Analysis of AtCLV3 promoter and its utilization for expressing cre recombinase in Indian mustard


382 / 231

Authors

  • DEEPA DHATWALIA ICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • R SHUBHRA MAITHREYI ICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • DEEPA BHATT ICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • VEENA PANDE ICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • RAMCHARAN BHATTACHARYA ICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114289

Keywords:

B. juncea, CLAVATA3 gene, Cre recombinase, Cis-acting elements, Upstream Regulatory Modules

Abstract

Constitutive expression of the transgene is not always desirable because of its pleiotropic effects and metabolic pay-off. Therefore, tissue-specific expression of the transgene can be more significant in reducing the unintended effects of the transgene. The strength as well as tissue and temporal specificity of the promoter activity is dependent on cis-acting elements and transcriptional factors. The objective of this study was to analyse the promoter elements in Arabidopsis CLV3 promoter and its utilization in driving tissue specific expression of the cre recombinase gene in Indian mustard. The study was carried out at ICAR-NIPB, New Delhi, during 2015-19. In this study, in silico analysis of Upstream Regulatory Modules (URMs) of CLV3 gene led to the identification of several sequence motifs related to its meristematic tissue specific expression. Further, the CLV3 promoter was used for driving the expression of a cre recombinase gene in transgenic lines of B. juncea plants for functional analysis. The Cre-transgenic lines are useful for Cre/lox mediated marker gene excision in transgenic B. juncea.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aminedi R, Dhatwalia D, Jain V and Bhattacharya R. 2019. High efficiency in planta transformation of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) based on spraying of floral buds. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 138(2): 229–37.

Brand U, Fletcher J C, Hobe M, Meyerowitz E M and Simon R. 2000. Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science 289(5479): 617–9.

Brini F, Yamamoto A, Jlaiel L, Takeda S, Hobo T, Dinh H Q, Hattori T, Masmoudi K and Hanin M. 2011. Pleiotropic effects of the wheat dehydrin DHN-5 on stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 52(4): 676–88.

Chandna R, Augustine R and Bisht N C. 2012. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for gene expression normalization in Brassica juncea using real time quantitative RT-PCR. PloS one 7(5):e36918.

Cornejo M J, Luth D, Blankenship K M, Anderson O D and Blechl A E. 1993. Activity of a maize ubiquitin promoter in transgenic rice. Plant Molecular Biology 23(3): 567–81.

Doyle J. 1991. DNA protocols for plants. Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy, pp 283–93. Hewitt G M, Johnston A W B and Young J P W (Eds). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Fletcher J C, Brand U, Running M P, Simon R and Meyerowitz E M. 1999. Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283(5409): 1911–4.

Ito Y, Nakanomyo I, Motose H, Iwamoto K, Sawa S, Dohmae N and Fukuda H. 2006. Dodeca-CLE peptides as suppressors of plant stem cell differentiation. Science 313(5788): 842–5.

Kasuga M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K and Shinozaki K. 1999. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nature Biotechnology 17(3): 287–91.

Kondo T, Sawa S, Kinoshita A, Mizuno S, Kakimoto T, Fukuda H and Sakagami Y. 2006. A plant peptide encoded by CLV3 identified by in situ MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Science 313(5788): 845–8.

Liu H, Zhang H, Yang Y, Li G, Yang Y, Wang X, Basnayake B M, Li D and Song F. 2008. Functional analysis reveals pleiotropic effects of rice RING-H2 finger protein gene OsBIRF1 on regulation of growth and defense responses against abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant Molecular Biology 68(1-2): 17–30.

Livak K J and Schmittgen T D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402–8.

Martı́nez-Garcı́a J F, Huq E and Quail P H. 2000. Direct targeting of light signals to a promoter element-bound transcription factor. Science 288(5467): 859–63.

Park S H, Yi N, Kim Y S, Jeong M H, Bang S W, Choi Y D and Kim J K. 2010. Analysis of five novel putative constitutive gene promoters in transgenic rice plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 61(9):2459–67.

Schoof H, Lenhard M, Haecker A, Mayer K F, Jürgens G and Laux T. 2000.The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems is maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100(6): 635–44.

Spradling A , Drummond-Barbosa D and Kai T. 2001. Stem cells find their niche. Nature 414(6859): 98–104.

Steeves T A and Sussex I M. 1989. Patterns in Plant Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

Walters D and Heil M. 2007. Costs and trade-offs associated with induced resistance. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 71(1–3): 3–17.

Weigel D and Glazebrook J. 2006. Transformation of Agrobacterium using the freeze-thaw method. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 7(2006): 1031–6.

Weigel D and Jürgens G. 2002. Stem cells that make stems. Nature 415(6873): 751–54.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-24

Published

2021-08-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DHATWALIA, D., MAITHREYI, R. S., BHATT, D., PANDE, V., & BHATTACHARYA, R. (2021). Analysis of AtCLV3 promoter and its utilization for expressing cre recombinase in Indian mustard. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(6), 872–875. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114289
Citation