Nuclear-cytoplasmic interaction for stigma receptivity in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) hybrid development


Abstract views: 103 / PDF downloads: 115

Authors

  • SHAHIL KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • S K CHAKRABARTY ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • NAVEEN SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • ANUJ KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • MANJUNATH PRASAD C T ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
  • SUDIPTA BASU ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i9.136772

Keywords:

Artificial pollination, Brassica juncea, Cytoplasmic male sterile line, Stigma receptivity

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2020–21 and 2021–22 at the research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to study the response of stigma receptivity in 30 new CMS lines, based on 3 new cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) sources namely, Moricandia, erucoides and berthautii of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] using two traits, i.e. per cent siliquae set and seed set per siliquae which are important for hybrid seed yield in seed production. CMS lines showed varying responses to distinct genetic backgrounds. Per cent siliquae set and seed set per siliquae changed due to cytoplasmic-nuclear interaction. Studies on stigma receptivity evaluation using manual pollination up to 7 days since anthesis revealed that it varies among the 3 CMS sources of Brassica juncea. Peak stigma receptivity reached up to 2 to 3 days following flower opening. Among the 3 CMS sources berthautii showed higher stigma receptivity compared to Moricandia and erucoides. Among the nuclear genotypes, Pusa Tarak was the most promising. The new CMS sources would be useful for hybrid development based on higher stigma receptivity for hybrid seed production. These findings will aid in the selection of appropriate nucleo-cytoplasmic combinations for use in the B. juncea hybrid breeding programmes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banga O and Banga S. 2017. Genetic control of stigma receptivity in Brassica juncea. Journal of Genetics 96: 109–18.

Bhat S R, Kumar P and Prakash S. 2008. An improved cytoplasmic male sterile (Diplotaxis berthautii) Brassica juncea: Identification of restorer and molecular characterization. Euphytica 159: 145–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9467-6

Bhat S R, Vijayan P, Ashutosh, Dwivedi K K and Prakash S. 2006. Diplotaxis erucoides-induced cytoplasmic male sterility in Brassica juncea is rescued by the Moricandia arvensis restorer: genetic and molecular analyses. Plant Breeding 125(2:) 150–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01184.x

Chakrabarty S K, Yadav S K and Yadav J B. 2007. Evaluation of stigma receptivity in cytoplasmic male sterile lines of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss. (In) Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress held at Wuhan, China, March 25–30.

Chakrabarty S K, Chandrashekar U S, Prasad M, Yadav J B, Singh J N and Dadlani M. 2011. Protogyny and self-incompatibility in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss)-A new tool for hybrid development. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 71: 170.

Heslop-Harrison Y. 2000. Control gates and micro-ecology: The pollen stigma interaction in perspective. Annals of Botany 85 (Supplementary A): 5–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.1063

Jamshed M, Sankaranarayanan S, Abhinandan K and Samuel M A 2020. Stigma receptivity is controlled by functionally redundant MAPK pathway components in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 13: 1582–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.08.015

Kumar S, Sairam R K and Prabhu K V. 2013. Physiological traits for high temperature stress tolerance in Brassica juncea. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 18: 89–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-013-0015-1

Lavana K S and Banga S S. 1984. Floral biology in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Coss]. Genetica Agraria 38: 131–38.

Layek N, Mula G, Sarkar A and Roy B. 2021. Economics of mustard seed production-An analytical study from Terai Zone of West Bengal. Indian Journal of Extension Education 57: 78–85.

Maity A, Chakrabarty S K, Pramanik P, Gupta R, Parmar S S and Sharma D K. 2019. Response of stigma receptivity in CMS and male fertile line of Indian mustard (B. juncea) under variable thermal conditions. International Journal of Biometeorology 63: 143–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1645-9

Mankar K S, Yadav J B, Singhal N C, Prakash Surendra and Gaur Ashok. 2007. Studies on stigma receptivity in Indian mustard. Seed Research 35: 148–50.

Panjabi P, Yadava S K, Kumar N, Bangkim R and Ramchiary N. 2019. Breeding Brassica juncea and B. rapa for sustainable oilseed production in the changing climate: Progress and prospects. Genomic Designing of Climate-Smart Oilseed Crops, pp. 275–369. Kole C (Ed). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93536-2_6

Prakash S. 2001. Utilization of wild germplasm of Brassica allies in developing cytoplasmic male sterility-fertility restoration systems in Indian mustard Brassica juncea. H Liu and T Fu (Eds.) (In) Proceedings of International Symposium Rapeseed Science, Science Press, New York, pp. 63–7.

Pua E C and Dogulas C J. 2004. Brassica. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 54, pp. 344. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06164-0

Qin Y and Li C. 2020. Advances in the molecular mechanisms underlying stigma receptivity in higher plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 506.

Rai B. 1991. Seed production. Oilseed Brassica in Indian Agriculture, pp. 241–56. Chopra V L and S Prakash (Eds). Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd., New Delhi.

Ramanathan T. 2004. Applied Genetics of Oilseed Crops, pp. 442. Daya Books.

Rawat D S and Anand I J. 1979. Male sterility in Indian mustard. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 39: 412–14.

Sanzol J, Rallo P and Herrero M. 2003. Asynchronous development of stigmatic receptivity in the pear (Pyrus communis, Rosaceae) flower. American Journal of Botany 90: 78–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.1.78

USDA. 2013. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Acreage reports. Yi W, Law S E, Mccoy D and Wetzstein H Y. 2006. Stigma development and receptivity in almond (Prunus dulcis). Annals of Botany 97: 57–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj013

Downloads

Submitted

2023-05-23

Published

2023-09-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, S., CHAKRABARTY, S. K., SINGH, N., KUMAR, A., C T, M. P., & BASU, S. (2023). Nuclear-cytoplasmic interaction for stigma receptivity in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) hybrid development. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93(9), 972–977. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i9.136772
Citation