Biochemical profiling of tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) genotypes
328 / 334 / 101
Keywords:
GCV, Genetic advance, Genotypes, Heritability, PCV, TraitsAbstract
An experiment was conducted out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2021–22 and 2022–23 at Litchi and Mango Research Station (Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh), Nagrota Bagwan, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh to study the biochemical profiling of tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes. The experiment comprises of 357 genotypes including varieties, advanced breeding lines and exotic germplasm belonging to the tetraploid group of potato were evaluated in augmented block design. Data were recorded on different biochemical attributes. Adjusted mean values indicated that CP 3145 (10.15ᵒBrix) for total soluble solids, CP 1689 (36.89 mg/g) for total polyphenols, CP 1302 (28.68 mg/100 g) for ascorbic acid, CP 3891 (24.41 µg/g) for total carotenoids content, CP 1667 (0.21%,) for total sugars, CP 1667 (0.10%) for reducing sugars and CP 1884 (0.06%) for non-reducing sugars were the top ranked genotypes. High PCV and GCV were observed for total polyphenols and total carotenoids content. High heritability coupled with high genetic advance was recorded for total polyphenols, ascorbic acid content, starch content, total carotenoids content and reducing sugars. Principal component analysis indicated the three most informative principal components with more than one eigen value, accounting for 57.40% of the total variance for all traits.
Downloads
References
Andre C M, Ghislain M, Bertin P, Oufir M, Herrera M D R, Hoffmann L, Hausman J F, Larondelle Y and Evers D. 2017. Andean potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum L.) as a source of antioxidant and mineral micronutrients. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 55(2): 366–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062740i
Brar A, Bhatia A K, Pandey V and Kumari P. 2017. Biochemical and phytochemical properties of potato: A review. Chemical Science Review and Letters 6(21): 117–29.
Burton G M and De Vane E H. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated colonal material. Agronomy Journal 45: 310–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x
Choi I, Chun J, Choi H S, Park J, Kim N G, Lee S K, Park C H, Jeong K H, Nam J W, Cho J and Cho K. 2020. Starch characteristics, sugars and thermal properties of processing potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars developed in Korea. American Journal of Potato Research 97: 308–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-020-09779-z
Dalamu, Singh B, Shivali B, Pinky R, Reena S and Alka J. 2015. Assesment of phytochemical diversity in Indian potato cultivars. Indian Journal of Horticulture 72(3): 447–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2015.00090.0
Das B, Sarkar K K, Priya B, Dudhane A S, Pradhan A M and Das A. 2014. Evaluation of early and late harvested potatoes for yield, quality and storability. International Journal of Bio- resource and Stress Management 5(1): 22–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0976-4038.5.1.004
Datta S, Das R and Singh D. 2015. Evaluation of genetic diversity for yield and quality parameters of different potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 7(1): 235–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i1.596
DuBois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A and Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28(3): 350–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
Grommers H E and Van der Krogt D A. 2009. Potato starch: Production, modifications and uses. Food Science and Technology 511–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-746275-2.00011-2
Johnson H W, Robinson H F and Comstock R E. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 47: 310–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
Kaur S and Aggarwal P. 2014. Evaluation of antioxidant phytochemicals in different genotypes of potato. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 4(7): 167–72.
Mahdavi R, Nikniaz Z, Rafraf M and Jouyban A. 2010. Determination and comparison of total polyphenol and vitamin C contents of natural fresh and commercial fruit juices. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 9(10): 968–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.968.972
Makkar H P S. 2003. Quantification of Tannins in Tree and Shrub Foliage, pp. 102–07. Makkar H P S (Ed). A Laboratory Manual, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0273-7
Marwaha R S, Pandey S K, Kumar D, Singh S V and Kumar P. 2010. Potato processing scenario in India: Industrial constraints, future projections, challenges ahead and remedies: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 47: 137–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0026-0
Miller G L. 1972. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Analytical Chemistry 31: 426–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Mostofa M, Roy T S, Chakraborty R, Ferdous J, Nowroz F and Noor R. 2019. Effect of vermicompost and tuber size on total soluble solids, sucrose and skin color of potato under ambient storage condition. Azarian Journal of Agriculture 6(3): 58–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/azarinj.008
Pardo J E, Alvarruiz A, Perez J I, Gomez R and Varon R. 2000. Physical-chemical and sensory quality evaluation of potato varieties (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Food Quality 23: 149–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2000.tb00202.x
Pradhan A M, Sarkar K K and Konar A. 2015. Genetic divergence in some Indian potato genotypes. Environment and Ecology 33(3A): 1225–27.
Ranganna S. 1979. Manual of Analysis of Fruits and Vegetables Products. Tata Mc Graw Hill Book Company, New Delhi, India. Sattar M A, Uddin M Z, Islam M R, Bhuiyan M K R and Rahman M
S. 2011. Genetic divergence in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 36(1): 165–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v36i1.9240
Seid E, Tessema L, Abebe T, Solomon A, Chindi A, Hirut B, Negash K, Shunka E, Mogse Z, Burgos G and Mendes T. 2023. Genetic variability for micronutrient content and tuber yield traits among biofortified potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) clones in Ethiopia. Plants 12(14): 2625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142625
Sekhon B S and Sharma A. 2019. Genetic studies based on selected morpho-physiological parameters in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 32(1): 59–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-1926.2019.00008.1
Sharma J R. 1998. Statistical and Biometrical Techniques in Plant Breeding, pp. 432. New Age International, New Delhi, India. Singh B, Goutam U, Kukreja S, Sharma J, Sood S and Bhardwaj V. 2021. Potato biofortification: An effective way to fight global hidden hunger. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 27(10): 2297–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-01081-4
Singh J, Kumar D, Sood S, Bhardwaj V, Kumar R and Kumar S. 2024. Genetic variability and association studies for yield and its attributes in cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Vegetable Science 51(1): 148–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61180/vegsci.2024.v51.i1.20
Tessema G L, Mohammed A W and Abebe D T. 2022. Genetic variability studies for tuber yield and yield attributes in Ethiopian released potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties. PeerJ 10: e12860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12860
Thomas P and Joshi M R. 1997. Total carotenoids content. Potato Research 20: 78.
Unche P B, Misal M B, Borgaonkar S B, Godhawale G V, Chavan B D and Sawant D R. 2008. Genetic variability studies in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). International Journal of Plant Sciences 3: 16–18.
Ward J H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(301): 236–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
Zeleke A A, Abebe T D and Getahun B B. 2021. Estimation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes for tuber yield and yield related traits. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 9(12): 2124–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i12.2124-2130.4301
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.