Stratification and SSR markers integration for promoting low chill peach (Prunus persica) hybridization in foot hills of Himalayas
273 / 257
Keywords:
Hybridity confirmation, Prunus persica, Summer stratification, SSR markerAbstract
The present study was carried out at horticulture research centre, Patharchatta of G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand and Uttarakhand Council for Biotechnology, Haldi, Uttarakhand, during 2021 and 2022 with an objective to facilitate hybridization in low chill peaches [Prunus persica (L.) Stokes]. Selected cultivars of low chill peaches were crossbred using Saharanpur Prabhat, Sharbati Late and Sharbati Surkha as female parents, and Florda Red, Pratap and Early Grand as male. Among the hybrids, H2 (Saharanpur Pabhat × Pratap) showed the maximum fruit set (76.74%), while H5 (Sharbati Surkha × Pratap) had the minimum (55.93%). The highest fruit retention (71.15%) was noticed in H4 (Sharbati Late × Florda Red), and it was lowest in H2 (39.85%). H4 had the longest fruit development period (98.75 days), whereas H2 had the shortest (75.75 days). The seeds of hybrid
H5 took the maximum days for stratification (58.75 days), while it was lowest in H2 (48.25 days). The germination percentage was estimated highest in H4 (83.88%) and lowest in H2 (65.99%). Out of 25 SSR markers tested for hybridity confirmation, only 3 (CPPCT-022, UDP96-005 and UDP98-407) were discovered to be capable of testing the hybridity of F1 seedlings. Results from this study will be helpful in improving the recovery of low chill peach hybrids and ensuring the hybridity of seedlings at a very early stage.
Downloads
References
Alves G, Gelain J, Vidal G S, Nesi C N, Mio L L M D and Biasi L A. 2018. Flowering period and fruit quality of peach trees selections and cultivars in the metropolitan region of Curitiba. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 40(3): 132–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452018991
Aranzana M J, Garcia-Mas J, Carbo J and Arus P. 2002. Development and variability analysis of microsatellite markers in peach. Plant Breeding 121: 87–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00656.x
Bruckner C H, Osmar da J, Silva C, Cruz C D, Wagner J V and Moreno Sanchez M A. 2012. Effect of the embryo genotype on the chilling requirement for overcoming peach seed dormancy. Acta Horticulturae 13: 145–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.962.28
Chaurasiya P C and Mishra R K. 2017. Varietal performance of peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] under northern hill zone of Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5(5): 37–40.
Cipriani G, Lot G, Huang W G, Marrazzo M T, Peterlunger E and Testolin R. 1999. AC/GT and AG/CT microsatellite repeats in peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch]: isolation, characterization and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 65–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051209
Devi I, Singh H and Thakur A. 2018. Morphological characterization and hybridity confirmation of low chill peach. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88: 889–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i6.80637
Dirlewanger E, Crosson A, Tavaud P, Aranzana M J, Poizat C, Zanetto A, Arus P and Laigret L. 2002. Development of microsatellite markers in peach and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 127–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0867-7
Doyle J J and Doyle J L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
Eroglu Z O, Misirli A and Kuden A B. 2016. The cross-breeding performances of some peach varieties. YuzuncuYil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26: 89–97.
Faust M and Timon B. 1995. Origin and dissemination of peach. Horticultural Reviews 17: 267–379.
Goswami M. 2020. ‘Characterization and crossing among different cultivars of low chill peaches (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)’. MSc Thesis, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh.
IBM Corp. 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp., USA. Kumar K, Khokhar A and Singh D. 2013. Peach. Fruit Production In India, 1st edn, pp. 457–58. Dhillon W S (Ed). Narendra Publishing House, Delhi, India.
Liu W, Chen X, Liu G, Liang Q, He T and Feng J. 2007. Interspecific hybridization of Prunus persica with Prunus armeniaca and Prunus salicina using embryo rescue. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 88: 289–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9201-z
Monet R and Bassi D. 2008. Classical genetics and breeding. The Peach Botany, Production and Uses, 1st edn, pp. 61–84. Layne D R and Bassi D (Eds). CAB International, Wallingford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845933869.0061
Nava G A, Dalmago G A, Bergamaschi H, Paniz R, Santos R P and Marodin G A B. 2009. Effect of high temperatures in the pre-blooming and blooming periods on ovule formation, pollen grains and yield of ‘Granada’ peach. Scientia Horticulturae 22: 37–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.03.021
Pandey S, Thakur A, Singh H and Vikal Y. 2019. Intraspecific hybridization of low chill peach cultivars for superior fruit quality and their hybridity confirmation by SSR markers. Indian Journal of Horticulture 76(2): 199–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2019.00031.8
Sharma S K and Verma K S. 2014. Adaptation potential of low chill peach varieties to inter- annual climatic variability in the lower Shivalik Himalayas. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology 7(1): 157–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2230-732X.7.1.021
Singh H, Thakur A and Jawandha S K. 2017. Summer stratification and germination: A viable option for recovery of hybrid seedlings in low chill peach and nectarines. Indian Journal of Horticulture 74(2): 151–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2017.00034.2
Sosinski B, Gannavarapu M, Hager L D, Beck L E, King GJ, Ryder C D, Rajapakse S, Baird W V, Ballard R E and Abbott A G. 2000. Characterization of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 421–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051499
Srivastava K K, Barman P and Kumar D. 2021. Effect of direct sowing and stratification on germination and growth of peach under sub-tropical climate of Uttar Pradesh. Agricultural Science Digest 41(3): 507–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-5292
Trifonova A A, Boris K V, Mesyats N V, Tsiupka V A, Smykov A V and Mitrofanova I V. 2021. Genetic diversity of peach cultivars from the collection of the Nikita Botanical Garden based on SSR markers. Plants 10(12): 2609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122609
Tusa N, Abbate L, Ferrante S, Lucretti S and Scarano M T. 2002. Identification of zygotic and nucellar seedlings in citrus interploid crosses by means of isozymes, flow cytometry and ISSR-PCR. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters 7: 703–08.
Yamamoto T, Mochida K, Imai T, Shi Y Z and Ogiwara I. 2002. Microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] derived from an enriched genomic and cDNA libraries. Molecular Ecology Notes 23: 298–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00242.x
Wang Y L. 1985. Peach growing and germplasm in China. Acta Horticulturae 173: 51–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1985.173.6
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.