Effect of prey on predation, growth and biology of green lacewing (Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi)
236 / 126
Keywords:
Biology, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi, Growth index, PreyAbstract
The larvae of the polyphagous predator, green lacewing [Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersen)] was reared on natural prey including cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae), bean aphid (Aphis craccivora), nymphs of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula), eggs and neonate larvae of Spodoptera litura and eggs of Corcyra cephalonica to study the effect of prey regimes on the predation and the biology of the predator. The lacewing grub preyed significantly highest number of prey units (415.50 eggs/ grub) of C. cephalonica eggs which was significantly more than the S. litura eggs (250.60 eggs/ grub), A. biguttula biguttula (185.00 nymphs/ grub), B. brassicae (127.50 aphids/grub), A. craccivora (119.00 aphids/grub) and neonates of S.litura (62.25 larvae/grub). The larval duration varied from 7.50 to 15.235 days on different preys which was seven day less in the grubs reared on eggs than the grubs fed on insect as prey. Larval survival was significantly highest (97.82%) on C. cephalonica eggs. The pupal period varied from 7.50 days to 8.63 days. The grubs reared on eggs of C. cephalonica and S. litura showed longer pupal period. On insects as prey, the growth index (GI) of larvae was significantly less (5.56–8.58) compared to the larvae reared on egg-hosts. The weight of grubs preying on other hosts was 35–50% less compared to those reared on C. cephalonica eggs. Relative inadequacy of lepidopteran neonates and aphids except B. brassicae as prey for the young larvae adversely affected the larval survival, GI and adult emergence may be due to reduced nutritional support exerting adverse effect on growth and causing moulting distress.
Downloads
References
Canard M and Principi M M. 1984. Life histories and behaviour. (in) Biology of Chrysopidae, pp 57–149. Canard M, Semeria Y and New TR (Eds). Dr W Junk Publishers, The Hague.
Hagen K S, Bombosh S and Mc Murry J A. 1976. The biology and impact of predator. (In) Theory and Practices of Biological Control, pp 93–142. Huffaker C B and Messenger P S (Eds.) Academic Press. Inc, New York.
Henry Charles S, Brooks Stephen J, Johnson James B, Venkatesan Thiruvengadam and Duelli Peter. 2010. The most important lacewing species in Indian agricultural crops, Chrysoperla sillemi (Esben-Petersen), is a subspecies of Chrysoperla zastrowi (Esben- Petersen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Natural History 44: 2543–55.
Hoffman M P and Frodsham A C. 1993. Natural Enemies of Vegetable Insect Pests, A Cornell Co-operative Experiment Publication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Khulbe Puja, Maurya R P and Khan M A. 2005. Biology of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) on different host insects. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 13(2): 351–4.
Liu Tong-Xian and Chen Tian-Ye. 2001. Effect of three aphid species (Homoptera:Aphididae) on development, survival and predation of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 36(3): 361–6.
Saminathan V R, Muralibaskaran R K and Mahdevan N R. 1999. Biology and predatory potential of green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) on different insect hosts. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 67(8):165–7.
Sattar M. 2010. ‘Investigation on Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) as a biological control agent against cotton pests in Pakistan’. Ph D thesis, pp 193 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Crop Protection, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan.
Ulhaq M M, Sattar A, Salihah Z, Farid A, Usman A and Khattak S U K. 2006. Effect of different artificial diets on the biology of adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea Stephens). Songklankarin Journal of Science and Technology 28: 1–8.
Venkatesan T, Poorani J, Jalali SK, Srinivasamurthy K, Ashok Kumar G, Lalitha Y and Rajeshwari R. 2008. Confirmation of the occurrence of Chrysoperla zastrowi arabica (Esben-Petersen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in India. Journal of Biological Control 22 (1): 143–7.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.