Study on the effect of different rootstocks on cane biochemical composition in grape varieties

N A  DESHMUKH; S D  GAT; S R  TAKALE; S R  SINHASANE; P H  NIKUMBHE; R G  SOMKUWAR

doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i6.153549

Authors

N A DESHMUKH ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra 412 307, India
S D GAT ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra 412 307, India
S R TAKALE ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra 412 307, India
S R SINHASANE ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra 412 307, India
P H NIKUMBHE ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra 412 307, India
R G SOMKUWAR ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra 412 307, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i6.153549

Keywords:

Biochemical, Cane, Fruitfulness, Grapevine, Rootstock, Yield

Abstract

The present investigation aimed to study the effect of different rootstocks, viz. Dogridge (V. champini), 110R (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), 140RU (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris), and 1103P (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris) on cane biochemical composition, yield and berry quality of new grape varieties. viz. Manjari Medika, Manjari Naveen, Manjari Kishmish along with Thompson Seedless. Experiment was conducted at ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra, during the year 2022–23 and 2023–24. Results showed that cane biochemical content varied significantly among the different rootstock-variety combinations influencing the grapevine fruitfulness, yield and berry quality. Among the rootstock variety combinations, grape variety Manjari Medika grafted on 140RU rootstock exhibited highest levels of carbohydrate (108.05 mg/g), proline (5.07 µmoles/g), and protein (5.90 mg/g) content. However, Manjari Naveen grafted on 110R showed the highest tannin (5.71 mg/g) and phenol (4.43 mg/g) content. Similarly, Manjari Medika × 140RU rootstock exhibit highest fruitfulness (95.74%), yield/vine (18.47 kg) with optimum berry quality, while lowest fruitfulness was recorded in Thompson Seedless × 1103P (81.13%) and minimum yield/vine in Manjari Naveen × Dogridge (8.46 kg), respectively. The study identified a notable linear correlation between yield per vine and cane biochemical, viz. carbohydrates, phenol, tannin, proline and protein. Further, Manjari Medika × 140RU is suggested as promising rootstock-variety combinations for quality grape production at tropical climate of India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2022. Area and Production of Horticulture Crops (2021–22). National Horticulture Board. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, India.

APEDA. 2023. https://apeda.gov.in/apedawebsite/SubHead_Products/Grapes.html

Bates L S, Waldren R PA and Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–07.

Burcova Z, Kreps F, Schmidt S, Strizincova P, Jablonsky M, Kyselka J, Haz A and Surina I. 2019. Antioxidant activity and the tocopherol and phenol contents of grape residues. BioResources 14(2): 4146–56.

Hasler G S, Sommerauer L, Schnabel T, Oostingh G J and Schuster A. 2023. Antioxidative and antimicrobial evaluation of bark extracts from common European trees in light of dermal applications. Antibiotics 12(1): 130.

Hedge J E and Hofreiter B T. 1962. Carbohydrate Chemistry, Vol. 17. Whistler R L and Be Miller J N (Eds), Academic Press, New York.

Jogaiah S, Porika H and Upreti K. 2021. Biochemical and histological basis of graft compatibility in Red Globe grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) grafted on different rootstocks. Modern Concepts and Developments in Agronomy 9(2): 896–901.

Kose B and Celik H. 2017. Phenological changes of shoot carbohydrates and plant growth characteristics in Vitis Labrusca

L. grape. Journal of Polymer Science 61(1): 257–68.

Leao P C D S and Oliveira C R S D. 2023. Agronomic performance of table grape cultivars affected by rootstocks in semi-arid conditions. Bragantia 82: 20220176.

Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L and Randall R J. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193(1): 265–75.

Naik S, Tiwari J, Singh B and Sharma D P. 2023. Biochemical attributes of grapes grown at high elevations in Himachal Pradesh. Grape Insight 1(1): 23–31.

Nemeth G, Molnar Z, Podmaniczky P, Nyitrai-Sardy D, Kallay M, Dunai A and Kocsis L. 2017. Trans-resveratrol content in grape cane and root of different variety-rootstock combinations. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 67: 256–64.

Nuzzo V and Matthews M A. 2005. Berry size and yield paradigms on grapes and wines quality. (In) International Workshop on Advances in Grapevine and Wine Research 754: 423–36.

Peiretti P G and Tassone S. 2020. Nutritive value of leaves and pruning residues of red and white grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties. Grapevines at a Glance, pp. 111–26. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York, USA.

Popova A. 2021. Influence of the biochemical composition of vine canes on cold resistance of buds in different ʻSyrahʼ clones. Scientific Papers Series B, Horticulture 1: 328–33.

Raitanen J E, Jarvenpaa E, Korpinen R, Makinen S, Hellstrom J, Kilpelainen P, Liimatainen J, Ora A, Tupasela T and Jyske T. 2020. Tannins of conifer bark as nordic piquancy-sustainable preservative and aroma. Molecules 25(3): 567.

Romero P, Botia P and Navarro J M. 2018. Selecting rootstocks to improve vine performance and vineyard sustainability in deficit irrigated monastrell grapevines under semiarid conditions. Agricultural Water Management 209: 73–93.

Satisha J, Ramteke S D and Karibasappa G S. 2007. Physiological and biochemical characterization of grape rootstocks. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 28: 163–68.

Singleton V L and Rossi J A. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American journal of Enology and Viticulture 16(3): 144–58.

Somkuwar R G, Thutte A S, Upadhyay A K, Deshmukh N A and Sharma A K. 2024. Rootstock influences photosynthetic activity, yield, and berry quality in Manjari Naveen grape. Indian Journal of Horticulture 81(1): 43–47.

Squillaci G, Zannella C, Carbone V, Minasi P, Folliero V, Stelitano D, Cara F L, Galdiero M, Franci G and Morana A. 2021. Grape canes from typical cultivars of campania (southern Italy) as a source of high-value bioactive compounds: Phenolic profile, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Molecules 26(9): 2746.

Toolo K B. 2022. ‘Effect of post-harvest summer pruning on carbohydrate reserve status, bud break and fertility of Sultanina H5 in the lower orange river region’. Phd Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch.

Vuerich M. 2022. Vitis vinifera and drought stress: Physiological and anatomical responses. Anno Accademico 4: 34.