Assessment of G × E interactions using AMMI, GGE biplot and stability analysis in blackgram (Vigna mungo)

SHANTHI P; GUNASEKARAN M; MANIVANNAN N; SASSIKUMAR D; UMADEVI M

doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i7.155064

Authors

SHANTHI P Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
GUNASEKARAN M Agricultural College and Research Institute (Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu), Madurai, Tamil Nadu
MANIVANNAN N Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
SASSIKUMAR D Sugarcane Research Station, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu
UMADEVI M Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i7.155064

Keywords:

AMMI, Blackgram, GGE biplot, G × E interaction, Grain yield, Stability

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) 2020, winter (rabi) 2020–21, summer 2021, rainy (kharif) 2021 and winter (rabi) 2021–22 at National Pulses Research Station, Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu to assess the stability over environments, G×E interaction through Finlay-Wilkinson, Eberhart and Russell model, AMMI analysis and GGE biplot model for grain yield using 20 blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.)] genotypes in five consecutive seasons with climatic variations. Based on stability analysis the genotypes, viz. VBG17021, VBG17030, VBG18034 and VBN 8 were identified as more stable genotypes across environments with high yielding. In the AMMI model G×E interaction analysis disclosed that a total of 93.7% of interaction was contributed by the first three principal components viz. IPCA1, IPCA2, and IPCA3. The genotypes VBG18048 (G5), VBG17026 (G14), VBG18034 (G18) and VBG18032 (G₁₁) were recorded the IPCA1 values close to zero suggested that these were more stable across environments. The yield of these genotypes were also better than the best check variety VBN8. The genotypes, such as VBG18032 (G₁₇) and VBG18040 (G₂₀) had high positive IPCA1 values showed a positive interaction with the particular environments (E₂). Therefore, these genotypes can be recommended for the favourable environment E₂ (kharif 2020), whereas the genotypes VBG18043 (G₃) and VBG18047 (G₄) can be recommended for another favourable environments E₃ and E₅ (rabi 2020 and 2021). The results of AMMI biplot 1 and 2 and GGE biplot analysis, determined that VBG 18043 (G₃) was more stable genotype coupled with high yielding across seasons. The “which- won- where” model of GGE biplot analysis showed that the genotypes VBG18048 (G₅) and VBG18034 (G₁₈) were highly suitable for the kharif and rabi seasons and VBG17030 (G₁₆) was suitable for summer season. The analysis of all four models of G×E interaction clearly indicated that the genotype VBG18034 was identified as more stable in all the five environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agricultural Statistics Division, Directorate of Economics and Statistics aand Ministry of Agrictulture and Farmer's Welfare. 2022.

Alwala S, Kwolek T, Mc Pherson M, Pellow J and Meyer. D. 2010. A comprehensive comparison between Eberhart and Russell joint regression and GGE biplot analyses to identify stable and high yielding maize hybrids. Field Crops Research 119: 225–30.

Dhasarathan M, Geetha S, Karthikeyan A, Sassikumar D and Meenkshiganeshan N. 2021. Development of novel blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] mutants and deciphering genotype × environment interaction for yield-related traits of mutants. Agronomy 11(7): 1287.

Eberhart S A and Russell W A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6: 36–40.

Finlay K W and Wilkinson G N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 742–54.

Gurmu F, Lire E, Asfaw A, Alemayehu F, Rezene Y and Ambachew D. 2012. GGE-biplot analysis of grain yield of fababean genotypes in southern Ethiopia. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 3(3): 898–907.

Konda C, Salimath P and Mishra M. 2009. Genotype and environment interaction for yield and its components in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Research International Journal 32: 195–98.

Kumawat R, Kumar S, Dogra S and Padha R. 2023. Joint regression analysis of variance for seed yield and its attributing traits by Eberhart and Russell (1966) Model in blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) under rainfed conditions of NW Himalaya’s. Acta Scientific Agriculture 13: 39–49

Manivannan N, Mahalingam A, Bharathikumar K and Rajalakshmi K. 2023. Stability analyses using regression and AMMI models for seed yield in blackgram. Legume Research 46(2): 146–53.

Mohanlal V A, Saravanan K and Sabesan T. 2023. Application of principal component analysis (PCA) for blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] germplasm evaluation under normal and water stressed conditions. Legume Research 46(9): 1134–40.

Njoroge J N and Oyoo M E. 2020. Stability and adaptability of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] genotypes for yield, protein and oil content using AMMI analysis in Kenya. Agricultural Sciences Digest 40(2): 122–28.

Patel K V, Parmar D J, Adsul H R, Vikas Pali, Makani A Y and Parmar H C. 2022. Assessment of Genotypes × Environment interaction of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] using multivariate analysis. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 34(23): 471–77.

Plant Breeding Tools (PB Tools). Version: 1.3. (c) Copyright International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) 2013–2020. http:// bbi.irri.org.

Rajalakshmi K, Murugan E, Anand G, Renuka R and Ramamoorthy V. 2024. Study on blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] genotypes for yield stability and Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) resistance. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 15(1): 147–54.

Rajalakshmi K, Manivannan N, Anand G, Vanniarajan C and Harish S. 2021. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of seed yield and batter quality Traits in Blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Research. DOI: 10.18805/LR-4574

Raman R B and Sinhamahapa S P. 2012. Stability analysis of blackgram [Vigna Mungo (L.) Hepper] in summer season. Journal of Crop and Weed 8(1): 111–13.

Revanappa S B, Kamannavar P Y, Vijayakumar A G, Ganajaxi A M, Gajanan M, Arunkumar P M and Salimath M. 2012. Genotype × Environment interaction and stability analysis for grain yield black gram (Vigna mungo). Legume Research 35(1): 1–2.

Rita N, Kigwie S, Noren K, Brojen N and Pramesh K. 2016. Stability analysis of high yielding varieties of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 22: 1–9.

Shanthi P, Jebaraj S and Murugan E. 2007. Stability analysis in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Research 30(2): 154–56.

Singh J, Kumar A, Abdul F R and Singh M K. 2018. Stability analysis of pigeon pea genotypes by deployment of AMMI model under rainfed environment. Legume Research 41(2): 182–88.

Singh C, Gupta A, Gupta V, Kumar P, Sendhil R, Tyagi B S, Singh G, Chatrath R and Singh G P. 2019. Genotype × environment interaction analysis of multi-environment wheat trials in India using AMMI and GGE biplot models. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 19: 309–18.

Sridhar V, Jagan Mohan Rao P, Saikiran V, Sandhya Kishore N, Rajendar Reddy M and Praveen Kumar G. 2023. Development of stable blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] genotypes by deciphering genotype × environment interaction using EberhartRussell and AMMI models. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 14(1): 52–59.

Yan W. 2001. GGE Biplot: A windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal 93: 1111–18.

Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B, Woods S and Cornelius P L. 2007. GGE Biplot vs AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47: 643–55.

Yan W. 1999. ‘A study on the methodology of yield trial data analysis-with special reference to winter wheat in Ontario’. PhD Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Zobel R W, Wright M J and Gauch H G. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80: 388–93.