Influence of irrigation methods and fertilizer levels on productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum)


186 / 124

Authors

  • VIPIN SHARMA Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230
  • I P SHARMA Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230
  • R S SPEHIA Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230
  • Pardeep Kumar Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Himachal Pradesh 173 230

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i2.15276

Keywords:

Benefit, cost ratio, Drip, Field capacity, Hydrothermal regimes, Split-plot design, Sprinkler

Abstract

A experiment was laid in split-plot design and the treatments comprised sprinkler, drip and furrow irrigation as main plot along with three doses of fertilizers, viz F1 (NPK @ 150:150:125 kg/ha), F2 (NPK @ 125:125:100 kg/ha) and F3 (NPK @ 100:100:75 kg/ha) as sub-plot treatments. Results of the study indicated that irrigation methods manipulated the hydrothermal regimes of the soil comprehensively and mean maximum monthly temperature was lowered by about 1.2oC under sprinkler irrigation. Under drip irrigation, moisture was near to the field capacity throughout the growth period, whereas, in conventional furrow irrigation, the moisture status curve traveled from above field capacity to 50% moisture depletion conditions. The yield of tubers was appreciably higher under sprinkler and drip, compared to furrow irrigation method. F1 and F2 exhibited non significant differences among themselves, in respect of tuber yield, but were significantly higher than F3. Economic analysis indicated that sprinkler irrigation and F2 resulted in optimum benefit: cost ratio.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahire N R, Bhoi P G and Solanke A V. 2000. Effect of row spacing and planting system on growth and yield of potato under surface and drip irrigation. Journal of Indian Potato Association 27(2): 59–60.

Bhalerao V P, More N B, Patil A V and Bhoi P G. 2001. Substitution of inorganic fertilizers by organics for sustaining sugarcane production and soil health. Indian Sugar 56(6): 37–44.

Bhowmik K N and Dandpat A. 1991. Studies on yield parameters and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars under varying levels of Nitrogen. Indian Agriculturist 35(1): 21–6.

Datt N, Sharma R P and Rana M C. 2002. Balanced fertilization and manuring of sprinkler irrigated potatoes in Lahaul valley of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Indian Potato Association. 29(1– 2): 47–50.

Gattani P D, Jain S V and Seth S P. 1976. Effect of continuous use of chemical fertilizer and manures on soil physical and chemical properties. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 24: 284–9.

Gayathri A, Vadivel A, Santhi R and P Murugesa Boopathi. 2008. Yield, response and nutrient uptake by potato as influenced by soil fertility and integrated plant nutrition system on Ultisols. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 42 (4): 303–6.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, 3rd edn. 680pp. John Willey and Sons.

Grewal S S and Singh N T. 1978. The effect of different moisture regimes on soil temperature and yield and quality of potatoes in Northern India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 23(2): 130–6.

Kohl R A. 1973. Sprinkler induced soil temperature changes under plant cover. Agronomy Journal 65: 962–4.

Pawar D D, Bhoi P G and Shinde S H. 2002. Effect of irrigation methods and fertilizer levels on yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 72(2): 80–2.

Saggu S and Kaushal M P. 1992. Comparison of drip and furrow irrigation systems for potato crop. Journal of Research Punjab Agricultural University 29(1): 91–8.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-02-06

Published

2012-02-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SHARMA, V., SHARMA, I. P., SPEHIA, R. S., & Kumar, P. (2012). Influence of irrigation methods and fertilizer levels on productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(2), 117–21. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i2.15276
Citation