Assessing phenotypic variability and environmental interactions in wheat (Triticum aestivum) using the Eberhart and Russell Model


492 / 96

Authors

  • PARAS College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana image/svg+xml
  • MOHINDER SINGH DALAL College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana image/svg+xml
  • YOGENDER KUMAR College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana image/svg+xml
  • V S MOR College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana image/svg+xml
  • SUMAN DEVI Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India image/svg+xml
  • SONU LANGAYA Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India image/svg+xml
  • MUKESH KUMAR POONIA National Seed Project, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University Bikaner, Rajasthan
  • HARSH CHAURASIA Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i5.157523

Keywords:

Climate change, ER model, Food security, Stability, Wheat

Abstract

The stability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes across diverse environments is crucial for breeding programmes aiming to improve yield potential and resilience to climate variability. The present study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 at Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana to evaluate 16 morphological traits in wheat under normal sown conditions, drought stress, heat stress and combined drought and heat stress utilizing the Eberhart and Russell stability model. The trial was conducted in randomized complete block design (RCBD). Significant genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions were observed, underscoring the importance of selecting stable, high-yielding genotypes. Genotypes BRW 3806, DBW 303, and HD 2967 demonstrated superior yield stability across environments, making them ideal candidates for climate-resilient wheat breeding. Early-maturing genotypes DBW 110 and HD 2967 showed promise in escaping terminal heat stress, while genotypes with reduced plant height HD 2967, were well-suited for minimizing lodging risk. Spike and grain characteristics, including spike length and grain weight per spike, were directly correlated with higher yield potential, particularly in genotypes WH 1235 and BRW 3806. The study highlights the importance of integrating traits early maturity, reduced plant height and enhanced grain characteristics into aimed at enhancing wheat productivity and resilience are crucial for adapting to the challenges posed by climate change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed H, Mansour M, El-Shafei S and Youssef A. 2022. Heat stress tolerance in Egyptian wheat cultivars: A stability analysis approach. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 44(2): 99–112.

Aulakh C S, Sidhu A S, Nara U, Singh S and Singh S. 2022. Evaluation of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes under organic farming in north-west India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92(9): 1139–42.

Bapela T, Shimelis H, Tsilo T J and Mathew I. 2022. Genetic improvement of wheat for drought tolerance: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Plants 11(10): 1331.

Belete T, Solomon A and Bedru N. 2024. Stability and adaptability of released bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties for yield and yield related traits at highlands of southwestern part of Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Research and Review 9(3): 17–31.

Bhandari R, Paudel H, Nyaupane S and Poudel M R. 2024. Climate resilient breeding for high yields and stable wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines under irrigated and abiotic stress environments. Plant Stress 11: 100352.

CGIAR Annual Report. 2023. Science to transform food, land, and water systems in a climate crisis.

Duchenne-Moutien R A and Neetoo H. 2021. Climate change and emerging food safety issues: A review. Journal of Food Protection 84(11): 1884–97.

Dutta P, Sharma P and Singh A. 2023. Stability analysis of early- maturing wheat genotypes in moisture-stress regions of eastern India. Agronomy Journal 115(1): 123–35.

Eberhart S A and Russell W A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing Varieties. Crop Science 6(1): 36–40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183x000600010011x

FAO, Climate Change; https://www.fao.org/climate-change/en/, accessed on 8 March 2023.

Golan G, Weiner J, Zhao Y and Schnurbusch T. 2024. Agroecological genetics of biomass allocation in wheat uncovers genotype interactions with canopy shade and plant size. New Phytologist 242(1): 107–20.

ICAR-IIWBR. 2023. Director's Report of AICRP on Wheat and Barley 2022–23. Indian Council of Agricultural Research - Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, India. https://www.iiwbr.org

Khare V, Shukla R S, Pandey S, Singh S K and Singh C. 2024. Exploring the genotype-environment interaction of bread wheat in ambient and high-temperature planting conditions: A rigorous investigation. Scientific Reports 14(1): 2402.

Kumar R, Patel R and Kumar V. 2020. Stability analysis of wheat genotypes under rainfed conditions using the Eberhart and Russell model. Journal of Agricultural Science 12(3): 275–82.

Pandey S, Choudhary V K and Singh R P. 2021. Wheat genotype stability across agro-climatic zones in India using Eberhart and

Russell’s model. Crop Science 61(3): 1280–92.

Patwa N, Pandey V, Gupta O P, Yadav A, Meena M R, Ram S and Singh G. 2024. Unravelling wheat genotypic responses: Insights into salinity stress tolerance in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant mechanisms, osmolyte accumulation and grain quality parameters. BMC Plant Biology 24: 875.

Reynolds M P, Pask A and Mullan D. 2012. Physiological Breeding I: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Improve Crop Adaptation. CIMMYT.

Rizwan M, Shahzad M and Afzal M. 2021. Stability analysis of wheat genotypes for early heading and yield performance under heat stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany 53(2): 523–29.

Sharma D K, Gill S, Singh G and Singh R K. 2015. Breeding strategies to improve wheat for terminal heat stress tolerance in South Asia. Crop and Pasture Science 66(9): 943–57.

Singh A, Mehta R and Jha P. 2019. Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis in wheat across northern India. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132(5): 1485–98.

Trethowan R M and Mujeeb-Kazi A. 2007. Novel germplasm resources for improving environmental stress tolerance of hexaploid wheat. Crop Science 47(S3): S–127.

USDA, Foreign Agriculture Service. 2023. World agriculture production, Circular Series.

Yadav N, Kumar S and Reddy G. 2021. Stability analysis for drought tolerance in wheat using the ER model. Wheat Science 10(1): 45–56.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-10-05

Published

2025-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PARAS, DALAL, M. S. ., KUMAR, Y. ., MOR, V. S. ., DEVI, S. ., LANGAYA, S. ., POONIA, M. K. ., & CHAURASIA, H. . (2025). Assessing phenotypic variability and environmental interactions in wheat (Triticum aestivum) using the Eberhart and Russell Model. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 95(6), 671–677. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i5.157523
Citation