Evaluation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) genotypes for plant growth, fruit yield and quality


Abstract views: 249 / PDF downloads: 120

Authors

  • F A KHAN Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India
  • HILAL A BHAT Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India
  • S A BHAT Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India
  • S NARAYAN
  • S A MIR Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India
  • KHALID Z MASOODI Evaluation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) genotypes for plant growth, fruit yield and quality
  • A A MALIK Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India
  • S A LONE Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India
  • SEHRISH SAJAD Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India
  • URFIA JAN Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir 190 025, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i4.123978

Keywords:

Fruit yield, Leaf area, Mineral content, Tomato, Vitamin C

Abstract

The study was carried out with different tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes during 2018 and 2019 at Division of Basic Sciences and Humanities (SKUAST-K), Shalimar, Srinagar (J&K) to assess the plant and fruit growth with quality characters and mineral composition. Healthy and uniform seedlings of twelve tomato genotypes were transplanted in pots with four replications. Among different genotypes, 2016/TODVAR-9 (G8) recorded the highest leaf area (713.6 cm2) and fruit yield (1.77 kg/plant) that also showed maximum values TSS (4.35%), titrable acidity (1.32%), vitamin C (36.18 mg/100g), lycopene (6.84 mg/100g) and carotenoid (8.28 mg/100g) contents coupled with maximum P (0.83%), K (2.35%), Mg (0.52%) and Ca (0.23%) contents. Regression analysis of the data showed a strong correlation between leaf area and fruit yield (r = 0.86**), leaf area and fruit sugar content (r = 0.60*), PLW and
fruit Ca content (r = -0.97**), fruit Ca content and storage life (r = 0.97**) and fruit PLW and storage life (r = -0.98**)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chandra H M, Shanmugaraj B M, Srinivasan B and Ramalingam S. 2020. Influence of genotypic variations on antioxidant properties in different fractions of Tomato. Journal of Food Science. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232736173.

FAOSTAT. 2017. Production – Crops – Area harvested/ Production quantity – Tomatoes –2014, FAO Statistics online database, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, Edn 2nd, pp. 680. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Gosavi P U, Kamble A B and Pandure B S. 2010. Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on quality of tomato fruits. Asian Journal of Horticulture 5(2): 376–78.

Hasan S A, Hayat S, Wani A S and Ahmad A. 2011. Establishment of sensitive and resistant variety of tomato on the basis of photosynthesis and antioxidative enzymes in the presence of cobalt applied as shotgun approach. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 23 (3): 175–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202011000300001

Jo W J and Shin J H. 2020. Effect of leaf area management on tomato plant growth in greenhouses. Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnology 61: 981–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-020-00283-1

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice- Hall.

Khandaker M M, Sharif Hossain A B M, Sani, W., Saifuddin M. and Alenazi, M. 2009.Effect of harvesting and storage conditions on the postharvest quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Australian Journal of Crop Science 3(2):113–21.

Leiva-Brondo M, Valcarcel M, Marti R, Rosello S and Cebolla- Cornejo, J. 2016. New opportunities for developing tomato varieties with enhanced carotenoid content. Scientia Agricola 73(6): 512–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0427

Lakra A, Trivedi J and Mishra S. 2018. Studies on biochemical composition of various tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 7(12): 977–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.121

Manna M and Paul A. 2012. Studies on genetic variability and characters association of fruit quality parameters in tomato. HortFlora Research Spectrum 1(2): 110–16.

Marles R J. 2016. Mineral nutrient composition of vegetables, fruits and grains. Journal of Food Composition Analysis 56: 193–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2016.11.012

Martí R, Rosello S and Cebolla-Cornejo J. 2016. Tomato as a source of carotenoids and polyphenols targeted to cancer prevention. Cancers 8. doi:10.3390/cancers8060058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8060058

Mehta N and Asati B S. 2008. Genetic relationship of growth and development traits with fruit yield in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 21(1): 92–96.

Oniya V N, Chukwudi U P, Ogwudu V C, Atugwu A I, Eze S C, Ene C O and Umeh S. 2019. Evaluation of tomato genotype growth, yield, and shelf life enhancement in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 21:143–52.

Ranganna S. 1986. Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruits and Vegetable Products, pp. 192–97. Tata McGraw Hill Pub. Co. Ltd., New Delhi, India.

Revanasiddappa K V. 2008. Breeding investigations involving biparental mating and selection approaches in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.). MSc (Agri.) Thesis, submitted to University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (India).

Smith M R, Rao I M and Merchant A. 2018. Source-sink relationship in crop plants and their influence on yield development and nutritional quality. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01889

Tiwari J K and Upadhyay D. 2011. Correlation and path-coefficient studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Research Journal of Agriculture Science 2(1): 63–68.

Downloads

Submitted

2022-05-17

Published

2022-05-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KHAN, F. A. ., BHAT, H. A. ., BHAT, S. A. ., NARAYAN, S. ., MIR, S. A. ., Z MASOODI, K. ., MALIK, A. A. ., LONE, S. A. ., SAJAD, S. ., & JAN, U. . (2022). Evaluation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) genotypes for plant growth, fruit yield and quality. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 92(4), 495-499. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i4.123978
Citation