Successful rearing of Bactrocera dorsalis on a semi-solid artificial diet


Abstract views: 172 / PDF downloads: 51

Authors

  • SIMRANPREET KAUR Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • SANDEEP SINGH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • PRASHANT MOHANPURIA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • ZHIHONG LI China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i9.116083

Keywords:

Biological attributes, Diet development, Pest management, Rearing in laboratory, RNA interference

Abstract

The fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is an economically important polyphagous pest and has been adjudged as one of the five most devastating fruit flies throughout the world. These flies are highly polyphagous, multivoltine, fertile, and mobile which makes it very difficult to manage these insect-pests. Finding a simple, cheap, and appropriate rearing approach of B. dorsalis is an urgent need to support research activities for management of this pest. This investigation is meant to evaluate various artificial diets and to find out the most suitable artificial diet for mass rearing of this pest. In the present studies, five different artificial diets were used for the rearing of B. dorsalis at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during 2018–19. A semi-solid artificial diet consisting of 1000 ml water, 40 g dry yeast, 120 g sucrose, 1 g sorbic acid, 6.6 g ascorbic acid, 10 g agar, 10 g soya peptone, 0.1 g ampicillin, and 0.03 g tetracycline was considered most suitable for successful rearing of B. dorsalis. The biological parameters of B. dorsalis were used to validate the diet quality and rearing procedure. This diet supported the development of B. dorsalis efficiently and was used further for evaluation of RNA interference (RNAi) studies. This artificial diet and suggested rearing procedure will help to maintain culture of B. dorsalis and further help to study biology and management of other insect-pests species as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheema H S and Singh B. 1990. A User Manual to CPCS1. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Claderaj L, Vilardi J C, Juri M, Paulin L E, Giardini M C, Gómez Cendra P V, Segura D F and Lanzavecchia S B. 2014.

Genetics and biology of Anastrepha fraterculus: research supporting the use of the sterile insect technique (SIT) to control this pest in Argentina. BMC Genetics 15: 1–14.

Hou Q L, Chen E H, Dou W and Wang J J. 2020. Assessment of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) diets on adult fecundity and larval development: Insights into employing the sterile insect technique. Journal of Insect Science 20: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iez128.

Kamala Jayanthi P D and Verghese A. 2002. A simple and cost-effective mass rearing technique for the tephritid fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Current Science 82: 266–68.

Kamala Jayanthi P D, Verghese A and Sreekanth P D. 2011. Predicting the Oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) trap catch using artificial neural networks: A case study. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 31: 205–11.

Moadeli T, Mainali B, Ponton F and Taylor P W. 2018. Evaluation of yeasts in gel larval diet for Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni. Journal of Applied Entomology 142:679-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12520

Mohanpuria P, Govindaswamy M, Sidhu G, Singh S, Kaur S and Chhuneja P. 2021. Ingestion of bacteria expressing dsRNA to maggots produces severe mortality and deformities in fruit fly [Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)] (Diptera: Tephritidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 31: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00345-7

Narayanan E S and Batra H N. 1960. Fruit Flies and Their Control. ICAR, New Delhi, India.

Nestel D, Papadopoulos N T, Pascacio-Villafán C, Righini N, Altúzar-Molina A R and Aluja M. 2016. Resource allocation and compensation during development in holometabolous insects. Journal of Insect Physiology 95: 78–88.

Ole-MoiYoi OK and Lux S A. 2004. Fruit flies in sub-Saharan Africa: A long-neglected problem devastating local fruit production and a threat to horticulture beyond Africa. (In) Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance. Ultra Litho, Johannesburg, South Africa, pp 5-10.

Parker A G. 2005. Mass-rearing for sterile insect release. Sterile Insect Technique, Principle and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management, pp. 209-32. Dyck V A, Hendrichs J and Robinson A S (Eds). International Atomic Energy Agency, Springer, Netherlands.

Piper M D W and Partridge L. 2007. Dietary restriction in Drosophila: delayed aging or experimental artifact? PLoS Genetics 3: e57.

Rohlfs M and Hoffmeister T S. 2005. Maternal effects increase survival probability in Drosophila subobscura larvae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 117: 51–58.

Sharma D R, Aulakh P S and Singh S. 2011. Management of Fruit Flies in Fruit Crops. Department of Fruit Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Singh S. 2020. Integrated pest management of fruit flies, Bactrocera spp. in rainy season guava in Indian Punjab. Agricultural Research Journal 57(4): 541–47.

Singh S and Kaur G. 2016. Status of fruit flies on fruit crops in Punjab and their integrated management. Tephritid Seminar 2016-Understanding Tephritids in Toto: Taxonomy, Ecology, Quarantine & Management, pp 51–52.

Kamala Jayanthi P D, Chakravarthy A K, Raghava T and Kempraj V (Eds). Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India.

Singh S and Sharma D R. 2013a. Biology and morphometry of Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera zonata on different fruit crops. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83: 1423–25.

Singh S and Sharma D R. 2013b. Management of fruit flies in rainy season guava through male annihilation technique using methyl eugenol based traps. Indian Journal of Horticulture 70: 512–18.

Wang P, Lu P, Zheng X, Chen L, Lei C and Wang X. 2013. New artificial diet for continuous rearing of the bean pod borer, Maruca vitrata. Journal of Insect Science 13: 121.

Wang Y, Zhang S, Ren B and Su J. 2014. Effects of dietary additives in artificial diets on survival and larval development of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Florida Entomologist 97: 1041–48.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-09-27

Published

2021-09-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KAUR, S., SINGH, S., MOHANPURIA, P., & LI, Z. (2021). Successful rearing of Bactrocera dorsalis on a semi-solid artificial diet. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(9), 1342–1346. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i9.116083
Citation