Bioefficacy, phytotoxicity and insecticide residue dynamics of chlorantraniliprole in brinjal (Solanum melongena) under field condition
541 / 689
Keywords:
Bioefficacy, Chlorantraniliprole, Dose optimization, Phytotoxicity, Residue dissipationAbstract
Brinjal shoot and fruit borer (BSFB) (Leucinodes orbonalis (Gennadius)) causes significant economic harm to brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) production. The present study was carried out at research farm of ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh to standardize the optimum dose of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% sc (CAP) to manage BSFB under field conditions and to quantify the residue of CAP in brinjal for food safety. Three CAP doses (20, 40, and 80 g a.i./ha) along with an old generic insecticide (cypermethrin 25% ec @50 g a.i./ ha) as a check and an untreated control were examined during 2017–19. CAP applications of 40 and 80 g a.i./ha were similarly efficient against BSFB and resulted in a significantly higher yield of brinjal fruit. The population of borers was reduced significantly in the treatment, CAP @40 g a.i./ha as compared to the untreated control. Phytotoxic effects of chlorantraniliprole 18.5% sc were not observed. Natural enemies of the brinjal ecosystem, viz. predatory pentatomid bug [Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff)], ladybird beetle [Coccinella septempunctata (Linn.)], and spider were unaffected by CAP treatment. When CAP was applied @40 and 80 g a.i./ha, chlorantraniliprole degraded from brinjal fruits with half-lives of 4.85 and 7 days, and pre-harvest intervals of 7 and 10 days were prescribed, respectively. Even at greater application doses, residues in a person's meals were found to be lower than the maximum permissible intake (24.96 mg/person/day) in day-zero samples. Chlorantraniliprole @40 g a.i./ha can be an effective alternative to the conventional insecticides against BSFB in brinjal, ensuring quality, sustainability, and safety.
Downloads
References
Boller E F, Vogt H, Ternes P and Malavolta C. 2005. Working document on selectivity of pesticides. IOBC/wprs: 1–9. Accessed on 21.9.2016. http://www.iobcwprs.org/ip_ipm/03021_IOBC_ WorkingDocumentPesticides_Explanations.pdf.
Halder J, Kushwaha D and Rai A B. 2020. Biology and feeding potential of Eocanthecona furcellata (Wolff) on its lesser known prey, Spilosoma obliqua (Walker). Journal of Biological Control 34(2): 109–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2020/24829
Halder J, Kushwaha D, Rai A B, Singh A and Singh B. 2017. Potential of entomopathogens and neem oil against two emerging insect pests of vegetables. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(2): 220–24.
Hingmire S, Oulkar D P, Utture S C, Shabeer T A and Banerjee K. 2015. Residue analysis of fipronil and difenoconazole in okra by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and their food safety evaluation. Food Chemistry 176: 145–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.049
Hoskin M L. 1961. Mathematical treatment of loss of pesticide residues. Plant Protection Bulletin 9: 163–69.
CIBRC. 2018. http://cibrc.nic.in/mup.htm. Accessed on 01.6.2018. Kodandaram M H, Rai A B and Halder J. 2010.
Novel insecticides for management of insect pests in vegetable crops: a review. Vegetable Science 37(2): 109–23.
Kodandaram M H, Rai A B, Sharma S K and Singh B 2017. Shift in the level of susceptibility and relative resistance of Leucinodes orbonalis to diamide insecticides. Phytoparasitica 45(2): 151–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-017-0584-z
NSS Report No.541 (66/1.0/3) (2012) Household Consumption of Various Goods and Services in India. NSS 66th Round. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. Accessed on 01.08.2020
Rajavel D S, Mohanraj A and Bharathi K. 2011. Efficacy of chlorantraniliprole against brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 17(1): 28–31.
Sahu M, Adak T, Patil N B, Pandi G G P, Gowda G B, Yadav M K, Annamalai M, Golive P and Jena M. 2019. Dissipation of chlorantraniliprole in contrasting soils and its effect on soil microbes and enzymes. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 180: 288–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.024
SANTE. 2017. Guideline document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticide residue analysis in food and feed, SANTE document no. SANTE/11813/2017. Accessed on 01.08.2020
SAS Institute, 2011. SAS version 9. 3 System Options: Reference, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
Vijayasree V, Bai H, Beevi S N, Mathew T B, George T and Xavier G. 2015. Persistence and effect of processing on reduction of chlorantraniliprole residues on brinjal and okra fruits. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187(5): 299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4530-6
Vijayasree V, Bai H, Beevi S N, Mathew T B, Kumar V, George T and Xavier G. 2013. Persistence and effects of processing on reduction of chlorantraniliprole residues on cowpea fruits. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 90(4): 494–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0944-9
Zhang X, Xu Q, Lu W and Liu F. 2015. Sublethal effects of four synthetic insecticides on the generalist predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis. Journal of Pesticides Science 88: 383–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0606-2
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.