Mutagenic-sensitivity and variability induction in garden rose (Rosa × hybrida)


469 / 289 / 82

Authors

  • HARENDRA YADAV ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • NAMITA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • M K SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • KANWAR PAL SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • BHUPINDER SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • SAPNA PANWAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • B N MANDAL ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • SUDHIR KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i7.149380

Keywords:

Gamma rays, In vivo mutagenesis, Pusa Virangana, Physical mutagens, Rose

Abstract

Mutation breeding is one of the most desirable breeding methods to enhance genetic variability and to improve economically important traits in ornamental crops. An induced mutation leading to altered phenotypes after a permanent heritable change in the structure of the genetic material is now established as a time saving and inexpensive approach for flower crop improvement. Gamma (γ)-irradiation induces changes in plant growth and flowering traits of flower crop plants. The present study was carried out during 2020–2022 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to induce the variability in rose (Rosa × hybrida L.) using gamma rays under in vivo conditions. Semi- hardwood cuttings of cv. Pusa Virangana were treated with gamma rays at different doses and it was observed that 100% cuttings were dried beyond 40 Gy doses of gamma rays. Gamma rays adversely affect plant growth (days to bud sprouting, plant height and internodal length. Maximum primary branches (6.0/plant) and plant spread (55.50 cm) were observed in 20 Gy treatment, however, leaf characters, viz. leaflet length and width and compound leaf area showed random effects. Leaflet apex margin found undulated type at 30 Gy comparisons to the other treatments and control. Flowering traits i.e. maximum flower stalk length (6.83 cm), number of flowers/plant (9.00), flower diameter (7.67 cm), number of petals/flower (30.00), petal size and single flower weight (5.09 g) were observed at 20 Gy of gamma rays. Two mutants were isolated from mutation population of cv. Pusa Virangana at 30 Gy (PVM-1) and 20 Gy (PVM-2) doses in in vivo mutagenesis. PVM-1 has bicolour, medium size, red purple group flower. PVM-2 has single colour, large size, red purple group flower, have greater number of petals and compact flower. Based on survival percentage after 30, 60 and 90 days of planting of cuttings, the lethal dose 50 (LD50) for gamma irradiation was determined using probit analysis values, which were 27.9, 16.2 and 11.2, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bajpayee A and Dwivedi D H. 2019. Gamma ray induced foliage variegation and anatomical aberrations in Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora T.) cv. Maghi. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8(4): 871–74.

Bala M and Singh K P. 2015. In vitro mutagenesis in rose (Rosa hybrida L.) cv. Raktima for novel traits. Indian Journal of Biotechnology 14: 525.

Bharti S, Verma L S and Sharma G L. 2021. Effect of different doses of gamma rays on mutational characters in dahlia (Dahlia variabilis L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal 10(3): 717–21.

Chawala S L, Ahlawat T R, Patel A I and Patil S. 2021. Induction of variability in chrysanthemum cv. Thai Chen Qween using different doses of gamma rays. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture 24(2): 96–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-880X.2021.00013.X

FAO/IAEA. 2023. Mutant variety database. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/mvd/SitePages/Search.aspx

Finney D J. 1978. Statistical Method in Biological Assay. Charles Griffin Co. Haspolat G. 2024. Variations in flower colour of mutant chrysanthemums. Horticulturae. 10: 385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040385

Hussain A and Khan M A. 2004. Effect of growth regulators on stem cutting of Rosa bourboniana and Rosa gruss-an-teplitz. Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6: 931–32.

Kapadiya D B, Chawla S L, Patel A I and Bhatt D. 2016. Induction of variability through in vivo mutagenesis in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) var. Jaya. Indian Journal of Horticulture 73:141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2016.00035.9

Kim S W, Lee H J, Kim Y S, Jo Y D, Ryu J H, Kang S Y and Kim S H. 2017. Effect of gamma-ray on survival and mutation rates of rooted cuttings and unrooted cuttings in rose. Korean Journal of Breeding Science 49(3): 150–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2017.49.3.150

Kumar S, Prasad K V and Choudhary M L. 2006. Detection of genetic variability among chrysanthemum radio mutants using RAPD markers. Current Science 90: 1108–13.

Lowe J M, Davey M R, Pown J B and Blundy K S. 1993. A study of some factors affecting Agrobacterium transformation and plant regeneration of Dendranthema grandifloraTzvelev (Syn. Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 33: 171–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01983231

Mol J N M, Stuitje A R and Van der Krol A. 1989. Genetic manipulation of floral pigmentation genes. Plant Molecular Biology 13: 287–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025316

Namita, Raju D V S, Prasad K V, Singh K P and Kumar S. 2015. Standardization of protocol for in vitro multiplication of rose (Rosa × hybrida L.) cv. Happiness. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85(11): 1513–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i11.53763

Pal S, Kumar A, Chaturvedi P, Srivastava R and Tripathi S. 2017. Determination of lethal dose for gamma rays induced mutagenesis in different cultivars of dahlia. Journal of Hill Agriculture 8(3): 279–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7338.2017.00055.6

Setia M K, Bala M and Singh S. 2020. Induction of novel inflorescence traits in Chrysanthemum through 60Co gamma irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 96(10): 1309–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1793023

Singh M and Bala M. 2019. Induction of radio mutants in Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Gul-e-Sahir for novel traits. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 57: 520–54.

Singh D, Bala M and Sharma A. 2023. Induced mutations in chrysanthemum through gamma rays. Indian Journal of Horticulture 80(3): 258–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2023.80.3.5

Tiwari A K and Kumar V. 2011. Gamma rays induced morphological changes in pot marigold (Calendula officinalis). Progressive Agriculture in Arizona 1: 99–102.

Wang L W, Jianhui L F and Gao P. 2020. Morphological, cytological and molecular variations induced by gamma rays in Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Donglinruixue’. Folia Horticulturae 32(1): 87–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2020-0009

Wenquan Q, Zhenwei J, Yaqin W, Biao Y, Bin L, Yanhong H and Hongsheng G. 2020. Radiation effects of 60Co-γ ray on the cutting seedlings of nine garden rose. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences 34(4): 681–90.

Yadav H, Namita, Singh M K, Singh K P, Panwar S, Singh B, Kumar S and Mandal B N. 2023. Optimization of in vitro protocol for rapid mass multiplication of floribunda rose cv. ‘Rose Sherbet’. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia 54(9): 15781–88.

Yamaguchi H, Shimizu A, Hase Y, Tanaka A, Shikazono N, Degi T and Morishita T. 2010. Effects of ion beam irradiation on mutation induction and nuclear DNA content in chrysanthemum. Breeding Science 60: 398–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.60.398

Submitted

2024-03-08

Published

2025-07-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

YADAV, H. ., NAMITA, SINGH, M. K. ., SINGH, K. P. ., SINGH, B. ., PANWAR, S. ., MANDAL, B. N. ., & KUMAR, S. . (2025). Mutagenic-sensitivity and variability induction in garden rose (Rosa × hybrida). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 95(7), 760–765. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i7.149380
Citation