Pollen biology and metaxenic studies on early maturing grape (Vitis vinifera) genotypes


1205 / 652 / 151

Authors

  • ASHOK DHAKAD ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • V B PATEL ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi image/svg+xml
  • S K SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • M K VERMA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • GYAN P MISHRA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • V B MHETRE ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • CHAVLESH KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • RAKESH SINGH ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi image/svg+xml
  • S RAJKUMAR ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi image/svg+xml
  • KISHOR GAIKWAD ICAR-National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i10.141725

Keywords:

Pollen parent, Pollination, Pollinizer, Pusa Navrang, Vitis vinifera

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted during 2020–21 and 2021–22 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to study the impact of open-, self-, and cross-pollination on metaxenic traits (berries) and the incidence of cleistogamy in grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Seven different cross-combinations were used on the grape variety Pusa Navrang, which were planted at 3 m × 3 m spacing and trained on the Y-trellis training system. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD) with four replications. The incidence of cleistogamy, berry set, retention percentage, and the metaxenia effect of pollen grains in different grapevine varieties, namely, Pusa Navrang (PN), Black Muscat (BM), Pusa Swarnika (PS), Beauty Seedless (BS), Perlette (PER), Male Hybrid (MH), were studied. Also, pollen quantity and viability were determined for the different grapevine varieties under study. Depending on the genotypes and whether the fruit set is obtained inside the covered flowers, cleistogamy was confirmed. A significantly higher berry set (40–85%) and retention (32–77%) were recorded in open- and self-pollinated flowers. The total number of pollens/anther in six grape genotypes ranged from 7916.62–23832.02, whereas the maximum active pollen rates were noted in the Male Hybrid (70.01%) and Black Muscat (66.80%). The pollens from the Beauty Seedless genotype exhibited significant enhancement of metaxenic traits such as berry set, retention, and size in Pusa Navrang. Therefore, utilizing Beauty Seedless as a pollen parent in grape breeding programmes holds promise for enhancing berry set and overall berry quality, thus enhancing the hybridization efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blidariu C and Dobrei A. 2012. Research concerning pollen germination of some grapevine varieties in the condition of D S Timisoara. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology 16: 248–50.

Burcak I S C I. 2021. Pollen characteristics of some grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 5(3): 279–86.

Eti S. 1991. Determination of pollen germination and viability in some fruit cultivars by some in vitro tests Cukurova University. Journal of Agricultural Science 6: 69–81.

Heazlewood J E and Wilson S. 2004. Anthesis, pollination and fruitset in Pinot Noir. Vitis 43: 65–68.

Jovanovic-Cvetkovic T, Sutalo V, Kupe M, Ercisli S, Zivotic A and Pasalic B. 2022. Influence of interaction effects of the different pollenizers on the Blatina variety (Vitis vinifera L.) grape cluster and seed characteristics. Plants 11(3): 420.

Kelen M and Demirtas I. 2003. Pollen viability, germination capability and pollen production level of some grape varieties (Vitis vinifera L.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 25(3): 229–33. Keulemans J, Brusselle A, Eyssen R, Vercammen J and Daele G. 1996. Fruit weight in apple as influenced by seed number and pollinizer. Acta Horticulturae 423: 201–10.

Kowalczyk B A, Bieniasz M and Kostecka-Gugała A. 2022. Flowering biology of selected hybrid grape cultivars under temperate climate conditions. Agriculture 12(5): 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050655

Kumar K and Das B. 1996. Studies on xenia in almond (Prunus dulcis Miller D A Webb). Journal of Horticultural Science 71: 545–49.

Mizrahi Y, Mouyal J, Nerd A and Sitrit Y. 2004. Metaxenia in the vine cacti Hylocereus polyrhizus and Selenicereus megalanthus spp. Annals of Botany 93: 469–72.

MoAFW. 2023. Horticultural Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Govt of India. Accessed on August 19, 2023. https://agricoop.nic.in/en/StatHortEst

Rane P, Thakre M, Verma M K, Kumar C, Prakash J, Srivastava V P R S, Murukan N, Chawla G, Mandal P K, Kumar H, Jadhav A K, Varghese E, Patel V B and Singh S K. 2024. Studies on pollen micro-morphology, pollen storage methods, and cross- compatibility among grape (Vitis spp.) genotypes. Frontiers in Plant Sciences 15: 1353808. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1353808

Sabir A. 2011. Influences of self- and cross-pollinations on berry set, seed characteristics and germination progress of grape (Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Italia’). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 13: 591–94.

Sabir A. 2014. Xenia and metaxenia in grapes: Differences in berry and seed characteristics of maternal grape cv. ‘Narince’ (Vitis vinifera L.) as influenced by different pollen sources. Plant Biology 17(2): 567–73.

Samaan L G, Taha M W, Hassan A H and Boraby M S E. 1981. Pollination and serological studies on Egyptian grapes. Vitis 20: 293–301.

Sgarbi E, Bignami C, Meglioraldi S, Storchi M, Silvestroni O, Barbieri C and Baroni A. 2010. Pollination and fruit set: Critical factors for the production of the grapevine cultivar 'Malbo Gentile'. (In) 28th International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on Plant 932: 155–62.

Staudt G. 1999. Opening of flowers and time of anthesis in grapevines, Vitis vinifera (L.). Vitis 38: 15–20.

Tello J, Montemayor M I, Forneck A and Ibanez J. 2018. A new image-based tool for the high throughput phenotyping of pollen viability: Evaluation of inter-and intra-cultivar diversity in grapevine. Plant Methods 14(1): 1–17.

Vasconcelos M C, Greven M, Winefield C S, Trought M C and Raw V. 2009. The flowering process of Vitis vinifera: A review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 60: 411–34.

Verma M K and Usha K. 2006. Fruits and horticultural technology: A profile. ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, pp. 1–18.

Wang L, Wu J, Chen J, Fu D, Zhang C, Cai C and Ou L. 2015. A simple pollen collection, dehydration, and long-term storage method for litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Scientia Horticulturae 188: 78–83.

Submitted

2023-08-30

Published

2024-10-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DHAKAD, A. ., PATEL, V. B. ., SINGH, S. K. ., VERMA, M. K. ., MISHRA, G. P. ., MHETRE, V. B. ., KUMAR, C. ., SINGH, R. ., RAJKUMAR, S. ., & GAIKWAD, K. . (2024). Pollen biology and metaxenic studies on early maturing grape (Vitis vinifera) genotypes. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 94(10), 1094–1099. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i10.141725
Citation