SWOT-Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) of Agriclinics and Agribusiness Center (ACABC) Scheme


632 / 287

Authors

  • SHAFI AFROZ Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Berhampore, West Bengal 742 101, India
  • RASHMI SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  • M S NAIN ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  • J R MISHRA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  • PRAMOD KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  • S A KHAN ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
  • M A IQUEBAL ICAR- Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114296

Keywords:

ACABC scheme, Agribusiness, SWOT-AHP Analysis

Abstract

Agriclinics and Agribusiness Center (ACABC) scheme was launched by the Government of India in 2003 as a strategy for boosting agribusiness in the country through agriculture graduates. Since its inception, a substantial number of agribusiness of different kinds started in the country, and hence expanded the agribusiness environment in the country, employed a vast population, and stretched extension services to the needy farmers even in remote villages. Therefore, it was essential to understand the panoramas of the scheme from its stakeholders. Hence the perception of the agripreneurs about the ACABC scheme was examined by measuring the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats quantitatively by combining SWOT with the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). A one-day interaction meet consisting of successful agripreneurs under the Nodal Training Institute (NTI)-Varanasi was held in Varanasi (UP), in October 2018 to administer the SWOT-AHP analysis. The results revealed that ACABC scheme had high positive (84.7%) features, and act as a suitable plan for promoting agribusinesses. The most significant positive features were the potentiality of employment generation under the scheme and the favourable attitude of self-employment among agriculture graduates. Delays in subsidy release under the scheme and less practical exposure of successful agribusiness to trainees under the scheme were the areas that need improvement which impedes the success of the scheme. The greater success of the scheme will enhance self-employment among agriculture graduates who will supplement the efforts of public extension by necessarily providing extension and other services to the farmers and, hence ACABC scheme can support the efforts of the Government for doubling the incomes of farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed T, Hasan S and Haneef R. 2011. Entrepreneurial characteristics of the agripreneurs under the scheme of agriclinics and agribusiness centers. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development 6(2): 145–49.

Bairwa S L, Kushwaha S and Sen C. 2015. Problems faced by agripreneurs in starting and operating agriventures under ACABCS scheme in Rajasthan state. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 5(2): 203–08.

Chahal V P and Ponnusamy K. 2014. Study on gender issues in promoting agri-entrepreneurship among farm graduates. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(6): 684–90.

Claire J G, Suresh B and Kwadwo AO. 2010. Review of agricultural extension in India-Are farmers’ information needs being met? IFPRI Discussion Paper 01048: 17.

Economic Survey. 2018. State of the economy: An analytical overview and outlook for policy, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India. Economic Survey I: 1–31.

George A and Bhaskaran S. 2004. Agriclinics: An Innovative Extension Approach. Proceedings (Abstracts) of 73rd National seminar on Alternative Extension Approaches in Technology Transfer conducted at Mitraniketan Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Vellanad, Trivandrum.

Karjagi R, Khan H S S and Vijaykumar H S. 2009. Problems of trained agripreneurs under the scheme of agriclinics and agribusiness centers in starting and running their agriventure: A study in South India. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 22(1): 233–34.

Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J and Kajanus M. 2000. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics 1(1): 41–52.

Mollenhorst H and de Boer I J M. 2004. Identifying sustainability issues using participatory SWOT analysis: a case study of egg production in the Netherlands. Outlook Agriculture 33: 267–76.

Nair K G K and Prasad P N. 2004. Offshore outsourcing: a SWOT analysis of a state in India. Information Systems Management 21(3): 34–40.

Nidhi R, Jolly M and Gadhe S. 2017. Study of agri-clinics & agri-business centers for improving women farmers’ access to extension services in agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research7(1): 205-214.

Parimaladevi S, Husain A S and Bhaskaran S. 2006. Determinants of the effectiveness of agriclinics and agribusiness centres scheme in Kerala. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 44(1-2): 91–93.

Press Information Bureau (PIB). 2019. 3rd Advance estimates of production of major crops for 2018-19, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India.

Rao M V and Rupkumar K. 2005. Concurrent Evaluation of Agriclinics and Agri-business centers scheme (AAG) in Maharashtra. A report submitted to National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management, pp 57–124.

Saaty T L and Vargas L G. 2001. Models, methodsc Concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science.

Saaty T L. 1977.A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3): 234–81.

Saaty T L. 2004. Decision making- The Analytic Hierarchy and Network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 13(1): 1–35.

Shekar S C, Bahal R and Lakshmi K B. 2014. Effectiveness of Agriclinics in promoting paid extension services among farmers. International Journal of Extension Education 10: 27–34.

Shekara P C, Malik H A and Jan N. 2011. Gender empowerment through agri-clinics and agri-business centers. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 2(1): 170–73.

Singh S C, Sendhil R and Singh R. 2017. Tracking the performance of Indian agriculture. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(12): 1619–26.

Singh R, Nain M S, Sharma J P and Mishra J R. 2016. Developing agripreneurship for sustainable farm income: Action research study on women fFarmers of Hapur district, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development 11(1): 127–35.

Stainback G A, Masozera M, Mukuralinda A and Dwivedi P. 2012. Smallholder agro-forestry in Rwanda: A SWOT-AHP Analysis. Small-scale Forestry 11: 285–300.

Swaminathan M S and Kesavan P C. 2018. Science for sustainable agriculture to achieve UN SDG Goal 2. Current Science 114(8): 1585–86.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-24

Published

2021-08-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

AFROZ, S., SINGH, R., NAIN, M. S., MISHRA, J. R., KUMAR, P., KHAN, S. A., & IQUEBAL, M. A. (2021). SWOT-Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) of Agriclinics and Agribusiness Center (ACABC) Scheme. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(6), 900–904. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114296
Citation