritability coupled with high genetic advance as percent of mean was observed for 1000 seed weight, STNU and oil content which indicates the involvement of additive gene action, thus feasibility of improvement through simple selection. Seed yield had a positive and significant correlation with seed uptake efficiency, nitrogen harvest index and NUE. First five principal components gave eigenvalues >1.0 and cumulatively expressed 80.67% of the total variation (Table 2). PCA exhibited that plant height, NBP, number of siliquae in the main branch, nitrogen (%) in seed, total nitrogen (%), SNU and seed yield (Kg/ha) were among the most important traits accounting for more than 50% phenotypic variation. Therefore, these quantitative traits should be considered to enhance yield potential as they will be beneficial to develop promising varieties. Accessions such as IC67693, IC277700, IC268336 and RH-30 were identified to be distantly plotted on the dendrogram, thus more diverse in nature. Donors for various traits were also determined based on their pooled performance e.g. IC267693, IC338494, IC571625, IC339605 and IC571654 for seed yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akabari V R and Niranjana M. 2015. Genetic variability and trait association studies in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 11(1): 35–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/11.1/35-39

Allard R W. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York. pp-885.

Anonymous. 2016–17. Executive Summary Rapeseed Mustard crop survey. http://www.storage.unitedwebnetwork.com.

Anonymous. 2017–18. Data of Rapeseed and Mustard. https:// www.srmr.org.in/nbc

Arifullah M, Munir M, Mahmood A, Ajmal K S and Hassanul F. 2013. Genetic analysis of some yield attributes in Indian mustard (B. juncea L.). African Journal of Plant Science 7: 219–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS12.031

Burton G W. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceedings of International Grassland Congress 1: 277–83.

Devi B. 2018. Correlation and path analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) in agro-climatic conditions of Jhansi (U.P.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4): 407–13.

Duzyaman E. 2005. Phenotypic diversity within a collection of distinct okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) cultivars derived from Turkish land races. Genetic Resource and Crop Evolution. 52: 1019–03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-004-6118-9

Johnson H W, Robinson H F and Comstock R E. 1995. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in Soyabean. Agronomy Journal 47: 314–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x

Karimi H R, Zamani Z, Ebadi A and Fatahi M R. 2009. Morphological diversity of Pistacia species in Iran. Genet Resource and Crop Evolution 56: 561–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9386-y

Khan N, Farhatullah I H K, Naheed H and Abid S. 2015. Heritability and Genetic Advance Studies for Biochemical Traits in F2-3 Introgressed Families of Brassica. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47(3): 883–88.

Kumar A, Dharamvir, Kumar M, Jangra M and Kumar N. 2018. Growth and development of Rapeseed Mustard and other field crops under different sowing dates. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience 6(6): 144–56 http://dx.doi. org/10.18782/2320-7051.7101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.7101

Lozada D N, Ward B P and Carter A H. 2020. Gains through selection for grain yield in a winter wheat breeding program. PLoS One 15(4): e0221603. http://doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0221603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221603

Mansyah E, Muas I, Jawal A S M and Sobir. 2010. Morphological variability of apomictic mangosteen (Gurcinia mangostana L.) in Indonesia: morphological evidence of natural populations from Sumatra and Java. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 42: 1–8.

Neyhart J L, Lorenz A J and Smith K P. 2019. Multi-trait Improvement by Predicting Genetic Correlations in Breeding Crosses. G3 (Bethesda) 9(10): 3153–65. https://doi:10.1534/ g3.119.400406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400406

Pandey R, Kumar B and Kumar M. 2013. Genetic divergence for quantitative traits in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences. 13(3): 348–51.

Panse V G and Sukhatme P V. 1954. Statistical methods of Agricultural workers, ICAR Publication, New Delhi.

Rashmi Yadav, Ranbir Singh, Sandeep Kumar, TV Prasad, Rakesh Bharadwaj, Vikender Kaur, Anitha Petapadi and Ashok Kumar. 2017. Genetic Diversity Among Indigenous Germplasm of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss, Using Agro-Morphological and Phenological Traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 87(4): 1125–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0689-4

Rashmi Yadav, Laxman Prasad, J Nanjundan, A K Tewari, Paramjeet Singh, PS Sandhu, Usha Pant, Ram Avtar, J Radhamani, Sandeep Kumar Mahesh Rao and J C Rana. 2018. Identification and evaluation of Indian mustard genotypes for white rust resistance and agronomic performance. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 78(1): 81–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2018.00009.3

Sharif R H, Paul R K, Bhattacharjya D K and Ahmed K U. 2017.Physicochemical characters of oilseeds from selected mustard genotypes. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 15(1): 27–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v15i1.33527

Synrem G J, Rangare N R, Myrthong I, Bhusal T N and Bahadure D M. 2015. Estimation of heterosis for seed yield and yield attributing traits in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L czern & coss.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 6: 274–81.

Thakral N K, Neeru, Avtar R and Singh A. 2014. Evaluation and classification of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) accessions using principal component analysis. Journal of Oilseed Brassica 6(1): 167–74.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-03-02

Published

2021-03-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, S., YADAV, R., RAMAWAT, N., RANA, J. C., RAIGER, H. L., BHARDWAJ, R., & MEENA, B. L. (2021). Revealing genetic diversity of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) for yield improvement. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(1), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i1.110957
Citation