Global biopesticide research trends: a bibliometric assessment


373 / 106

Authors

  • BIKRAMJIT SINHA National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies (CSIR), New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i2.15251

Keywords:

Agriculture, Bacillus thuringiensis, Biological control, Biopesticides, Botanical pesticides, Environment

Abstract

Combined realization of the negative effects of chemical pesticides and the positive attributes of biopesticide led to intensive research programmes on the later by both public and private institutions across nations. This has generated a knowledge pool and accumulated vast scientific literature. This paper tries to capture the nature of basic research in biopesticide and growth of the discipline during the last four decades. Bibliometric methods such as analysis of title-word and author keywords have been used to capture direction of research and to identify thrust areas of research. Growth of biopesticide research output has been encouraging, particularly since 1996. Microbial pesticides, particularly Bacillus thuringiensis-related research has dominated the discipline so far. The paper also identifies the leading institutes, countries, and the nature of inter-country as well as inter-institutional collaboration. As in most other disciplines of science, United States had an upper hand in biopesticide research, followed distantly by India. Two aspects that need immediate attention are the decline in participation of industry and international collaboration in biopesticide research, both of which are critical for developing cost-effective and environment-friendly pesticides having world-wide application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BCC (Business Communications Company Inc). 2010. Biopesticides: The Global Market. BCC Research Report No. CHM029C. http://www.bccresearch.com/Accessed 10 May 2010. Bradford S C. 1985. Sources of information on specific subjects.

Journal of Information Sciences 10 (4): 173–80.

Bravo A, Likitvivatanavong S, Gill S S and Soberón M. 2011. Bacillus thuringiensis: A story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 41 (7): 423–31.

Carson R. 1962. Silent Spring, 400pp. Houghton Miffin, United States Chunag K Y, Huang Y L and Ho Y S. 2007. A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan. Scientometrics 72: 201–12.

de Faria M R Wraight S P. 2007. Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides: a comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biological Control 43: 237–56

Garfield E. 1970. Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 227: 669–71.

Garfield E. 1990. KeyWords Plus, ISI?s breakthrough retrieval method. Part 1. Expanding your searching power on current contents on diskette. Current Contents 32: 5–9.

Koul O, and Dhaliwal G S. 2001. Phytochemical Biopesticides: Advances in Biopesticide Research, 236pp. Taylor and Francis, London.

Koul O and Dhaliwal G S. 2002. Microbial Biopesticides: Advances in Biopesticide Research, 352pp. Taylor and Francis, London. Lerner I. 2005. Biopesticides growing strong. Chemical Market Reporter 20: 26–7.

Margni M, Rossiser D, Crettaz P and Jolliet O. 2002. Life cycle impact assessment of pesticides on human health and ecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 93: 79–92.

Palmer A L, Sese A and Montano J J. 2005. Tourism and statistics– Bibliometric study 1998–2002. Annals of Tourism Research 32: 167–78.

Pimentel D. 1996. Green revolution agriculture and chemical hazards. Science of the Total Environment 188: 86–98.

Rodgers P B. 2006. Potential of biopesticides in agriculture. Pest Management Science 39 (2): 117-29.

Rossel G, Quero C, Coll J and Guerrero A. 2008. Biorational insecticides in pest management. Journal of Pesticide Science 332: 103–21.

Rothman H and, Lester G. 1985. The use of bibliometric indicators in the study of insecticide research. Scientometrics 8: 247–62.

Schubert A and, Braun T. 1990. International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics 19: 3–10.

Takeda Y, Mae S, Kajikawa Y and, Matsushima K. 2009. Nanotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology, a bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 80: 23– 38.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). What are biopesticides? (available at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/whatarebiopesticides.htm).

Xie S, Zhang J and, Ho Y S. 2008 Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 77: 113– 30.

Zitt M and, Bassecoulard E. 2006. Delineating complex scientific fields by a hybrid lexical-citation method, an application to nanosciences. Information Process Management 42: 1513–31.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-02-06

Published

2012-02-07

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

SINHA, B. (2012). Global biopesticide research trends: a bibliometric assessment. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i2.15251
Citation