Comparative biological characteristics of pea (Pisum sativum) varieties

Abstract views: 868 / PDF downloads: 58


  • VALENTIN KOSEV Institute of Forage Crops, 89 General Vladimir Vazov Str., 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
  • VILIANA VASILEVA Institute of Forage Crops, 89 General Vladimir Vazov Str., 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria


Correlation, Genetic diversity, Inheritance, Pea


Some basic quantitative signs and phenological indicators were analyzed for samples of seven forage peas (Pisum sativum L.) of different origins. Plant material from both, aboveground and root biomass was analyzed: i) in the beginning of flowering stage: plant height (cm), fresh stem weight (g), dry stem weight (g), root length (cm), fresh root mass weight (g), dry root mass weight (g), nodules per plant and nodule weight per plant (g); in the technological maturity of seeds stage: number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, seed weight per plant (g), number of seeds per pod and seed weight per pod (g). Broad sense heritability (Hbs) was calculated. Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied for the grouping of genotypes by similarity and correlation analysis for the finding the relationships between the signs and their variability. Specimens which meet the highest plant length requirements, green mass yield root length, number and weight of nodules were shown. They are considered as suitable for inclusion as parent components in future breeding programs. Some correlations were found, i.e. between the fresh stem weight and the nodules (r = +0.951), between the nodule number and the root length (r = +0.949) and between the weight and the number of seeds (r = +0.950). The findings could be of use for the breeding process in peas.


Download data is not yet available.


Amelin A V 1993. About change of elements of structure of a crop at grain cultivars of peas as a result of selection. Selection and Seed Production 2: 9–14.

Cruz C D. 2009. Programa Genes: Biometria. version 7.0. University of Federal Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil. Dimova D and Marinkov E. 1999. Experimental work and biometrics. HAI-Plovdiv 263 (in Bulgarian).

Dragavtsev V A and Averyanova A F. 1983. Mechanisms of genotype-environment interaction and homeostasis of quantitative plant characteristics: [Experiments with wheat]// Genetics 19(11): 1806–10.

Kuzmova K. 2002. Quantitative assessment of wintering and spring varieties of peas in terms of earliness. Jubilee Scientific Session-120 years of agricultural science in Sadovo, Bulgaria, pp 109–12.

Mahmud I and Kramer H. H. 1951. Segregation for yield high and maturity fallowing a soybean cross. Agricultural Journal 1: 505–09. DOI:

Novikova N E, Agarkova S N, Belyaeva R V, Golovina E V, Tsukanova Z R, Sulimova N N and Mitkina N I. 2012. The influence of introgression of mutated genes on the formation of productivity of pea varieties. Vestnik "Eagle" 3(36): 8–15.

Sayar M S and Anlarsal A E. 2008. A research on determination of yield and some yield components of forage pea (Pisum arvense L.) cultivars and lines in Diyarbakir ecological condotions. Journal of Science and Engineering of Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences of Cukurova University 19(4): 78-88.

Shchur A V, Vinogradov D V and Valckho V P. 2016. Effect of different levels agroecological loads on biochemical characteristics of soil. South of Russia: Ecology, Development 11(4): 139–48.

Shurhaeva K D and Fadeeva A N 2015. Variability of productivity elements of collection samples of peas. Leguminous and Cereal Crops 3(15): 71–76.

Solovov I I. 2006. ‘Study of the initial pea material (Pisum sativum L.) and its use in breeding for increasing symbiotic activity in the northern part of the Central Black Earth region of Russia’. Ph D thesis, Orel. 171 p.

Tiurin Yu S. 2014. Some methodical approaches breeding vetch. Multifunctional adaptive fodder production: Functions of fodder plants and ecosystems. Collection of Scientific Papers 3(51): 15–19.

Vinogradov D V, Коnkina V S and Kostin Y V. 2018. Developing the regional system of oil crops production management. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 10(7S): 289–302. DOI:

Ward Jr. Joe H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of American Statistical Association 58: 301. DOI:

Zelenov A A. 2017. ‘Morphophysiological features and selection value of the split-leafed form of pea’. Ph D thesis, Eagle.

Zelenov A N. 2011. Potential of the heterophilous form of pea and ways of its realization. Agrarian Russia 3: 13–16.









How to Cite

KOSEV, V., & VASILEVA, V. (2021). Comparative biological characteristics of pea (Pisum sativum) varieties. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(9), 1280–1284.