Resource use efficiency in cotton production in Palwal district of Haryana
Abstract views: 454 / PDF downloads: 191
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i9.116071
Keywords:
Cotton, Resource productivity, Resource use efficiencyAbstract
This paper examines productivity, profitability and resource use efficiency of cotton production in Palwal district of Haryana (India). The study is based on primary data collected from a total of 120 farmers selected randomly using two-stage sampling and data related to agricultural year 2017-18. Analytical tools like farm business analysis and production function approach is applied to summarise data. Results have revealed that large farms were more productive and earned higher profit from cotton production than small and medium farms. The regression results have shown that factors like human labour, phosphatic fertilizer, farm machinery and zinc had positive and significant impacts on cotton yield. The MVP of human labour, and phosphatic fertilizer were greater than unity indicating underutilization. However, other resources were applied in excess and suggested to utilize optimally to improve the yield of cotton.
Downloads
References
Agarwal I, Reddy A R, Singh Sukhpal and Yelekar S M. 2015. Yield gap and constraints analysis of cotton in India. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 29(2): 333–38.
Bhanumurthy K V B. 2002. Arguing a case for Cobb-Douglas production function. Review of Commerce Studies 20- 21(1):75–91.
Bravo-Ureta B E and L Rieger. 1991. Dairy farm efficiency measurement using stochastic frontier and neo-classic duality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 421–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1242726
Chatterjee S, Bandopadhyay P and Sahu P K. 2012. Input use and technological change in cotton cultivation in different states of India. Journal of Crop and Weed 8(1): 95–97.
Gohil G R, Raviya P B, Parkhiya A M and Kalsariya B N. 2016. Constraints faced by cotton growers in crisis management of cotton cultivation in Gujarat. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(25): 1500–02.
Gopalkrishnan N S, Manickam and Prakash A H. 2007. Problems and prospects of cotton in different zones of India. Central Institute of Cotton Research, Coimbatore.
Goud E R, Ram D and Chowdary K R. 2018. Constraints perceived by the cotton growers on the cotton cultivation in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(6): 872–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.102
James C. 2002. Global review of commercialized transgenic crops: 2001 feature: Bt cotton. ISAAA Briefs No. 26, ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Karthick, V, Alagumani T and Amathnath J S. 2013. Resource-use efficiency and technical efficiency of turmeric production in Tamil Nadu- A stochastic frontier approach. Agricultural Economics Research Review 26(1): 109–14.
Kiresur V R and Ichangi Manjunath. 2011. Socioeconomic impact of bt cotton- A case study of Karnataka. Agricultural Economics Research Review 24(1): 67-81.
Kumar S, Anwer M E, Kumar Sumant, Singh H P, Mishra S N, Sarkar S K, and Immaneuraj T K. 2020. Agricultural wages in India: Trends and determinants. Agricultural Economics Research Review 33(1): 71–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2020.00008.7
Kurbis G. 2000. An economic analysis of tilapia production by small scale farmers in rural Honduras. M Sc thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management. University of Manitoba. Winnipeg, Manitoba. http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/obj/ s4/f2/dsk1/tape3/PQDD_0027/MQ51735.pdf. pp: 102
Manjunath K, Swamy P S, Dhananjaya J B R and Nadoni N N. 2013. Resource use efficiency of bt cotton and non-bt cotton in Haveri district of Karnataka. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology 4(3): 253–58.
Miller E. 2008. An assessment of CES and Cobb-Douglas production functions. Congressional Budget Office. https:// www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/110th-congress-2007-2008/ working paper/2008-05_0.pdf.
MoSPI. 2019. State-wise and item-wise estimates of value of output from agriculture and allied sectors (2011-12 to 2015-16). Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, New Delhi.
Pattanayak B. 2016. Maharashtra continues to fight with low cotton yield. Financial Express, August 12.
Qaim M and Zilberman D. 2003. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299: 900–02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080609
Shelke R D, Katkade J L and Jadhav V B. 2016. Resource productivity and resource use efficiency in bt cotton production in Beed district. Agriculture Update 11(2): 129–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/AU/11.2/129-132
Shrey R and Kamble S H. 2014. Resource productivity and resource use efficiency on cotton farms in Parbhani district of Marathwada region. International Journal of Commerce and Business Management 7(1): 50–53.
Smith I R. 1982. Micro-economics of existing aquaculture production systems: basic concepts and definitions. In: Aquaculture Economics Research in Asia. Proceedings of a workshop held in Singapore, June 2–5, 1981. Ottawa, Canada.
International Development Research Centre [ICLARM, Manila, Philippines], http://pubs.iclarm.net/resource_centre/WF_2009.pdf)
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.