Implications of organized retailing in horticultural crops in Punjab


322 / 226

Authors

  • SUKHPAL SINGH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • M K SEKHON Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • SUNNY KUMAR Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • SUMIT BHARDWAJ Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i8.115801

Keywords:

Probit Model, Supermarkets, Traditional retailers

Abstract

The economic reforms to boost foreign direct investment in retail sector initiated in India had unfavorable consequences on the ongoing traditional system. The organized retail sector, known as super markets, is likely to make a threat on the vast traditional retail sector of India. Based on primary data collected during 2016-17 from supermarket stores, unorganized retailers and consumers of Punjab, the study revealed that volume of sales, employment and profit margin of the unorganized retailers of fruits and vegetables have decreased due to the commencement of super markets. To counter the adverse impacts of supermarkets on neighborhood fruits and vegetables markets, it is suggested that pro-active government interventions in encouraging retail cooperative system and developing sufficient infrastructure for unorganized sector would help fruits and vegetable retailers for enhancing their efficiency. It would indeed be depressing to know that traditional markets which till recently were thriving have been fading away. Hence the small retailers need to be encouraged and guided to modernize not only themselves but the entire market place as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birthal P S, Joshi P K and Gulati A. 2005. Vertical co-ordination in high value food commodities: implications for smallholders. Discussion Paper No. 85, Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute

Chand R. 2012. Development policies and agricultural markets. Economic and Political Weekly 47(52): 53–63.

Joseph M, Soundararajan N, Gupta M and Sahu S. 2008. Impact of organized retailing on the unorganized sector. Research Report, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi.

Mohan G, Sharma K and Maria Jos M. 2007. FDI in retail-III implication of Walmart’s backdoor entry. Research Report, Center for Policy Alternatives, February.

Narayanan S and Gulati A. 2002. Globalization and the small holders: a review of issues, approaches, and implications. MSSD Discussion Paper 50, International Food Policy Research Institute

Pritchard B, Gracy C P and Godwin M. 2010. The impacts of supermarket procurement on farming communities in India: evidence from rural Karnataka, Development Policy Review 28(4): 435–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00491.x

Ramaswami B, Birthal P S and Joshi P K. 2004. Measuring gains from contract farming: an empirical analysis of poultry in Andhra Pradesh, India. Draft report submitted to the International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA

Sekhon M K and Rangi P S. 2007. Marketing infrastructure for sustainable development-role of Punjab Mandi Board. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing 21(1): 110–21.

Singh S 2012. Role of FDI in multi-brand retail trade in India and its implication, Review of Market Integration 4(3): 283–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0974929213481711

Singh S P 2019. Impact of organized retail in changing perspective of unorganized retail sector in India. Amity Journal of Commerce and Financial Review 2(2): 57–73.

Sulaiman V R, Kalaivani, N J and Handoo J. 2010. Organised retailing of fresh fruits and vegetables: is it really helping producers? Working Paper: 2010-01, Hyderabad: Centre for Research on Innovation and Science Policy.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-09-22

Published

2021-09-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, S., SEKHON, M. K., KUMAR, S., & BHARDWAJ, S. (2021). Implications of organized retailing in horticultural crops in Punjab. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(8), 1151–1154. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i8.115801
Citation