Alternatives to rice-wheat cropping system under partially reclaimed sodic soils
192 / 146
Keywords:
Cropping systems, Diversification, Equivalent yield, Energy use efficiency, Partially reclaimed sodic soils, Water use efficiencyAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2013-14 to 2015-16 at Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Lucknow to find out the alternate to rice (Oryza sativa L.)- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system under partially reclaimed sodic soils. Four cropping systems, viz. rice (Oryza sativa L.)- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)-berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum), sweet basil (tulsi) (Ocimum basilicum L.)-matricaria (Matricaria chamomilla) and chilli (Capsicum spp.)-garlic (Allium sativum) were evaluated in the light of sustainability, potentiality and profitability. Maximum rice equivalent yield (14.21 t/ha) and production efficiency (61.25 kg/ha/day) were recorded with sweet basil-matricaria cropping system whereas, highest land use efficiency (78.35%) was observed under sorghum-berseem fodder based cropping system. Highest water use efficiency (150.72 kg/ha cm) was recorded with chilli-garlic cropping system followed by sweet basil-matricaria, but the total amount of water used was more (125.65 cm) in rice-wheat system. The water requirements of sorghum-berseem, sweet basilmatricaria and chilli -garlic cropping systems were 8.0, 19.8 and 31.8% less than the rice-wheat cropping system. Among the cropping systems evaluated, maximum energy input (27.50 MJ/ ha) and output (314.46 MJ/ha) were analyzed in rice-wheat system. Whereas, maximum energy use efficiency (11.99) was found with sweet basil- matricaria followed by sorghum-berseem (11.91) cropping systems. Highest soil ameliorative potential was established with sweet basil -matricaria cropping system than rest of the cropping systems. Highest net return (₹ 63222/ha) and benefit: cost ratio of 2.74 was deliberated with medicinal and aromatic crop based sweet basil-matricaria cropping system.
Downloads
References
Gupta R K and Abrol I P. 1990. Salt affected soils their reclamation and management for crop production. Advances in Soil Science 11: 223–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3322-0_7
Bhatt R. 2015. ‘Soil water dynamics and water productivity of rice–wheat system under different establishment methods’. Ph D thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
Bhatt R and Kukal S S. 2015. Soil temperature, evaporation and water tension dynamics at upper vadose zone during intervening period. Trends in Biosciences 8(3): 795–800.
Bhatt R, Kukal S S, Busari M A, Arora S and Yadav M. 2016.Sustainability issue on rice-wheat cropping system. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 4: 64–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.12.001
Humphreys E, Kukal S S, Christen E W, Hira G S, Singh B, Yadav S and Sharma R K. 2010. Halting the groundwater decline in north-west India-which crop technologies will be winners? Advances in Agronomy 109: 156–199.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0065-2113 (10)09005-X.
Mandal A K, Sharma R C and Singh G. 2009. Assessment of salt affected soils in India using GIS. Geocarto International 24(6): 437–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10106040902781002
Mishra P N. 1987. German chamomile. (In). Eco-development of alkaline land: a case study, pp 80. T N Khoshoo (Eds). NBRI, Lucknow.
Mittal V K, Mittal J P and Dhawan K C.1985. Research digest on energy requirements in agricultural sector (in) Energy requirement scheme report. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Singh B, Shah Y H, Beebout J, Singh Y and Buresh R J. 2008. Crop residue management for low land rice based cropping systems in Asia. Advances in Agronomy 98: 117–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00203-4
Singh A, Kaur R, Kang J S and Singh G.2012. Weed dynamics in rice-wheat cropping system. Global Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health Sciences 1(1): 7–16.
Swarup A and Singh K N.1989. Effect of 12 years rice- wheat cropping and fertilizer use on soil properties and crop yields in a sodic soil. Field Crop Research 21: 277–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(89)90009-9
Singh Y P, Singh R and Gautam A K. 2008. Effect of nitrogen levels on yield and nutrient uptake by salt tolerant rice and wheat cultivars in gypsum amended sodic soils. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil science 56(1): 86–91.
Subbiah P, Gopalsundaran P and Palaniappan. 1995. Energetics and energy use efficiency of intensive cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40: 398–402.
Thimmappa K, Singh Y P and Raju R.2017. Reclamation of sodic soils in India: An economic impact Assessment. Bioremediation of Salt Affected Soils: An Indian Perspective. S Arora et al. (eds.). DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-48257-6_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48257-6_13
Tomar S S and Tiwari A S.1990. Production potential and economics of different cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35 (1&2): 30–35.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.