Development of pest management modules and their economic evaluation for legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) incowpea (Vigna unguiculata)
339 / 232
Keywords:
Cowpea, Economics, IPM, Maruca vitrata, Pod borerAbstract
Legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) is a major constraint in production of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in India. A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) season of 2021–22 and 2022–23 at ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Regional Research Station, Dharwad, Karnataka to evaluate different pest management modules, viz. bio-intensive, integrated and chemical module including an untreated control against legume pod borer in cowpea. All the pest management modules were found to be significantly superior over control in terms of pest reduction. Based on pooled average data of two-year study, integrated module comprising sequential spray of chlorantraniliprole 18.5 sc @0.5 mL/L, followed by botanical insecticide, azadirachtin 0.15% @4 mL/L and biorational insecticide, emamectin benzoate 5 g @0.5 g/L at 50% flowering at 10 days interval, was found effective with lowest pod damage of 11.88% and gave 65.97% protection over untreated control. Highest grain yield (1191.73 kg/ha) with 83.19% increase over untreated control, high benefit:cost ratio (1:2.05) and incremental benefit:cost ratio (2.64) were obtained in integrated module. This module reduced the grain yield loss to the extent of 45.41% whereas, the bio-intensive module and chemical module reduced the loss of grain yield up to 28.25 and 27.45%, respectively from pod borer damage. Thus, integrated module developed may be adopted to reduce the damage by pod borer in cowpea.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2022. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance, pp. 280. Economics and Statistics Division, Department of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi. https://agriwelfare.gov.in/Documents/CWWGDATA/Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_ Glance_2022_0.pdf
Anonymous. 2024. Project Coordinators Report 2023–24, pp. 135. All India Coordinated Research Project on Kharif Pulses, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh.
Banerjee A and Pal S. 2023. Evaluation of different integrated pest management modules against major pests of field pea. Journal of Crop and Weed 19: 89–96.
Halder J, Kodandaram M H, Rai A B and Kumar R. 2016. Impact of different pest management modules against the major sucking pests complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86: 792–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i6.58983
Kodandaram M H, Rai A B and Halder J. 2010. Novel insecticides for management of insect pests in vegetable crops: A review. Vegetable Science 37(2): 109–23.
Kodandaram M H, Divekar P A, Wangi N, Mohite N R and Rai A B. 2024. Optimising sucking pest control in okra: An analysis of flupyradifurone 200 SL effectiveness, phytotoxicity, safety to natural enemies, pollinators and cost-efficiency. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 131(3): 757–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00885-2
Lahm G P, Stevenson T M, Selby T P, Freudenberger J H, Dubas C M, Smith B K, Cordova D, Flexner L, Clark C E, Bellin C A and Hollingshaus J G. 2007. RynaxypyrTM : A new insecticidal anthranilic diamide that acts as a potent and selective ryanodine receptor activator. (In) Pesticide Chemistry: Crop Protection, Public Health, Environmental Safety, pp. 111–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527611249.ch11
Ohkawa H, Miyagawa H and Lee P W (Eds). John Wiley and Sons, Weinheim.
Lamani K. 2013. ‘Studies on integrated nutrient management on seed yield and quality of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]’. PhD Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka.
Malathi S, Bhaskar A V, Padmaja B and Rao P J M. 2020. Validation of integrated pest management module against major insect pests of pigeonpea, [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 9(4): 1241–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i4q.11921
Maurya R P, Agnihotri M, Tiwari S and Yadav L B. 2017. Validation of integrated pest management module against insect pests of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan in Tarai region of Uttarakhand. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 9(2): 1077–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i2.1324
Ogunwolu E O. 1999. Damage to cowpea by the legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis Geyer, as influenced by infestation density in Nigeria. Tropical Pest Management 36(2): 138–40. Ohno K and Alam M Z. 1989. Ecological studies on cowpea borers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670879009371457
I. evaluation of yield loss of cowpea due to the pod borers. (In) Annual Research Review, Institute of Postgraduate Studies in Agriculture, Gazipur, Bangladesh, 29 June.
Pandey S N, Singh R, Sharma V K and Kanwat P W. 1991. Losses due to insect pests in some kharif pulses. Indian Journal of Entomology 53(4): 629–31.
Patel R M, Patel H C and Mohapatra A R. 2023. Evaluation of different insecticides against spotted pod borer, M. vitrata infesting vegetable cowpea. Environment and Ecology 41(4A): 2516–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60151/envec/TXFI3792
Pradeeprao L K and Kumar A. 2024. Efficacy and economics of selected insecticides against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.) in cowpea. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 36(7): 404–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74746
Preethi S, Ragumoorthi K N, Vinothkumar B, Balasubramani V and Kumaresan D. 2022. Development and validation of integrated pest management modules against spotted pod borer Maruca vitrata Fabricius on garden bean Lablab purpureus var. typicus (L.). Journal of Applied and Natural Science 14(4): 1308–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v14i4.3905
Rai A B, Loganathan M, Halder J, Venkataravanappa V and Naik P S. 2014. Eco-friendly Approaches for Sustainable Management of Vegetable Pests, pp. 104. Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi.
Sasmal A, Kar A, Mishra I O P and Kumar S. 2018. Evaluation of IPM modules for management of sucking and borer insect pest complex of mungbean in Odisha. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 46(1): 32–35.
Sharma H C. 1998. Bionomics, host plant resistance and management of legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata- A review. Crop Protection 17: 373–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(98)00045-3
Sheoran O P, Tonk D S, Kaushik L S, Hasija R C and Pannu R S. 1998. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. (In) Hooda D S and Hasija R C (Eds), Recent Advances in Information Theory, Statistics and Computer Applications, pp. 139–43.
Department of Mathematics Statistics, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana.
Singh S R and Allen D J. 1980. Pests, diseases, resistance and protection in cowpea. (In) Advances in Legume Science, pp. 419–43. Summer Field R J and Bunting A J (Eds). Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, UK.
Singh S R and Jackai L E N. 1988. The legume pod-borer, Maruca testulalis (Geyer): Past, present and future research. Insect Science and its Application 9: l–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400009930
Tripathi K, Gore P G, Ahlawat S P, Tyagi V, Semwal D P, Gautam N K, Rana J C and Kumar A. 2019. Cowpea genetic resources and its utilisation: Indian perspective- A review. Legume Research- An International Journal 42(4): 437–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4146
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.