Design and evaluation of slow sand and UV filters for effective nutrient recycling in closed soilless cultivation

KAMAL GURMIT  SINGH; ANGREJ  SINGH; AAMIR ISHAQ  SHAH; GURPARTEET  SINGH

doi:10.56093/ijas.v94i5.143652

Authors

KAMAL GURMIT SINGH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
ANGREJ SINGH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
AAMIR ISHAQ SHAH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
GURPARTEET SINGH University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.143652

Keywords:

Closed soilless cultivation, Leachate recirculation, Pathogen removal efficiency, Slow sand filter, UV filter

Abstract

Nutrient and water use efficiency can be improved in soilless cultivation systems by recirculating the leachate. However, untreated leachate contains particulate matter that may clog drip emitters and root pathogens which can pose a threat to the crop health if reintroduced into the system. To address this issue, an ultraviolet (UV) filter was developed to complement the slow sand filter to enhance its treatment efficiency in removing root pathogens. The experiment was conducted during 2019 and 2020 at Punjab Agicultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab to assess the effectiveness of the UV filter in removing pathogens, specifically Dickey zeae and Xanthomonas, from the leachate in a closed soilless cultivation system. Pre and post-treatment measurements were made 40 days after transplanting (DAT) and 80 DAT to evaluate the efficiency of the UV filter. The results revealed that combined UV and slow sand filters substantially treated the raw leachate. At 40 DAT, the pathogen removal efficiency was 94.8%, while it was 92% at 80 DAT. The findings highlight the importance and effectiveness of using the UV filter as an additional treatment step in closed soilless cultivation systems with significant improvement in the overall removal efficiency of root pathogens from the leachate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashraf A, Singh K G and Singh A. 2020. Development and evaluation of nutrient reuse system in soilless media grown cucumber under protected cultivation. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44(9): 1241–257.

Corral A F, Yenal U and Strickle R. 2014. Comparison of slow sand filtration and microfiltration inland desalination via reverse osmosis. Desalination 334: 1–9.

Ehret D, Alsanius B, Wohanka W, Menzies J and Utkhede R. 2001. Disinfestation of recirculating nutrient solutions in greenhouse horticulture. Agronomie 21(4): 323–39.

El-Azazy M, El-Fadel M and Zeinati M. 2015. Slow sand filtration for wastewater treatment in agricultural applications. Journal of Environmental Management 150: 189–98.

Elbana M, de Cartagena F R and Puig-Bargues J. 2012. Effectiveness of sand media filters for removing turbidity and recovering dissolved oxygen from a reclaimed effluent used for micro-irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 111: 27–33.

Fan M, Wang Y, Xue N, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Wang M and Gao B. 2018. Coagulation of TiO2 nanoparticles-natural organic matter composite contaminants in various aquatic media: Fluorescence characteristics, flocs properties and membrane fouling abilities. Separation and Purification Technology 205: 113–20.

Fitriani N, Ardiyanti P E, Kuncoro E P, Budiyanto W D, Isnadina D R M, ahyudianto F E and Mohamed R M S R. 2020. Behaviour of schmutzdecke with varied filtration rates of slow sand filter to remove total coliforms. Heliyon 6(4): 03736.

Ghauch A, Baalbaki A, Amasha M, El Asmar R and Tantawi O. 2017. Contribution of persulfate in UV-254 nm activated systems for complete degradation of chloramphenicol antibiotic in water. Chemical Engineering Journal 317: 1012–025.

Hartman D. 2011. Perfecting your spread plate technique. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education 12(2): 204–05.

Keyikoglu R, Karatas O, Rezania H, Kobya M, Vatanpour V and Khataee A. 2021. A review on treatment of membrane concentrates generated from landfill leachate treatment processes. Separation and Purification Technology 259: 118182.

Khan Z and Farooqi R. 2011. Roughing filtration as an effective pre-treatment system for high turbidity water. Water Science Technology 64: 1419–427.

Massa D, Magan J J, Montesano F F and Tzortzakis N. 2020. Minimizing water and nutrient losses from soilless cropping in southern Europe. Agricultural Water Management 241: 106395.

Nkwonta O and Ochieng G. 2009. Roughing filter for water pre-treatment technology in developing countries: A review. International Journal of Physical Sciences 4: 455–63.

Ranjan P and Prem M. 2018. Schmutzdecke-A filtration layer of slow sand filter. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7(7): 637–45.

Savvas D, Gianquinto G, Tuzel Y and Gruda N. 2013. Soilless culture. Good Agricultural Practices for Greenhouse Vegetable Crops, pp. 303–54. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Schuler A J. 2019. Design and performance of slow sand filters. Water Environment Research 91(6): 539–49.

Sze Y S, Aris A, Zaidi N S and Bahrodin M B. 2021. Performance of sand filtration system with different sand bed depth for polishing wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 9(2): 452–57.

Verma S, Daverey A and Sharma A. 2017. Slow sand filtration for water and wastewater treatment: A review. Environmental Technology Reviews 6(1): 47–58.

Wang X, Wang L, Liu Y and Duan W. 2007. Ozonation pre- treatment for ultrafiltration of the secondary effluent. Journal of Membrane Science 287(2): 187–91.

Wohanka W. 1995 Disinfection of recirculating nutrient solution by slow sand filtration. Acta Horticulturae 382: 246–55.

Yang Q, Zhang F and Li A. 2011. Effect of different drip irrigation methods and fertilization on growth, physiology and water use of young apple tree. Science Horticulture 129: 119–26.

Zhu H, Wen X and Huang X. 2010. Membrane organic fouling and the effect of pre-ozonation in microfiltration of secondary effluent organic matter Journal of Membrane Science 352(1–2): 213–21.