Effect of enriched compost and crop establishment methods on productivity and profitability of rice (Oryza sativa)


501 / 282

Authors

  • HIMANSU SEKHAR GOUDA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Y V SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • Y S SHIVAY ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • D R BISWAS ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • POORNIMA S ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • MANU S M ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114297

Keywords:

Aerobic rice, Enriched compost, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2018-19 at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi to study the effect of rice (Oryza sativa L.) establishment methods and enriched organic nutrient sources on growth and productivity of rice. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications having two main plot treatments, viz. aerobic rice (AR) and conventional transplanted (CT) rice and five sub plot treatments, viz. Control (No fertilizer), 100% RDF (100% mineral fertilization), 50% P through P enriched compost + 50% P through DAP, 50% N through N enriched compost + 50% N through urea and DAP and 100% organic (through N enriched compost and P enriched compost). Results showed that plant growth, productivity and profitability were significantly superior in CT rice than AR. Among the nutrient management options, 50% N through N enriched compost + 50% N through urea and DAP resulted in significantly higher grain yield (4.85 and 5.13 t/ha), gross (₹ 1.35 lakh and 1.43 lakh) and net return (₹ 85 lakh and 0.85 lakh) and yield attributes than other treatments and it was at par with 50% P through P enriched compost + 50% P through DAP in both the years. Hence, the conventional transplanting of rice along with integrated application of enriched compost and inorganic fertilizer may be recommended to farmers for getting higher productivity and profitability in rice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bremner J M and Mulvaney C S. 1982.Nitrogen–Total. (In) Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, pp 595–624. Page A L (ed), Madison, Wisconsin, Soil Science Society of America Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31

Choudhary R L, Kumar D, Shivay Y S, Lata Singh G and Singh N. 2010.Performance of rice (Oryza sativa) hybrids grown by the system of rice intensification with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(10): 917–20.

Choudhary R L, Kumar D, Shivay Y S, Anand A and Nain L. 2013. Yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa) hybrids grown by SRI method with and without plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(3): 430–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i3.4215

Gopinath K A, Saha S, Mina B L, Pande H, Kundu S and Gupta H S. 2008. Influence of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of wheat and on soil properties during transition to organic production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82: 51–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9168-0

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India (Pvt.) Ltd.

Pooniya V and Shivay Y S. 2012. Summer green-manuring crops and zinc fertilization on quality parameters of basmati rice. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 46(3): 382–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2014.981275

Singh R K. 2013. Response of basmati (Oryza sativa L.) rice varieties to system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional methods of rice cultivation. Annals of Agricultural Research 34(1): 50–56.

Shah F, Nie L, Cui K, Shah T, Wu W and Huang J. 2014. Rice grain yield and component responses to near 2°C of warming. Field Crops Research 157: 98–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.014

Suryavanshi P, Singh Y V, Prasanna R, Bhatia A and Shivay Y S. 2013. Pattern of methane emission and water productivity under different method of rice crop establishment. Paddy Water Environment 11(1): 321–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-012-0323-5

Suryavanshi P, Singh Y V, Singh K K and Shivay Y S. 2012. Relative efficiency of methods of crop establishment in rice. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(3): 76–79.

Yadav R L, Dwivedi B S and Pandey P S. 2000. Rice-wheat cropping system: assessment of sustainability under green manuring and chemical fertilizer inputs. Field Crops Research 65: 15–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00066-0

Singh Y, Singh B and Timsina J. 2005.Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Advances in Agronomy 85: 269–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(04)85006-5

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-24

Published

2021-08-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GOUDA, H. S., SINGH, Y. V., SHIVAY, Y. S., BISWAS, D. R., S, P., & M, M. S. (2021). Effect of enriched compost and crop establishment methods on productivity and profitability of rice (Oryza sativa). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(6), 905–909. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114297
Citation