Nutrient uptake, osmolytes and antioxidant potential of different citrus rootstocks subjected to acidic soils


150 / 130

Authors

  • NONGTHOMBAM DEVACHANDRA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • O P AWASTHI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • V K SHARMA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • RAKESH PANDEY ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • JAI PRAKASH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml
  • KRIPA SHANKAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i1.155054

Keywords:

Acidic soils, Antioxidants, Citrus, Macro nutrients, Osmolytes, Rootstocks

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted during 2021–23 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to evaluate the response of five citrus rootstocks, viz. Rangpur lime (RL); Troyer citrange (TC); Cleopatra mandarin (CM); X-639 and Jatti khatti (JK) for leaf and root nutrient content including osmolytes and antioxidant potential in a soil pH range of 3.8–7.5. The experiment was initiated after the final establishment of plants in the pots in a factorial completely randomized block design (Factorial-CRBD) with four levels of soil pH and five different citrus rootstocks. Result indicated that RL recorded highest phosphorous content in leaf (0.43%) and root (0.36%) as well as total soluble sugars content (9.34 mg/g) in leaf. TC registered highest content of nitrogen (1.83%) and phosphorous (0.35%) in root; potassium (1.83 and 1.89%) and calcium (1.10 and 0.94%) in leaf and root, respectively, while significantly higher magnesium content (0.77%) and soluble protein (5.67 mg/g) were documented in the leaf as compared to other rootstocks. Maximum nitrogen content (3.10%), total phenols (6.76 GAE mg/g) and proline (40.27 μmol/g) were registered in leaves of CM whereas magnesium content in root (1.05%). The nitrogen content in leaves and roots of all the rootstocks as well as total soluble sugar tended to increase with decreasing levels of soil pH. Principal component analysis identified a distinct cluster of rootstocks comprising TC, X-639 and JK grouped together with notably high phenolic levels, while RL formed a separate cluster characterized by higher concentrations of total soluble sugar, proline and phosphorus. Thus, the present study demonstrated that citrus rootstocks prefer relatively lower soil pH for optimal growth. Among the investigated rootstocks, RL has demonstrated the ability to tolerate higher acidic soil conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad N, Hussain S, Ali M A, Minhas A, Waheed W, Danish S and Datta R. 2022. Correlation of soil characteristics and citrus leaf nutrients contents in current scenario of Layyah District. Horticulturae 8(1): 61.

Alva A K, Mattos Jr D, Paramasivam S, Patil B, Dou H and Sajwan K S. 2006. Potassium management for optimizing citrus production and quality. International Journal of Fruit Science 6(1): 3–43.

Anonymous. 2023. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2022. Area and Production of Horticulture Crops. Government of India. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Economics and Statistics Division: 92.

Argamasilla R, Gomez-Cadenas A and Arbona V. 2014. Metabolic and regulatory responses in citrus rootstocks in response to adverse environmental conditions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 33: 169–80.

Balal R M, Ashraf M Y, Khan M M, Jaskani M J and Ashfaq M. 2011. Influence of salt stress on growth and biochemical parameters of citrus rootstocks. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(4): 2135–41.

Bates L S, Waldren R PA and Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–07.

Bradford M M. 1976. Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein- dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248–54. https://doi. org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999

Davies F S and Albrigo L G. 1994. Plant husbandry. Citrus, pp. 108–62. CAB International, Walingford, UK.

FAO. 2024. Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations. Accessed 11 July 2024 from http://www.fao.org/ faostat/en/#data

Hartemink A E and Barrow N J. 2023. Soil pH-nutrient relationships: The diagram. Plant and Soil 486(1–2): 209–15.

Hawkesford M J, Cakmak I, Coskun D, De-Kok L J, HaLambers J H, Schjoerring J K and White P J. 2023. Functions of macronutrients. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Plants. 4th edn, pp. 201–82. Academic Press, London.

Hussain S, Khalid M F, Saqib M, Ahmad S, Zafar W, Rao M J and Anjum M A. 2018. Drought tolerance in citrus rootstocks is associated with better antioxidant defense mechanism. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 40: 1–10.

Ikram M, Raja N I, Mashwani Z U R, Omar A A, Mohamed A H, Satti S H and Zohra E. 2022. Phytogenic selenium nanoparticles elicited the physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant defense system amelioration of Huanglongbing-infected ‘Kinnow’ mandarin plants. Nanomaterials 12(3): 356.

Jackson M L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Kumar S, Awasthi O P, Dubey A K, Pandey R, Sharma V K, Mishra A K and Sharma R M. 2017. Root morphology and the effect of rootstocks on leaf nutrient acquisition of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis Loureiro × Citrus reticulata Blanco). Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2017.1345333

Li B, Wang S, Zhang Y and Qiu D. 2020. Acid soil improvement enhances disease tolerance in citrus infected by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(10): 3614.

Malik E P and Singh M B. 1980. Plant Enzymology and Histo-enzymology, 1st edn, pp. 286. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

Mandal D K, Mandal C, Prasad J and Bhattacharyya T. 2019. Acid soils in agro-ecological sub-regions of India: A revisit. Indian Journal of Fertilizers 15(10): 1156–66.

Mattos D J, Kadyampakeni D M, Oliver A Q, Boaretto R M, Morgan K T and Quaggio J A. 2020. Soil and nutrition interactions. The Genus Citrus, pp. 311–331. Talon M, Caruso M and Gmitter F G (Eds). Elsevier’s Woodhead Publishing Duxford, UK.

Mimura T and Reid R. 2024. Phosphate environment and phosphate uptake studies: Past and future. Journal of Plant Research 137(3): 307–14.

Morales-Alfaro J, Bermejo A, Navarro P, Quinones A and Salvador A. 2021. Effect of rootstock on citrus fruit quality: A review. Food Reviews International 39(5): 2835–53.

Morkunas I and Ratajczak L. 2014. The role of sugar signaling in plant defense responses against fungal pathogens. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 36 B: 1607–19.

Piper C S. 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publication, Bombay, India.

Sarkar A K. 2015. Soil acidity and liming. Soil Science: An Introduction, pp: 329–52. R K Rattan, J C Katyal, B S Dwivedi, A K Sarkar, T Bhattacharya, J C Tarafdar and S S Kukal (Eds). Indian Society of Soil Science, National Agricultural Science Centre Complex, New Delhi, India.

Shankar K, Awasthi O P, Dubey A K, Singh A, Prakash J and Dolatabadian A. 2023. Rootstock mediated alteration in morphology and photosystem in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) cv. Pusa Sharad under NaCl stress. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 93(10): 1103–07.

Sureshkumar P and Sandeep S. 2015. Secondary nutrients in soils and their management. Soil Science: An Introduction, pp. 601–22. R K Rattan, J C Katyal, B S Dwivedi; A K Sarkar, T Bhattacharya, J C Tarafdar and S S Kukal (Eds). Indian Society of Soil Science, NASC Complex, New Delhi.

Thimmaiah S K. 2021. Carbohydrates-Methods of biochemical analysis. Standard Methods of Biochemical Analysis, pp. 53–83. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Tripathi P C. 2024. Propagation and rootstocks. Coorg Mandarin, pp. 25–42. Akinik Publications, New Delhi, India.

Tucker B B and Kurtz L T. 1961. Calcium and magnesium determinations by EDTA titrations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 25(1): 27–29.

Zang Y, Huang Y, Chang X, Chen J, Jiang T, Wu Z and Tian S. 2023. High soil pH and plastic-shed lead to iron deficiency and chlorosis of citrus in coastal saline–alkali lands: A field study in Xiangshan country. Horticulturae 9(4): 437.

Zhang H, Li X Y, Chen L S and Huang Z R. 2020. The photosynthetic performance of two Citrus species under long- term aluminum treatment. Photosynthetica 58(SI): 228–35. Doi:10.32615/ps.2019:145

Zhu S, Nong J, Luo G, Li Q, Wang F, Jiang D and Zhao X. 2021. Varied tolerance and different responses of five citrus rootstocks to acid stress by principal component analysis and orthogonal analysis. Scientia Horticulturae 278: 109853.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-08-13

Published

2025-02-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DEVACHANDRA, N. ., AWASTHI, O. P. ., SHARMA, V. K. ., PANDEY, R. ., PRAKASH, J. ., & SHANKAR, K. . (2025). Nutrient uptake, osmolytes and antioxidant potential of different citrus rootstocks subjected to acidic soils. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 95(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i1.155054
Citation