Minimal cost multifactor experiments for agricultural research involving hard-to-change factors
378 / 247
Keywords:
Exhaustive search, Hard-to-change factors, Minimum level changes, Minimal cost, Multifactor experiment, Run orders, TrendAbstract
Multifactor experiments are very common in agricultural research. Randomizing run orders in multifactor experiments often witness in large number of factorwise level changes which will increase the cost and time of the experiments. Minimal cost multifactor experiments are such experiments where the cost of the experiment is minimum which can be achieved by choosing a factorial run order where the total number of factor level change is minimum as cost of the experiment is directly proportional to the number of level changes of factors. Here, a method of constructing minimal cost 2-level multifactor experiments with minimum number of factorwise level changes has been proposed. As for a same factorial combination, there may exist more than one minimally changed factorial run order, an exhaustive search was also performed to obtain all possible minimally changed run order for two level multifactorial experiments with three factors. Due to restricted randomization, adaption of these run orders may witness the effect of systematic time trend. Hence, the usual method of analysis may not be a feasible solution due to lack of randomization. Here, the analytical procedure of experiments using minimal cost multifactorial run order has also been highlighted based on a real experimental data. The work has been carried out at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi during 2019-20. The data from the real experiment used for explaining the analysis procedure has been collected from Climate Change Facility of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute farm, New Delhi, India based on experiments conducted during 2014-15.
Downloads
References
Bhowmik A, Varghese E, Jaggi S and Varghese C. 2015. Factorial experiments with minimum changes in run sequences. Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 69(3): 243– 55.
Bhowmik A, Varghese E, Jaggi S and Varghese C. 2017. Minimally changed run sequences in factorial experiments. Communication in Statistics –Theory and Methods 46(15): 7444–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2016.1152490
Bhowmik A, Varghese E, Jaggi S and Varghese C. 2020. On the generation of factorial designs with minimum level changes. Communication in Statistics –Simulation and Computation. DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2020.1720244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2020.1720244
Correa A A, Grima P and Tort-Martorell X. 2009. Experimentation order with good properties for 2k factorial designs. Journal of Applied Statistics 36(7): 743–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760802499337
Correa A A, Grima P and Tort-Martorell X. 2012. Experimentation order in factorial designs: new findings. Journal of Applied Statistics 39(7): 1577–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2012.661706
De León G, Grima P and Tort-Martorell X. 2005. Experimentation order in factorial designs with 8 or 16 runs. Journal of Applied Statistics 32(3): 297–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760500054731
Dickinson A W. 1974. Some orders requiring a minimum number of factor level changes for 24 and 25 main effects plans. Technometrics 16(1): 31–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1974.10489146
Draper N and Stoneman D. 1968. Factor changes and linear trends in eight-run two-level factorial designs. Technometrics 10: 301–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1968.10490562
Hilow H. 2013. Comparison among run order algorithms for sequential factorial experiments. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 58: 397–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.09.013
Oprime P C, Pureza V M M and Oliveira S C D. 2017. Systematic sequencing of factorial experiments as an alternative to the random order. Gestão & Produção 24: 108–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1266-16
Pureza V M M, Oprime P C, Costa A F and Morales D. 2020. Bi-Objective mathematical model for optimal sequencing of two-level factorial designs. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics 34(4): 712–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/19-BJPS453
Varghese E, Bhowmik A, Jaggi S, Varghese C and Kaur C. 2017. On the generation of cost effective response surface designs. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 133: 37–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.020
Varghese E, Bhowmik A, Jaggi S, Varghese C and Lal S. 2019. On the construction of response surface designs with minimum level changes. Utilitas Mathematica 110: 293–303.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.