Genotypic differences in root architecture and physiological characteristics in mango (Mangifera indica) under drought
556 / 544
Keywords:
Coefficient correlation, Drought, Mango, Moisture stressAbstract
An experiment was conducted at the research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during 2020 and 2021 to study the genotypic differences in root architecture and physiological characteristics in mango (Mangifera indica L.) under drought. One-year-old polyembryonic 7 mango rootstock genotypes were exposed to normal irrigation and drought conditions for 24 days. The drought-induced increased total plant weight and dry weight in Kurukkan. The shoot dry weight decreased in all genotypes ranging from 5.13% in OLP-Z-6/1 to 81.82% in Kurukkan. There was a lesser reduction in membrane stability index in Kurukkan and K-5, stomata count in Kurukkan, Olour and OPK-3-7/12 at the end of the drought period. Root surface area increased under drought in Kurukkan, while it decreased more in K-5. Correlation studies confirmed a strong positive relationship between relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI), number of stomata (SC), number of leaves (NL), root tips (RT) and root forks (NRF); MSI and number of root tips (NRT); dry weight of the whole plant and root surface area (RSA); the dry weight of roots and root volume (RV), RSA, and plant height (Ph); root length (RL) and RSA, RT, and NRF. Kurukkan was identified as drought-tolerant based on a higher SC, RWC, RV, RSA, dry mass, NRT and NRF. Results indicated that the root indices offer a promising strategy for the screening of drought-tolerant mango genotypes.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2015. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations website, United Nations, https://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/index.shtml
Arsenault J L, Poulcur S, Messier C and Guay R. 1995. WinRHlZO™, a root-measuring system with a unique overlap correction method. Horticulture Science 30(4): 906D–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.4.906D
Barrs H D and Weatherley P E. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15(3): 413–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
Bolat I, Dikilitas M, Ercisli S, Ikinci A and Tonkaz T. 2014. The effect of water stress on some morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics and bud success on apple and quince rootstocks. Scientific World 2014: 769–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/769732
Bray E A, Bailey-Serres J and Weretilnyk E. 2000. Responses to abiotic stress. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, pp. 1158–1203. American Society of Plant Physiology, Rockville USA.
Chaves M M and Oliveira M M. 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: Prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2365–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh269
Geng D L, Lu L Y, Yan, M J, Shen X X, Jiang L J, Li H Y and Guan Q M. 2019. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses of roots from Malus sieversii under drought stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 18(6): 1280–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62571-2
Jombart T. 2008. Adegenet: An R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24: 1403–05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129
Khoyerdi F F, Shamshiri M H and Estaji A. 2016. Changes in some physiological and osmotic parameters of several pistachio genotypes under drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae 198: 44–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.028
Lozano-Montana P A, Sarmiento F, Mejia-Sequera L M, Alvarez- Florez F and Melgarejo L M.2021. Physiological, biochemical and transcriptional responses of Passiflora edulis Sims f. edulis under progressive drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae 275: 109655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109655
Luvaha E, Netondo G W and Ouma G. 2010. Effect of water deficit on the physiological and morphological characteristics of Mango (Mangifera indica) rootstock seedlings. American Journal of Plant Physiology 5(1): 7–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpp.2010.7.21
Sairam R K. 1994. Effect of moisture stress on physiological activities of two contrasting wheat genotypes. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 32: 594–97.
Vetterlein D, Phalempin M, Lippold E, Schluter S, Schreiter S, Ahmed M A, Wang S, Liang D, Li C, Hao Y, Ma F and Shu H.2012. Influence of drought stress on the cellular ultrastructure and antioxidant system in leaves of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive apple rootstocks. Plant physiology and Biochemistry 51: 81–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.014
Wang, S, Liang D, Li C, Hao Y, Ma F and Shu H.2012. Influence of drought stress on the cellular ultrastructure and antioxidant system in leaves of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive apple rootstocks. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 51: 81–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.014
Zahid Z, Khan M K R, Hameed A, Akhtar M, Ditta A, Hassan H M and Farid G. 2021. Dissection of drought tolerance in upland cotton through morpho-physiological and biochemical traits at seedling stage. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 627107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.627107
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.