Stability analysis in quality protein maize (Zea mays) by Eberhart and Russell model, and GGE biplots

SWAPNIL; KUMARI  RASHMI; SANJAY  SAHAY; S S  MANDAL; SWETA  SINHA; BIRENDER  SINGH; DIGVIJAY  SINGH; RABIYA  PARWEEN; ZAFAR  IMAM

doi:10.56093/ijas.v94i9.144431

Authors

SWAPNIL Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India
KUMARI RASHMI Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India
SANJAY SAHAY Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India
S S MANDAL Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India
SWETA SINHA Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India
BIRENDER SINGH Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India
DIGVIJAY SINGH Narayan Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Gopal Narayan Singh University, Sasaram, Bihar
RABIYA PARWEEN Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India
ZAFAR IMAM Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar 813 210, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i9.144431

Keywords:

Crosses, Eberhart and Russel model, Environment, GGE biplots, QPM, Stability

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) 2019–20, 2020–21 and rainy (kharif) season of 2021 at Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bihar to study the stability in Quality Protein Maize (QPM) (Zea mays L.). A total of 50 QPM inbred lines were screened during rabi 2019–20 out of which 14 inbred lines and 3 testers were selected as the promising genotypes. These lines and testers were hybridized to generate 42 crosses utilizing the line × tester fashion. The 61 genotypes (42 crossings, 14 lines, 3 testers and 2 checks) were assessed in three distinct environments viz. early kharif (sown on May 15), E₁; kharif (sown on June 30), E₂; and late kharif (sown on August 15), E₃ using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The data were recorded for 18 morphological and biochemical traits to draw conclusions on stability analysis using Eberhart and Russell model, and GGE biplots. The Eberhart and Russell model's estimations of stability study for grain yield showed that 7 hybrids, viz. L₅ × T₃, L6 × T2, L6 × T3, L7 × T1, L13 × T3, L14 × T1 and L14 × T2 were stable in a range of environmental circumstances. Similarly, using GGE biplots three hybrids (L5 × T3, L6 × T3 and L13 × T3) were found as the stable ones and the late kharif environment ranked the best for identifying the high-yielding genotypes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed A. 2020. Evaluating short stature and high yielding maize hybrids in multiple environments using GGE biplot and AMMI models. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 25(2): 216–26.

AOAC International. 2001. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th edn. AOAC International. Method 2001.11.

Bhartiya A, Aditya J P, Kumari V, Kishore N, Purwar J P, Agrawal A and Kant L. 2017. GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of yield stability in multi-environment trial of soybean genotypes under rainfed conditions of north-western Himalayan hills. The Journal of Animal and Plant Science 27(1): 227–38.

Hernandez H and Bates L S. 1969. A modified method for the determination of tryptophan in cereals and its application to sorghum grain. Cereal Chemistry 46(5): 206–11.

Hodge J E and Hofreiter B T. 1962. Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Whistler R L and Be Miller J N (Eds). Academic Press, New York, USA.

IIMR. 2020. Maize Scenario. https://iimr.icar.gov.in/?page_id=51 Kumar A and Singh K M. 2017. A study on maize production in samastipur (Bihar): An empirical analysis. Munich Personal

RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/80262/ Kumari H. 2018. ‘Study of combining ability and yield stability analysis in quality protein maize (Zea mays L.)’. PhD Thesis, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar.

Kumawat R, Dadheech A and Barupal H L. 2023. Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis in maize around southern Aravalli hilly ranges of Rajasthan. Journal of Plant Breeding 14(1): 189–97.

Kunwar C B, Katuwal R B, Thapa S and Shrestha J. 2016. Grain yield stability of early maize genotypes. Journal of Maize Research and Development 2(1): 94–99.

Leon N, Jannink J, Edwards J and Kaeppler S. 2016. Introduction to a special issue on genotype by environment interaction. Crop Science 56: 2081.10.2135/cropsci2016.07.0002in

Li H, Pordesimo L, Weiss J and Dunford N T. 2016. Ultrasound-assisted oil extraction: A review. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 35: 1–13.

Maniruzzaman M Z, Islam F, Begum M A, Khan A, Amiruzzaman M and Hossain A. 2019. Evaluation of yield stability of seven barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in multiple environments using GGE biplot and AMMI model. Open Agric 4(1): 284–93.

Mumtaz A, Hussain D, Saeed M, Arshad M and Yousaf M I. 2019. Stability and adaptability of sorghum hybrids elucidated with genotype-environment interaction biplots. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 24(2): 155–63.

Nyirenda H, Mwangomba W and Nyirenda E M. 2021. Delving into possible missing links for attainment of food security in Central Malawi: Farmers' perceptions and long-term dynamics in maize (Zea mays L.) production. Heliyon 7(5): e07130. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2021.e07130

Oliveira T R A, Carvalho H W L, Oliveira G H F, Costa E F N, Gravina G A, Santos R D and Filho J L S C. 2019. Hybrid maize selection through GGE biplot analysis. Bragantia, Campinas 78(2): 166–74.

Perera K T G K and Weerasinghe T K. 2014. A study on the impacts of corn cultivation [Zea mays (L.), Family-Poaceae] on the properties of soil. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication 4(7): 1–6. http://www.ijsrp.org/ research-paper-0714.php?rp=P312965

Pramitha J L, Joel J, Rajasekaran R, Uma D, Vinothana K, Balakrishnan M, Sathyasheela K R V, Muthurajan R and Hossain F. 2022. Stability analysis and heterotic studies in maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds to develop hybrids with low phytic acid and high-quality protein. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 781469. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.781469

Singh D, Kushwaha N, Swapnil, Parveen R, Mohanty T A, Suman S K, Kumar R, Kumar A and Singh M K. 2023. Assessment of quality protein maize (QPM) inbreds for genetic diversity using morphological characters and simple sequence repeats markers. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 14(3): 1276–84. https://doi.org/10.37992/2023.1403.145

Singh D, Mohanty T A, Kushwaha N, Kumar A, Kumar R, Singh M K and Swapnil. 2021. Assessment of genetic diversity in quality protein maize (QPM) inbreds using principal component analysis. The Pharma Innovation Journal 10(7): 1726–31.

Swapnil, Jayshreepriyanka R, Singh D and Mandal S S. 2021 Principal component analysis in maize (Zea mays L.) under normal sown condition of Bihar. The Pharma Innovation Journal 10(10): 641–44.

Wang J, Vanga S K, Saxena R, Orsat V and Raghavan V. 2018. Effect of climate change on the yield of cereal crops: A review. Climate 6(2): 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6020041

Yan W K, Kang M S, Ma B, Woods S and Cornelius P L. 2007. GGE biplot vs AMMI analysis of genotype-by environment data. Crop Science 47: 643–55.

Yan W and Hunt L A. 2002. Biplot analysis of multi environment trial data. Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding,

pp. 289–303. M S Kang (Ed). CABI Publishing, New York, USA.