Energetics and profitability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)-based cropping systems as influenced with conservation agricultural practices

Abstract views: 164 / PDF downloads: 95


  • N K JAIN HRM Unit, ICAR, KAB-II, New Delhi
  • R A JAT ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation Research Centre, Kota
  • R S YADAV ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
  • H N MEENA ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
  • K PRAJAPAT ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana



Energetics, Green manuring, Profitability, System productivity, Zero-tillage


Increasing energy use efficiency and reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from agriculture are major
challenges to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs). An experiment, comprising 14 treatments, viz. sole peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), peanut-fallow-sesbania, peanut-fallow-green gram (GG), peanut-conventional tilled wheat (CTW), peanut-CTW-sesbania, peanut-CTW-GG, peanut-CTW-wheat straw incorporation (WSI), peanut-zero tilled wheat (ZTW), peanut-ZTW-sesbania, peanut-ZTW-GG, peanut-ZTW-WSI, peanut+pigeonpea, peanut+pigeonpeasesbania and peanut+pigeonpea-GG was laid out in randomized block design with three replications for five consecutive years (2011–12 to 2015–16) at Junagadh, Gujarat, at fixed site to study the influence of conservation agricultural practices on energetics and profitability of peanut-based cropping systems. Green manuring with sesbania significantly improved the pod yield of peanut (12.8%) and seed yield of pigeonpea (8.9%). Zero tillage (ZT) improved wheat yield by 4.8% over Conventional tillage (CT). The energy requirement of peanut+pigeonpea intercropping was 16.7% lower than peanut–wheat cropping system irrespective of GM and WSI. Peanut–ZT wheat with sesbania green manure recorded highest energy output (251.2 × 103 MJ/ha) and net energy (201.0 × 103 MJ/ha). This cropping system also fetched the highest system productivity (4551 kg/ha), and system profitability (` 125.7 × 103/ha) followed by peanut–ZT wheat (INR 120.6/ha × 103/ha). Therefore, peanut–ZT wheat–green manuring (sesbania/greengram) cropping system was found as productive, economical and energy efficient which might be promoted to intensify the sole peanut cropping in Saurashtra region of Gujarat.


Download data is not yet available.


Anonymous. 2015. Vision 2050. Directorate of Groundnut Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Junagadh, Gujarat, India.

Ashoka P, Meena R S, Kumar S, Yadav G S and Layek J. 2017. Green nanotechnology is a key for eco-friendly agriculture. Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 4440–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.117

Chaudhary V P, Gangwar B and Pandey D K. 2006. Auditing of energy use and output of different cropping systems in India. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-Journal VIII, pp. 1–13.

Choudhary M, Rana K S, Bana R S, Ghasal P C, Choudhary G L, Jakhar P and Verma R K. 2017. Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of pearl millet–mustard cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture in rainfed semi-arid agro-ecosystem. Energy 141: 1052–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.136

Das A, Basavaraj S, Layek J, Idapuganti, R G, Lal R, Rangappa K, Yadav G S, Babu S, Ghosh P K and Ngachan S. 2020. Can conservation tillage and residue management enhance energy use efficiency and sustainability of rice-pea system in the Eastern Himalayas? Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 66(6): 830–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1639157

Dixit A K, Agrawal R K, Das S K, Sahay C S, Choudhary M, Rai A K, Kumar S, Kantwa S R and Palsaniya D R. 2019. Soil properties, crop productivity and energetics under different tillage practices in fodder sorghum + cowpea – wheat cropping system. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65(4): 492–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1507024

IARI. 2012. Crop residues management with conservation agriculture: Potential, constraints and policy needs. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Jain N K, Jat R S, Meena H N and Chakraborty K. 2018. Productivity, nutrient and soil enzymes influenced with conservation agriculture practices in peanut. Agronomy Journal 110(2): 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.08.0467

Jat H S, Kumar P, Sutaliya J M, Kumar S, Choudhary M, Singh Y and Jat M L. 2019. Conservation agriculture based sustainable intensification of basmati rice-wheat system in North-West India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65(10): 1370–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1566708

Khosruzzaman S, Asgar M A, Karim N and Akbar S. 2010. Energy intensity and productivity in relation to agriculture- Bangladesh perspective. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences 34(1): 59–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v34i1.5492

Mittal V K, Mittal J P and Dhawan K C. 1985. Research digest on energy requirements in agricultural sector (1971-82). In: Bulletin I. All India coordinated research project on energy requirements in agriculture (ICAR). Ludhiana; Punjab Agricultural University, p 250.

Parihar C M, Jat S L, Singh A K, Majumdar K, Jat M L, Saharawat Y S, Pradhan S and Kuri B R. 2017. Bio-energy, water-use efficiency and economics of maize-wheat-mungbean system under precision-conservation agriculture in semi-arid agro-ecosystem. Energy 119: 245–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.068

Pooniya V and Shivay Y S. 2011. Effect of green manuring and zinc fertilization on productivity and nutrient uptake in basmati rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 56(1): 28–34.

Prashanth K M. 2013. 'Nutrient management as influenced by tillage and crop residues in maize (Zea mays L.)'. M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichuru, India.

Singh K P, Prakash V, Srinivas K and Srivastava A K. 2008. Effect of tillage management on energy-use efficiency and economics of soybean (Glycine max) based cropping systems under the rainfed conditions in North-West Himalayan Region. Soil Tillage and Research 100: 78–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.04.011

Singh R J and Ahlawat I P S. 2015. Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of transgenic cotton-wheat production system through peanut intercropping and FYM addition. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4516-4

Singh V K, Dwivedi B S, Singh S K, Majumdar K, Jat M L, Mishra R P and Rani M. 2016. Soil physical properties: yield trends and economics after five years of conservation agriculture based rice-maize system in north-western India. Soil Tillage and Research 155: 133–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.08.001

Tuti M D, Prakash V, Pandey B M, Bhattacharyya R, Mahanta D, Bisht J K Kumar M, Mina B L, Kumar N, Bhatt J C and Srivastava A K. 2012. Energy budgeting of colocasia-based cropping systems in the Indian sub-Himalayas. Energy 45: 986–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.056

Yadav M P, Rai J, Kushwaha S P and Singh G K. 2005. Production potential and economic analysis of various cropping systems for Central Plains Zone of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(2): 83–5.









How to Cite

JAIN, N. K., JAT, R. A., YADAV, R. S., MEENA, H. N., & PRAJAPAT, K. (2022). Energetics and profitability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)-based cropping systems as influenced with conservation agricultural practices. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(12), 1812–1817. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i12.120813