Performance evaluation of an electronically controlled tractor-operated applicator for liquid urea application


Abstract views: 110 / PDF downloads: 153

Authors

  • PARVEEN DHANGER Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • ROHINISH KHURANA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • ANOOP KUMAR DIXIT Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • MANJEET SINGH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • AMRIT KAUR MAHAL Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i2.132319

Keywords:

Applicator, Electronic metering, Liquid urea, Mulch field

Abstract

Currently, granular urea (most commonly used fertilizer) is applied through broadcasting by farmers in the field. Granular urea causes significant losses due to slower soil mineralization rates, as well as ammonia volatilization and immobilization. Hence, fertilizing crops is becoming an increasingly difficult task due to low use efficiency and in mulch field conditions, it becomes more severe. The research done on mechatronic systems of applying liquid fertilizer by spot injection in field is limited. In the present study, the performance of the developed tractor operated liquid urea applicator consisting of electronic metering mechanism was evaluated at the Research Farm of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab during 2020–22. Research was done at two different types of soil (S1: sandy loam, and S2: loam) for three different forward speeds (3.6, 2.7, 1.8 km/h). Results obtained from experiments indicated that both soil type and forward speed had a significant (P<0.05) effect on the application rate of liquid urea. The best results were obtained without affecting crop yield at a forward speed of the machine 2.7 km/h with the application rate of 1090.85 litre/ha and 1035.18 litre/ha, fuel consumption 4.13 litre/h and 4.02 litre/h and crop yield 39.50 q/ha and 39.63 q/ha, for soil type S1 and S2 respectively. The cost of operation of machine was found 1996.53 `/ha. Developed tractor operated liquid urea applicator would help in improving conventional practices which are not aligned with environmental protection (e.g. gaseous emissions and nutrient losses) and boost the adoption rate of mechanized fertigation in the crops.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjetey J A, Campbell L C, Searle P G E and Saffigna P. 1999. Studies on depth of placement of urea on nitrogen recovery in wheat grown on a red-brown earth in Australia. Journal of Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 54: 227–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009775622609

Anonymous. 2021. Annual Report 2019–20, Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India. https://fert.nic.in/sites/default/files/2020-09/Annual- Report-2019–20.pdf (Visited on 02/02/2022).

Anonymous. 2022. Consumption of fertilizers. https://www.indiastat.com/data/agriculture/total-consumption-fertilisers/data-year/all-years (Visited: 04/02/2022).

Canfora L, Malusa E, Salvati L, Renzi G, Petrarulo M and Benedetti A. 2015. Short-term impact of two liquid organic fertilizers on Solanum lycopersicum L. rhizosphere Eubacteria and Archaea diversity. Applied Soil Ecology 88: 50–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.11.017

Chakraborty D, Nagarajan S, Aggarwal P, Gupta V K, Tomar R K, Garg R N and Kalra N. 2008. Effect of mulching on soil and plant water status, and the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a semi-arid environment. Agriculture water Management 95(12): 1323–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.001

Cheng Y, Ying Z, Zhou Z, Zhang Z, Qi X, Song C and Li K. 2017. Variables of pneumatic fertilizer injection machine based on PID algorithm design and experiment of fertilizer injection control system. Journal Shenyang Agricultural University 48: 320–27.

Dhanger P, Jain M, Rani V, Kumar H, Jaideep J, Mor A and Sachin. 2021. Comparison of the energy consumption in traditional and advanced paddy residue management technologies for wheat sowing. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 20(3): 846–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56042/ijtk.v20i3.33276

Dhanger P, Jain M, Rani V, Kumar M and Ghanghas S. 2022. Paddy straw management practices in Northern India for improved efficiency and techno-economic feasibility. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92(4): 526–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i4.124012

Gu J and Gao H. 2000. Prospects of technological innovation for improving fertilizer utilization. Transaction of the Chinese Society of Agriculture Engineering 2: 17–20.

Ismail K M, Wheaton F W, Douglass L W and Potts W. 1991. Modeling ammonia volatilization from loamy sand soil treated with liquid urea. Transactions of the ASAE 34: 756–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31727

Liu X J, Mosier A R, Halvorson A D and Zhang F S. 2006. The impact of nitrogen placement and tillage on NO, N2O, CH4 and CO2 fluxes from a clay loam soil. Journal of Plant and Soil 280: 177–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2950-8

Parveen. 2022. ‘Design, Development and Evaluation of Electronic Metering Mechanism for Liquid Urea Application in Straw Mulch Field’. PhD Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.

Qi J T, Tian X L, Li Y, Fan X H, Yuan H F and Zhao J L. 2020. Design and experiment of a subsoiling variable rate fertilization machine. International Journal of Agriculture and Bio-Engineering 13: 118–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20201304.5757

Qiu T. 2016. Research on fertilizer injection technology in the process of wheat planting. Cultivation and breeding 3(1): 20.

Rahman M A, Chikushia B J, Saifizzamanb M and Laurenc J G. 2005. Rice straw mulching and nitrogen response of no-till wheat following rice in Bangladesh. Field Crops Research 91(1): 71–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.06.010

Salah M A. 2006. Effect of nitrogen and manure fertilizer on grain quality, baking and rheological properties of wheat grown in sandy soil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86: 205–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2354

Singh J, Mahal J S, Manes G S and Singh M. 2013. Development and evaluation of nitrogen (liquid urea) applicator for straw mulched no-till wheat. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 15(4): 30–38.

Spangberg J, Hansson P A, Tidaker P and Jonsson H. 2011. Environmental impact of meat meal fertilizer vs. chemical fertilizer. Resources Conservation and Recycling 55: 1078–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.002

Tian G, Cai Z, Cao J and Li X. 2001. Factors affecting ammonia volatilization from a rice-wheat rotation system. Chemosphere 42(2): 123–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00117-X

Zhan L. 2015. ‘Design and test analysis of the constant ratio fertilizer injection control system of the dual-variable fertilizer injection machine’. MSc Thesis, Shihezi University, Shihezi China.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-01-16

Published

2023-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DHANGER, P., KHURANA, R., DIXIT, A. K., SINGH, M., & MAHAL, A. K. (2023). Performance evaluation of an electronically controlled tractor-operated applicator for liquid urea application. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(2), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i2.132319
Citation