Development of extra early field pea genotypes using inter-specific hybridization


305 / 279

Authors

  • A K PARIHAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • G P DIXIT ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • ANIL KUMAR SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • NITIN KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • N P SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i2.111651

Keywords:

Abiotic stress, Biotic stress, Extra earliness, Field pea, Hybridization

Abstract

.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2019. Project coordinators report (2018-19), All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) on MULLaRP, ICAR-IIPR, Kanpur, pp 22.

Berger J D, Ali M, Basu P S, Chaudhary B D, Chaturvedi S K, Deshmukh P S, Dharmaraj P S, Dwivedi S K, Gangadhar G C, Gaur P M and Kumar J. 2006. Genotype by environment studies demonstrates the critical role of phenology in adaptation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to high and low yielding environments of India. Field Crops Research 98(2-3): 230–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.007

Dixit G P, Parihar A K and Gupta S. 2014. Perspectives for increasing fieldpea production in India. Handbook on Minor and Imported Pulses of India-2014, pp 37-39.www. commodityindia.com.

Gowda C L L, Rao P P, Tripathi S, Gaur P M and Deshmukh R B.2009. Regional shift in chickpea production in India. Milestones in Food Legumes Research, pp. 21–35. Ali M and Kumar S (Eds). IIPR, Kanpur.

Gowda C L L, Chaturvedi S K, Gaur P M, Sameer Kumar C V and Jukanti A K. 2015. Pulses research and development strategies for India. Pulses handbook-2015, pp. 17–33. www. commodityIndia.com.

FAOSTAT. 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.

Jeuffroy M H, Lecoeur J and Roche R. 2010. The seed number. Physiology of the pea crop, pp. 104–131. Munier-Jolain N, Biarnès V, Chaillet I, Lecoeur J and Jeuffroy M H (Eds). CRC Pres, Enfield, NH. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b10504-7

Jiang Y, Davis A R, Vujanovic V and Bueckert R A. 2019. Reproductive development response to high daytime temperature in field pea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 205(3): 324–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12328

Lecoeur J and Guilioni L. 2010. Abiotic stresses. Physiology of the Pea Crop, pp 136–81. Munier-Jolain N, Biarnès V, Chaillet I, Lecoeur J and Jeuffroy M H (Eds). CRC Pres, Enfield, NH

Mishra R K, Parihar A K, Singh A K, Mishra M and Dixit G P. 2020. Identification of resistant sources for rust and powdery mildew in Field pea. (In) Abstract: International conference on pulses as the climate smart crops: challenges and opportunities, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, February 10–12, pp 399.

Parihar A K, Bohra A and Dixit G P. 2016. Nutritional benefits of winter pulses with special emphasis on Peas and Rajmash. Biofortification of Food Crops, pp 61–71. Singh U, Praharaj C S, Singh, S S and Singh N P (Eds). Springer, New Delhi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2716-8_6

Parihar A K, Dixit G P, Bohra A, Gupta D S, Singh A K, Kumar N, Singh D and Singh N P. 2020a. Genetic advancement in dry pea (Pisum sativum L.): Retrospect and prospect. Accelerated Plant Breeding, Vol. 3, pp 283-341. Gosal S S and Wani S H (Eds). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47306-8_10

Sadras V O, Lake L, Chenu K, McMurray L S and Leonforte A. 2012. Water and thermal regimes for field pea in Australia and their implications for breeding. Crop and Pasture Science 63(1): 33–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP11321

Downloads

Submitted

2021-04-08

Published

2021-04-08

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

PARIHAR, A. K., DIXIT, G. P., SINGH, A. K., KUMAR, N., & SINGH, N. P. (2021). Development of extra early field pea genotypes using inter-specific hybridization. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(2), 328–330. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i2.111651
Citation