Exploring available water resources in Bahraich district of Uttar Pradesh: A comprehensive study


338 / 459

Authors

  • SHIV SHANKER CHAUDHARI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • SUSAMA SUDHISHRI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • ANCHAL DASS ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • MANOJ KHANNA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • PRAMOD KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • VINAY KUMAR SEHGHAL ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • RABINDRA PADARIA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • BLESSY V A ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Regional Centre, Udhagamandalam, Tamil Nadu image/svg+xml
  • LOVE KUMAR Bihar Agriculture University, Sabour, Bihar image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.143427

Keywords:

Canal water, Curve number, Ground water, Water resource management

Abstract

Present study was carried out during 2018–22 at Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh focusing on groundwater, runoff, and canal water suggesting that a sizable database is essential for effectively managing water resources. Groundwater quantity was estimated using water level fluctuation (WLF), runoff using GIS coupled with curve number and canal water volume using equivalent length factor methods. This study revealed that the contribution of groundwater was more than 52.5%, whereas runoff (45.61%) and canal water (1.89%). Higher amounts of total available water observed in Mihipurwa (305.3 million cubic meter, MCM), Mahsi (211.6 MCM), Chittaura (189.3 MCM) and Nawabganj (184.4 MCM) blocks due to denser vegetation cover and moderate to low curve number values, while Risia (96.5 MCM) had the lowest amounts of available water in juxtaposition with the other blocks due to high industrial draft, higher drop down in the depth of post-monsoon groundwater level and minimal canal water irrigation. The sandy soil predominant in Jarwal had the lowest annual runoff (117.54 mm) while Nawabganj had the highest (359.84 mm) followed by Balha and Huzoorpur due to having a higher elevation over the other blocks. The runoff ratio was found to be larger in Nawabganj (27.74%), followed by Balha (23.06%) and lowest in Mihipurwa (14.89%) followed by Chittaurah (14.91%). Kaisarganj (11.6 MCM) had the highest amount of canal water resources accessible, followed by Mahsi (6.8 MCM) and Huzoorpur (6.1 MCM), while Balha and Nawabganj had the lowest amounts of canal water resources at 0.1 MCM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amutha R and Porchelvan P. 2009. Estimation of surface runoff in Malattar sub-watershed using SCS-CN method. Journal of The Indian Society of Remote Sensing 37: 291–304.

Bansode A and Patil K A. 2014. Estimation of runoff by using SCS curve number method and ArcGIS. International Journal of Science and Engineering Research 5(7): 1283–287.

Bartlett M S, Parolari A J, Mc Donnell J J and Porporato A. 2016. Beyond the SCS-CN method: A theoretical framework for spatially lumped rainfall-runoff response. Water Resource Research 52: 4608–627.

Bhanja S N, Mukherjee A, Saha D, Velicogna I and Famiglietti J S. 2016. Validation of GRACE-based groundwater storage anomaly using in situ groundwater level measurements in India. Journal of Hydrology 543: 729–38.

Bjornlund V, Bjornlund H and Rooyen A F. 2020. Exploring the factors causing the poor performance of most irrigation schemes in post-independence sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development 36: 54–101.

Chaudhari S S, Sudhishri S, Khanna M, Dass A, Rosin K G, Bhattacharya R and Maurya R. 2020. Water budgeting in major rabi crops under surface irrigation in Western Indo- Gangetic Plains. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(11): 2185–91.

Chow V T, Maidment D K and Mays LW. 2002. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA.

Halder S, Roy M B and Roy P K. 2020. Analysis of groundwater level trend and groundwater drought using standard groundwater level index: A case study of an eastern river basin of West Bengal, India. Applied Sciences 2: 1–24.

Karunanidhi D, Anand B, Subramani T and Srinivasa Moorthy K. 2020. Rainfall surface runoff estimation for the Lower Bhavani basin in south India using SCS-CN model and geospatial techniques. Environmental Earth Sciences 79(13): 1–19.

Kaur S, Agarwal R and Kumar S T M. 2009. A micro level assessment of water resources: A case study. Journal of Indian Water Resource Society 29(1): 17–21.

Kishore P, Chand S and Srivastava S K. 2022. Potential area of micro-irrigation and its outreach across Indian states. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92(9): 1056–060.

Kumar S, Venkateswaran S and Kannan R. 2017. Rainfall- runoff estimation using SCS-CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed of the Vaniyar sub basin, South India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 3: 1–8.

Liu X and Li J. 2008. Application of SCS model in estimation of runoff from small watershed in loess plateau of China. Chinese Geographical Science 18: 235–41.

Pekel J F, Cottam A, Gorelick N and Belward A S. 2016. High- resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540: 418–22.

Ray S S, Dadhwal V K and Navalgund R R. 2002. Performance evaluation of an irrigation command area using remote sensing: A case study of Mahi command, Gujarat, India. Agricultural Water Management 56(2): 81–91.

Scanlon B R, Fakhreddine S, Rateb A, de Graaf I, Famiglietti J, Gleeson T and Zheng C. 2023. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment 4(2): 87–101.

Sinha R S. 2021. State of groundwater in Uttar Pradesh. A situation analysis with critical overview and sustainable solutions ground water action group, Water Aid. Available online: https://cdn.cseindia.org/gic/state-of-ground-water (Accessed on 15 February 2022)

Soulis K X and Valiantzas J D. 2012. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds–the two-CN system approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16 (3): 1001–015.

USDA C S. 1972. National Engineering Handbook, Hydrology Section 4: 4–10.

Waikar M L and Nilawar A P. 2014. Identification of groundwater potential zone using remote sensing and GIS technique. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology 3(5): 12163–74.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-10-08

Published

2024-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CHAUDHARI, S. S. ., SUDHISHRI, S. ., DASS, A. ., KHANNA, M. ., KUMAR, P. ., SEHGHAL, V. K. ., PADARIA, R. ., V A, B. ., & KUMAR, L. . (2024). Exploring available water resources in Bahraich district of Uttar Pradesh: A comprehensive study. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 94(5), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.143427
Citation