Evaluation of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) genotypes for biomass, sugar and ethanol production under different levels of nitrogen


327 / 96

Authors

  • KHALED MIRI Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • D S RANA Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i3.15937

Keywords:

Biomass yield, Ethanol yield, sweet sorghum, Genotypes, Nitrogen

Abstract

Sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.).Moench] stalks contain high fermentable sugar and thus have potential to produce bio-ethanol along with grains and crushed dry matter. Its cultivars differ in production potential, adaptation, duration and response to nitrogen level under different agro-climatic conditions. A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi, during kharif season of 2009 and 2010 to evaluate three sweet sorghum genotypes (varieties: RSSV 9, SSV 84, and hybrid: CSH 22 SS) under four nitrogen levels (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg N/ha for growth, biomass, fermentable sugar and potential ethanol yield. In the first year, except green biomass, juice yield, fermentable sugar yield and expected ethanol yield recorded significant increase up to 100 kg N/ha, while green biomass yield responded up to 150 kg N/ha. In the second year, all yield parameters except brix (%) showed marked improvement up to 150 kg N/ha. Expected ethanol yield recorded 83.4% and 77.7% increase due to application of 150 kg N/ha over control in 2009 and 2010 respectively. Among the genotypes, hybrid CSH 22 SS showed it’s significant superiority in the above mentioned yield parameters over varieties, except brix (%), which was the highest in RSSV 9. Hybrid CSH 22 SS recorded 112% and 34% increase in ethanol yield over SSV 84 and RSSV 9, respectively. Interaction effect of nitrogen × genotypes for all above characters, except brix (%) was significant. Hybrid CSH 22 SS responded significantly up to 150 kg N/ha, while in case of varieties response to N application was significant only up to 100 kg N/ha. Net return with 150 kg N/ha fertilizer application recorded 116.9 and 116.3% increase over control in 2009 and 2010 respectively. On an average hybrid CSH 22 SS produced net returns of ` 41 540 which was 135 and 41% higher than SSV 84 and RSSV 9 respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amal G, Ahmed N, Zaki M and Hassanein M S. 2007. Response of grain sorghum to different nitrogen sources. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 3(6): 1002–8.

Amit A and Thom W. 2010. India-biofuels. Biofuels Annual. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN). Report No. IN1058. pp 11. www. Jordan_associates.com.

Balasubramanian V, Raghauram N, Abrol Y P, Sachdev M S, Pathak H and Singh B. 2010. Reactive nitrogen: Good, Bad and Ugly. Comprehensive Status Report, 52 pp. SCON-ING, New Delhi.

Kumar S R, Shrotria P K and Deshmukh J P. 2008. Characterizing nutrient management effect on yield of sweet sorghum genotypes. World Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 787–9.

Lakkana L, Sunan N, Penjit S, Preekamol K and Pattana L. 2009. Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. Bioresource Technology 100: 4176–82.

Morris J B. 2006. Production of sweet sorghum for syrup in Kentucky. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service, Publication No. 122. 6 pp.

Parikshya Lama Tamang, B S. 2010. Nitrogen Fertilizer Requirements for Ethanol Production from Sweet and Photoperiod Sensitive Sorghums in the Texas Southern High Plains, M Sc. Thesis. Texas Technology University. 104 pp.

Pholsen S and Sornsungnoen N. 2004. Effects of nitrogen and potassium rates and planting distances on growth, yield and fodder quality of a forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Pakistsn Journal of Biological Science 7: 1793–800.

Poornima S. Geethalakshmi V and Leelamathi R M. 2008. Sowing dates and nitrogen levels on yield and juice quality of sweet sorghum. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 4: 651–4.

Propheter J L, Staggenborg S A Wu X and Wang D. 2010. Performance of annual and perennial biofuel crops: Yield during the first two years. Agronomy Journal 102: 806–14.

Ratnavathi C V, Suresh K, Vijay Kumar B S, Pallavi M, Komala V V and Seetharama N. 2010. Study on genotypic variation for ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 947–52.

Reddy S G. 2006. ‘Studies on production potential of sweet sorghum genotypes for grain and ethanol production as influenced by management practices.’ Ph.D thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. 197 pp.

Spencer G L and Meade G P. 1963. Cane Sugar Handbook, 8th edn. 646 pp. John Wiley, New York.

Sylvester A C, Niedziela E, Muchha J R and Reddy R. 2010. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on stay-green and senescent sorghum hybrids in sand culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33:185–99.

Wortmann C S, Liska A J, Ferguson R B, Lyon D J, Klein R N and Dweikat I. 2010. Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska. Agronomy Journal 102: 319–26.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-03-09

Published

2012-03-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MIRI, K., & RANA, D. S. (2012). Evaluation of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) genotypes for biomass, sugar and ethanol production under different levels of nitrogen. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(3), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i3.15937
Citation