A novel method for manual weeding in row crops

PREM K SUNDARAM; A RAHMAN; ANIL K SINGH; BIKAS SARKAR

doi:10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114307

Authors

PREM K SUNDARAM ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014, India
A RAHMAN ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014, India
ANIL K SINGH ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014, India
BIKAS SARKAR ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114307

Keywords:

Manual weeder, Farm women, Maize crop, Prototype

Abstract

For small and marginal farmers the affordable weeding option is either hand weeding or simple manual operated mechanical weeder in crop production for qualitative as well as quanlitative yield. Irrespective of weeding options the efficiency of weeding plays an importatnt role in overall performance of of the crop. This research paper presents a new prototype manual mechanical weeder designed and developed to take into account the anthropometric parameters of farm workers in Eastern region of India. Unlike other available manually operated mechanical weeders, this new weeder facilitates weeding in close proximity of plants and therefore improves overall wedding efficiency. The weeder was evaluated in maize crop and its weeding efficiency in maize crop was found to be 85% with operating field capacity 0.0120 ha/h. The design components of this weeder are simple and therefore can be manufactured locally at affordable and comparable with peers at cost of ₹1200-1400.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernacki H, Haman J and Kanafoski C Z.1985. Agricultural Machines, Theory and Construction. Central Institute for Scientific, Technical and Economic Information, Warsaw, Poland.

Gite L P, Majumder J, Mehta C R and Khadatkar A. 2009. Anthropometric and Strength Data of Indian Agricultural Workers for Farm Equipment Design. CIAE, Bhopal.

Korav S, Dhaka A K, Singh R, Premaradhya N and Reddy G C.2018. A study on crop weed competition in field crops. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(4): 3235–40.

Mehta M L, Verma S R, Mishra S R and Sharma V K.2005. Testing and Evaluation of Agricultural Machinery. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi.

Melander B, Rasmussen I A and Barberi P.2005. Integrating physical and cultural methods of weed control- examples from European research. Weed Science 53: 369–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-136R

Rangasamy K, Balasubramainian M and Swaminathan K R.1993. Evaluation of power weeder performance. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa Latin America 24(4): 16–8.

Riaz M, Malik M A, Mahmood Z T and Jamil M. 2006. Effect of various weed control methods on yield and yield components of wheat under different cropping patterns. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8(5): 636–40.

Sarkar B, Kumar R, Mishra J S and Bhatt B P. 2016.Comparative performance of different weeding tools in winter maize (Zea mays L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science 48(3): 330–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00083.6

Shekhar S, Chandra S and Roy D K.2010. Performance evaluation of different weeding tools in maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science 42(1&2): 95–7.